Hello, you are using an old browser that's unsafe and no longer supported. Please consider updating your browser to a newer version, or downloading a modern browser.

Artificial Intelligence (AI)
J
Jeff Porch Training Camp
Published
Read Time 11 min read

What is AI Governance?

I’ve spent the better part of two decades designing training programs, and there’s a pattern I keep noticing. Whenever a genuinely transformative technology comes along, organizations rush to adopt it before anyone stops to ask who exactly is in charge of making sure it doesn’t blow up in everyone’s face. We saw it with cloud computing. We saw it with mobile devices. And now we’re watching the same movie play out with artificial intelligence, except the stakes are considerably higher this time around.

AI governance is the answer to that question nobody thought to ask until things started going sideways. It’s the structured approach organizations use to make sure their AI systems are safe, ethical, and actually doing what they’re supposed to do. If that sounds simple, well, it isn’t. But understanding it is becoming essential for anyone working in IT, security, compliance, or risk management. And if you’re wondering whether this applies to you, let me put it this way: AI is reshaping how businesses operate, and governance is quickly becoming the difference between organizations that thrive and those that end up as cautionary tales.

AI governance isn’t about slowing down innovation. It’s about making sure your AI systems are trustworthy, compliant, and won’t cost you your reputation or your job.

What AI Governance Actually Means

So what is it, exactly? AI governance refers to the processes, standards, and guardrails that help ensure AI systems are safe and ethical. The policies, the procedures, the oversight mechanisms that guide how artificial intelligence gets developed, deployed, and monitored inside an organization. It’s not one thing. It’s a collection of practices that together create accountability around AI use.

The reason it’s become such a hot topic isn’t complicated. AI systems make decisions that affect real people. Loan approvals. Hiring recommendations. Medical diagnoses. When those systems go wrong, the consequences can be severe. We’ve all seen the headlines about AI chatbots going off the rails or facial recognition systems misidentifying people. AI governance exists to prevent those outcomes before they happen.

But here’s what I find interesting from an educational perspective. When I talk to IT professionals about AI governance, many of them initially assume it’s purely a compliance checkbox. Something the legal team handles. That misses the point entirely. Effective AI governance requires technical understanding, business alignment, ethical reasoning, and practical implementation skills. It’s inherently cross functional, which is why so many organizations struggle to get it right.

The Core Principles That Drive AI Governance

Regardless of which specific framework or standard an organization adopts, certain principles show up consistently across AI governance approaches worldwide. Understanding these principles gives you a foundation for evaluating any AI governance program you encounter.

🎯 Core AI Governance Principles

TRANSPARENCY

Organizations should be able to explain how their AI systems work, what data they use, and how decisions get made. This doesn’t mean publishing proprietary code, but it does mean having clear documentation and the ability to answer questions about AI behavior.

ACCOUNTABILITY

Someone has to be responsible when AI systems cause harm or fail to perform as expected. Governance frameworks establish clear ownership so that when things go wrong, there’s a person or team accountable for remediation.

FAIRNESS

AI systems should not discriminate against individuals or groups based on protected characteristics. This requires careful attention to training data, model design, and ongoing monitoring for biased outputs.

SAFETY

AI systems must be designed to minimize potential harm to individuals and society. This includes technical robustness, security against adversarial attacks, and safeguards against unintended consequences.

HUMAN OVERSIGHT

Humans should maintain meaningful control over AI systems, especially for high stakes decisions. This means building in checkpoints, review processes, and the ability to override or correct AI outputs when necessary.

Major Frameworks and Regulations You Should Know

The AI governance landscape has evolved rapidly over the past few years. Several frameworks and regulations now provide structured guidance for organizations trying to implement responsible AI practices. Knowing the major players helps you understand what your organization might be required or expected to follow.

The EU AI Act is probably the most significant AI regulation globally. It classifies AI systems into risk categories and imposes strict requirements on high risk applications like those used in healthcare, employment, and critical infrastructure. Organizations operating in Europe or serving European customers need to understand this law, as it carries fines up to 35 million euros or seven percent of global annual revenue for violations.

The NIST AI Risk Management Framework provides voluntary guidance widely adopted by US organizations. Released in January 2023, it offers a practical approach to identifying and managing AI risks. Many US government agencies and private enterprises use it as a foundation for their governance programs. The framework emphasizes four core functions: govern, map, measure, and manage.

ISO/IEC 42001 is the international standard for AI management systems. It’s a certifiable standard, meaning organizations can undergo audits to demonstrate compliance. For enterprises operating across multiple jurisdictions, ISO 42001 provides a recognized framework that can satisfy various regulatory expectations simultaneously.

The OECD AI Principles were the first intergovernmental standards for AI, adopted in 2019 and updated in 2024. While not legally binding, they’ve significantly influenced other regulations and frameworks. The principles have been adopted by the G20 and serve as a common reference point for policy discussions worldwide.

In the United States, Executive Order 14179 titled Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence was signed in 2025. It sets national priorities for AI development and directs federal agencies to strengthen AI governance across civil rights, national security, and public services. If you work with government contracts or federal agencies, understanding this executive order matters.

Why AI Governance Matters for IT Professionals

If you’re reading this and wondering what AI governance has to do with your day to day work, fair question. Let me connect some dots.

Organizations are integrating AI into virtually everything. Security operations centers use AI for threat detection. IT service desks deploy AI chatbots. Development teams lean on AI coding assistants. Network operations use AI for predictive maintenance. Each of those applications creates governance questions that someone has to answer. Increasingly, that someone works in IT, security, or compliance.

A recent ISACA survey found that 85 percent of digital trust professionals expect to need more AI training within two years just to retain their current roles or advance their careers. That’s not a prediction about some distant future. That’s professionals telling you what they’re experiencing right now.

And think about the kinds of questions leadership is asking. Can we deploy this AI tool and remain compliant? What risks does our AI use create? How do we prove responsible AI practices to regulators, customers, or partners? Those used to be theoretical. Now they’re showing up in meetings, audits, and contract negotiations. The people who can answer them are the people who get pulled into the room.

Key Components of an AI Governance Program

Knowing the theory is one thing. What does AI governance actually look like when an organization puts it into practice? Specifics vary, but effective programs tend to share a few core components.

AI Policies and Standards

Every governance program starts with documented policies that define acceptable use, development standards, and behavioral expectations for AI systems. These policies establish the rules of the road and provide clear guidance for teams working with AI. Without written policies, governance becomes inconsistent and difficult to enforce.

Risk Assessment and Classification

Not all AI applications carry the same level of risk. A chatbot answering basic customer service questions requires different oversight than an algorithm making loan decisions. Governance programs include processes for assessing AI risks and classifying systems into appropriate tiers. Higher risk applications get more scrutiny, more controls, and more frequent reviews.

Roles and Responsibilities

Clear ownership prevents the diffusion of responsibility that plagues many organizations. Effective governance defines who is accountable for AI decisions at various levels. This typically includes executive sponsors, an AI governance council or committee, system owners for specific applications, and operational teams responsible for day to day monitoring.

Monitoring and Auditing

AI systems don’t stay static. Models drift over time as data patterns change. Performance degrades. New vulnerabilities emerge. Governance programs include ongoing monitoring to detect problems early and periodic audits to verify compliance with policies and regulations. This is where AI governance connects directly to skills that security and audit professionals already possess.

The Training Gap: Most organizations recognize they need AI governance, but fewer than half have formal programs in place. The biggest barrier? Lack of trained personnel who understand both AI technology and governance principles. If you’re looking for a skill set with growing demand and limited supply, this is it.

Certifications for AI Governance

Here’s where things get interesting for career development. The certification world is catching up to the AI governance demand, and there are now real credentials worth paying attention to.

ISACA, the organization behind CISA, CISM, and CRISC, has launched two new AI focused certifications that directly address governance needs. The Advanced in AI Audit (AAIA) certification targets experienced auditors who need to evaluate AI systems for governance compliance, risk management, and operational effectiveness. The Advanced in AI Security Management (AAISM) certification focuses on security professionals who need to implement AI governance and manage AI related security risks.

Both require prerequisite credentials. AAIA requires CISA, CIA, CPA, or equivalent audit certifications. AAISM requires CISM or CISSP. This stacking approach makes sense from an instructional design perspective. AI governance builds on foundational knowledge in audit, security, or risk management. You’re adding specialized expertise on top of what you already know.

The IAPP (International Association of Privacy Professionals) offers the AI Governance Professional (AIGP) certification for those coming at AI governance from a privacy angle. It sits right where AI, data protection, and privacy regulations overlap, which is useful territory if that’s your world.

For those earlier in their careers or looking for broader AI security knowledge, CompTIA’s upcoming SecAI+ certification addresses AI security fundamentals including governance concepts. Not as specialized as the ISACA credentials, but it’s a solid entry point.

Getting Started With AI Governance

You don’t need to become an AI governance expert overnight. But you should start building familiarity now, because by the time your organization desperately needs someone who understands this stuff, it’ll be too late to start from zero.

Get familiar with the major frameworks. You don’t need to memorize every detail, but you should understand what the NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, and ISO 42001 cover and how they differ. Even reading executive summaries gives you enough context to participate in conversations and spot where deeper knowledge is needed.

Then take stock of what AI your organization already uses. Most IT professionals underestimate this. Cloud services, security tools, productivity applications, business systems. AI capabilities are baked into more products than people realize. Understanding what’s already deployed helps you see where the governance gaps are.

Here’s the good news if you already work in security, audit, or compliance: you’re not starting from scratch. Risk assessment, policy development, compliance monitoring, evaluating controls. AI governance applies those same foundational skills to a new domain. The learning curve is real, but it’s way less steep than it would be for someone without that background.

And when the time is right, pursue formal training and certification. Those credentials validate knowledge to employers and give you a structured learning path. But they work best when combined with practical experience. Knowing governance concepts in a classroom matters less than being able to apply them when your CISO walks in with a question about the new AI tool the marketing team just deployed.

🎯 Where AI Governance Is Heading

AI governance isn’t a temporary compliance exercise that will fade away once the hype settles. It’s becoming a permanent part of how organizations manage technology risk. As AI capabilities expand and regulations mature, governance requirements will only increase. The professionals who develop expertise now are planting themselves right where technology meets policy, which is exactly where the important decisions get made. From my perspective in educational services, I haven’t seen a skill development opportunity this significant in a long time. The organizations that figure out AI governance early gain competitive advantages. The individuals who build these skills become the people their organizations can’t afford to lose. It’s not about whether AI governance matters. It’s about whether you’ll be ready when your organization needs someone who understands it.