Zero Trust Architecture: Which Certifications Actually Cover It?

My consulting partner Marcus gets asked the same question by clients constantly. They tell him their CISO wants to implement zero trust, their board is asking about it, and their security team needs to understand it beyond buzzwords. Then they ask which certification actually teaches zero trust properly. We catch up about once a month over coffee to compare notes on what we’re seeing with clients, and Marcus has been deep in zero trust architecture for the better part of a decade. His answer surprises most people.

Most mainstream security certifications barely scratch the surface of zero trust architecture. They might mention it in passing or include a few exam questions, but they don’t dive deep enough to help you actually implement it. During our monthly catch-ups, Marcus walks me through what he’s learning from enterprise implementations across Europe, and we’ve figured out which credentials genuinely prepare you for zero trust work and which ones just namedrop the concept.

What Zero Trust Actually Means

Before we talk certifications, let’s clear up what zero trust really is. Marcus told me about sitting in a meeting last month where a VP kept referring to their new VPN as their “zero trust solution.” That’s not zero trust. That’s just a VPN with good marketing.

Zero trust is an architectural approach built on the principle that you trust nothing by default, whether it’s inside or outside your network perimeter. Every user, device, and application must be verified before accessing resources. According to NIST’s Zero Trust Architecture framework, this means continuous verification, least privilege access, and assuming breach as the default state.

The concept emerged because traditional perimeter security failed. Once an attacker got inside the network, they could move laterally without much resistance. Zero trust removes the idea of a trusted internal network entirely. Every access request gets evaluated based on identity, device health, location, and behavior, regardless of where it originates.

Marcus puts it this way: if someone thinks zero trust is a product they can buy or a single technology they can deploy, we need to back up and talk about architecture before we talk about implementation. It’s a strategy, not a solution you purchase off the shelf.

Why Most Certifications Don’t Cover Zero Trust Well

Here’s the uncomfortable truth about certification bodies. They move slowly. Zero trust has been gaining traction since around 2010 when John Kindervag coined the term at Forrester, but it really exploded in popularity after 2019. Most major certifications take years to update their exam content, which means they’re often teaching you security concepts from five or ten years ago.

The other issue is depth versus breadth. Foundational certifications like Security+ or CISSP need to cover a massive range of security topics. Zero trust might get a few pages in the study guide and a handful of exam questions, but there’s not enough room to really teach you how to design and implement a zero trust architecture. You’ll learn that it exists and understand the basic principles, but you won’t be ready to lead a zero trust initiative.

CISSP: Foundational Coverage with Limits

The CISSP does touch on zero trust principles, particularly in its Security Architecture and Engineering domain. You’ll encounter questions about network segmentation, access controls, and security architecture design that align with zero trust thinking. The 2024 exam outline specifically mentions zero trust as part of secure network architecture concepts.

However, zero trust isn’t a major focus area. Out of 250 questions covering eight domains, you might see 10 to 15 questions that relate to zero trust concepts, and many of those will be indirect. The CISSP gives you the foundational security knowledge you need to understand why zero trust matters, but it won’t make you an expert in implementing it. If you’re weighing whether to pursue CISSP first, our guide on CISM vs CISSP breaks down which certification fits different career paths.

That said, CISSP is still valuable for anyone working with zero trust. The certification teaches you defense in depth, least privilege, and risk management principles that underpin effective zero trust strategies. Think of it as learning the security fundamentals that zero trust builds upon, not zero trust itself.

Marcus’s Take: If you’re new to security architecture, get your CISSP first. You need that broad foundation before specializing in zero trust. But don’t expect CISSP alone to prepare you for leading a zero trust implementation. You’ll need additional training and hands-on experience.

CCSP: Strong Cloud Zero Trust Focus

The Certified Cloud Security Professional from (ISC)² is where things get more interesting. Cloud environments naturally align with zero trust principles because you don’t have a traditional network perimeter. Everything is distributed, access happens from anywhere, and trust boundaries are blurry at best.

CCSP covers identity and access management in depth, including concepts like just-in-time access, continuous authentication, and least privilege that are central to zero trust. The certification also addresses cloud network security, microsegmentation, and software-defined perimeters, all of which support zero trust architectures.

Marcus has worked with several cloud security architects who said their CCSP preparation significantly improved their understanding of how to implement zero trust in cloud environments. The exam forces you to think about security controls in distributed systems where you can’t rely on network position for trust decisions. For more on cloud security certifications, check out our comparison of CCSP vs CISSP.

The limitation is right there in the name: it’s cloud-focused. If you need to implement zero trust across hybrid environments that include on-premises infrastructure, CCSP won’t cover all the scenarios you’ll face. But for modern cloud-native or cloud-heavy organizations, CCSP offers solid zero trust preparation.

CompTIA Security+: Zero Trust Basics

Security+ is an entry-level certification, so expectations should match that reality. The exam does mention zero trust as part of its security architecture section. You’ll learn what zero trust means conceptually and understand its basic components like identity verification, microsegmentation, and continuous monitoring.

For someone just starting in cybersecurity, Security+ provides a good introduction to the concept. You’ll be able to have intelligent conversations about zero trust and understand why organizations are moving in that direction. But you won’t be equipped to design or implement zero trust architectures based on Security+ alone.

Think of Security+ as planting the seed. It introduces you to modern security thinking, including zero trust, and gives you the vocabulary to continue learning. Just don’t put “zero trust expert” on your resume because you passed Security+.

CISM: Strategic Zero Trust Understanding

CISM approaches zero trust from a management perspective rather than a technical one. As a security manager certification, CISM focuses on governance, risk management, and program development. Zero trust fits into these discussions as a strategic initiative that requires organizational change, not just technology deployment.

The certification covers how to build business cases for security initiatives, manage stakeholder expectations, and align security strategies with business objectives. These skills matter tremendously when you’re trying to get buy-in for a zero trust transformation that will disrupt existing workflows and require significant investment.

CISM also addresses incident response and business continuity planning, which need to be rethought in a zero trust environment. How do you handle incidents when you no longer have a clear inside versus outside? How do you maintain business continuity when every access request requires verification?

The weakness is that CISM won’t teach you the technical implementation details. You’ll understand the management and governance aspects of zero trust, but you’ll need technical team members or additional training to handle the architecture and deployment.

Vendor-Specific Zero Trust Certifications

Here’s where things get interesting. Some of the most detailed zero trust training comes from vendors who build the products that enable zero trust architectures. Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco, and others offer certifications that dive deep into implementing zero trust using their platforms.

Microsoft Security Certifications

Microsoft has embraced zero trust as a core principle across Azure and Microsoft 365. Their SC-900 (Security, Compliance, and Identity Fundamentals) introduces zero trust concepts, while SC-300 (Identity and Access Administrator) goes much deeper into implementing identity-based zero trust controls. Microsoft’s zero trust documentation provides detailed guidance on their implementation approach.

For organizations using Microsoft’s ecosystem, these certifications provide practical, hands-on knowledge about implementing zero trust. You’ll learn conditional access policies, identity protection, privileged identity management, and other tools that form the foundation of Microsoft’s zero trust approach.

The obvious limitation is vendor lock-in. You’re learning Microsoft’s implementation of zero trust principles, which may not translate directly to other platforms. However, the underlying concepts do transfer, and if your organization runs on Microsoft infrastructure, this is extremely practical training.

Palo Alto Networks Certifications

Palo Alto Networks built their entire security platform around zero trust principles. Their PCCSE (Certified Cloud Security Engineer) and PCSAE (Certified Security Automation Engineer) certifications include substantial zero trust content, particularly around network segmentation, identity-based policy enforcement, and automated response.

Marcus has seen these certifications benefit network security professionals who need to understand how zero trust changes network architecture. The training covers practical implementation challenges like migrating from VPN-based access to zero trust network access, implementing microsegmentation, and monitoring east-west traffic.

Marcus asked me last month to help a client figure out whether they should pursue vendor certifications or stick with vendor-neutral credentials. His answer: it depends on your role. If you’re implementing zero trust next quarter using specific products, get the vendor certs. If you’re making strategic decisions about which approach to take, start with vendor-neutral foundations.

Emerging Zero Trust-Specific Credentials

The certification industry is starting to catch up with demand. New credentials are emerging that focus specifically on zero trust architecture and implementation. The Cloud Security Alliance offers zero trust training and research, though not yet a formal certification. Several training providers have launched zero trust specialist programs.

These specialized programs typically cover the full zero trust lifecycle, from initial assessment and planning through implementation, monitoring, and continuous improvement. They’re designed for security architects and engineers who will actually build zero trust environments, not just understand them conceptually.

The challenge with newer certifications is market recognition. An HR recruiter knows what CISSP means. They might not know about a zero trust specialist certification from a smaller training provider. But if you’re already established in your career and need the practical knowledge more than the credential recognition, these focused programs can be valuable.

What About NIST Training?

NIST published Special Publication 800-207, Zero Trust Architecture, in 2020. This document has become the de facto standard for understanding zero trust from a vendor-neutral perspective. The framework outlines the core principles, logical components, and deployment models for zero trust.

NIST itself doesn’t offer certifications, but understanding their framework is essential for anyone working with zero trust. Federal agencies and many private sector organizations base their zero trust strategies on NIST’s guidance. If you can demonstrate knowledge of NIST SP 800-207, you’re speaking the common language that cuts across different vendors and implementations.

Several certification programs now explicitly align their zero trust content with the NIST framework. When evaluating certifications, check whether they reference NIST SP 800-207. It’s a good indicator that the training covers standard zero trust principles rather than just vendor-specific approaches.

What Marcus Taught Me: He keeps a copy of NIST SP 800-207 on his laptop and references it regularly when working with clients. It’s free, authoritative, and comprehensive. Start there before paying for any certification. If you understand the NIST framework thoroughly, you’ll be able to evaluate which certifications actually add value beyond what you can learn from that document.

Building Your Zero Trust Learning Path

After reviewing what’s actually available, here’s my recommended approach for different career stages and goals.

If You’re New to Security

Start with Security+ to get foundational security knowledge including basic zero trust concepts. You need to understand traditional security models before you can appreciate why zero trust represents a paradigm shift. If you’re wondering about the difficulty level, we’ve covered what to expect from the Security+ exam. After Security+, consider Network+ or a cloud fundamentals certification to understand the infrastructure that zero trust architectures run on.

Don’t rush into advanced zero trust training before you have solid fundamentals. Marcus has seen junior professionals struggle with zero trust concepts because they never learned traditional network security first. You need that baseline to understand what problems zero trust solves.

If You’re a Security Engineer or Architect

Get your CISSP if you don’t have it already. That gives you the broad security architecture knowledge you need. Then add CCSP if you work primarily in cloud environments, or pursue vendor-specific certifications that match your organization’s technology stack.

Supplement certifications with hands-on experience. Build a lab environment where you can test zero trust concepts. Implement conditional access policies, configure microsegmentation, set up identity-based access controls. The practical experience matters more than having another certificate on your wall.

If You’re in Security Leadership

CISM should be your foundation because you need the management and governance perspective. Learn enough about the technical implementation to ask intelligent questions and evaluate proposals, but focus your energy on building organizational buy-in and managing the change process.

Consider executive-level security training that addresses zero trust from a strategic perspective. You need to speak credibly to your board and executive team about why zero trust matters, what it will cost, and how long transformation will take. That’s different knowledge than what your engineers need.

The Reality About Certifications and Zero Trust

Let me be direct about something that makes certification bodies uncomfortable, something Marcus and I discuss every time we catch up. No single certification will make you a zero trust expert. The field is too new and evolving too quickly for any exam to capture everything you need to know.

The best zero trust practitioners Marcus knows learned through a combination of foundational certifications, vendor-specific training, hands-on implementation, and continuous learning from real-world deployments. They read NIST guidance, follow security researchers, participate in industry forums, and learn from their mistakes.

Certifications provide structure and validate baseline knowledge. They’re valuable for career advancement and demonstrating commitment to learning. But they’re just one piece of building real expertise. If you want to truly understand zero trust, you need to combine certifications with practical experience implementing it in real environments with real constraints and real stakeholders who resist change.

Marcus brought me in on a zero trust project in Amsterdam last year. The security architect had every relevant certification you can imagine, but he’d never actually deployed zero trust before, and it showed. Meanwhile, their lead engineer had only Security+ and a Microsoft certification, but she’d implemented zero trust in two previous roles. Guess who ended up driving the project? Practical experience wins every time.

Where to Focus Your Learning

Instead of asking which certification covers zero trust best, ask yourself what you need to accomplish. Are you trying to lead your organization’s zero trust transformation? Are you implementing specific technologies? Are you evaluating vendors? Are you building security architecture? Your goal should drive your learning path.

For broad understanding and career credibility, CISSP remains the gold standard. For cloud-specific implementation, CCSP provides strong practical knowledge. For management and governance, CISM gives you the strategic perspective. For hands-on technical work with specific platforms, vendor certifications offer the most detailed guidance.

But remember that zero trust is fundamentally about changing how your organization thinks about security, not just deploying new tools. The soft skills of communication, change management, and stakeholder engagement matter as much as technical knowledge. No certification teaches those skills. You develop them through experience.

The zero trust field will continue evolving rapidly. New threats will emerge, technologies will improve, and best practices will change. Your goal shouldn’t be to get certified and consider yourself done. It should be to build a foundation of knowledge and then commit to continuous learning as the field develops.

Zero trust represents a fundamental shift in how we approach security. The certifications available today provide pieces of the puzzle, but none of them give you the complete picture. Start with solid foundations like CISSP or CCSP, supplement with vendor-specific training that matches your technology stack, and most importantly, get your hands dirty with actual implementations. That combination of formal learning and practical experience is what builds genuine expertise in zero trust architecture.

 

Can I Get CISSP Without 5 Years Experience?

The short answer is yes, you can pursue CISSP without five years of experience. However, there is a critical distinction that creates significant confusion among security professionals, and understanding this distinction fundamentally changes how you should approach this certification. At Training Camp, we have guided nearly 100,000 professionals through their certification journeys since 1999, and the CISSP experience requirement consistently generates more inquiries than virtually any other aspect of professional certification.

This article clarifies exactly how the Associate of ISC2 pathway operates, what it means for your career trajectory, and whether this approach represents a strategic decision for your professional development. This is not merely about satisfying requirements. It is about making informed decisions that accelerate your career advancement while building substantive expertise that delivers long-term value.

Understanding the CISSP Experience Requirement

The standard CISSP certification requires five years of cumulative, paid work experience in two or more of the eight CISSP domains. This experience must be professional, meaning actual employment in information security roles. Volunteer work, academic projects, and personal security initiatives do not qualify toward this requirement.

However, ISC2 recognizes that education and prior certifications demonstrate security knowledge that can substitute for some experience. If you hold a four year college degree or an approved credential from ISC2’s list, you can waive one year of the experience requirement. This reduces the total requirement to four years of required experience instead of five.

The eight CISSP domains that qualify for experience include Security and Risk Management, Asset Security, Security Architecture and Engineering, Communication and Network Security, Identity and Access Management, Security Assessment and Testing, Security Operations, and Software Development Security. According to ISC2’s experience requirements, your work must involve actual security responsibilities within these domains, not merely tangential exposure to security concepts.

From a strategic perspective, the experience requirement exists for sound reasons. CISSP is not an entry level certification. It is designed to validate that you have worked in security long enough to understand how concepts apply in authentic organizational contexts. The experience requirement ensures that CISSP holders bring practical judgment and contextual understanding, not merely theoretical knowledge.

The Associate of ISC2 Pathway Explained

This is where clarity becomes essential. ISC2 allows candidates to take and pass the CISSP exam before they meet the full experience requirement. When you pass the exam without the required experience, you earn the Associate of ISC2 designation rather than the full CISSP credential.

The Associate designation signifies that you have demonstrated the knowledge required for CISSP by passing one of the industry’s most rigorous examinations. However, you have not yet accumulated the practical experience that ISC2 requires for full certification. You are in a transitional status, proving your knowledge while building your experience.

How the Associate Program Works

After you pass the CISSP exam, you have six years to gain the required work experience and submit it for endorsement by an ISC2 certified professional. This six year window is deliberately generous, designed to accommodate professionals who are building their careers while working toward full certification.

During your time as an Associate, you are held to the same ethical standards as full CISSP holders. You must adhere to ISC2’s Code of Ethics, maintain good standing with the organization, and earn continuing professional education credits annually. You pay the same annual maintenance fees as certified members. The primary difference is that you cannot yet claim the CISSP credential or use the CISSP certification mark.

Once you accumulate the required experience, you submit an endorsement application detailing your work history across the CISSP domains. An ISC2 certified professional must endorse your application, confirming that your experience is legitimate and relevant. After ISC2 reviews and approves your application, you transition from Associate to full CISSP certification.

What You Can and Cannot Do as an Associate

As an Associate of ISC2, you can list the credential on your resume and LinkedIn profile using the designation “Associate of ISC2.” You can mention that you have passed the CISSP exam. You cannot, however, call yourself a CISSP or use the CISSP certification mark. This distinction carries significant weight in professional settings and job applications.

The credential demonstrates to employers that you have the knowledge base required for CISSP, even though you are still building the practical experience. Many organizations view this positively, particularly when hiring for junior to mid level security positions where they expect to provide mentorship and on the job training. Research from Cybersecurity Ventures indicates that the global shortage of cybersecurity professionals creates opportunities for candidates who demonstrate commitment through certifications, even when they are still building experience.

Critical Point: When applying for positions that require CISSP certification, you must be transparent about your Associate status. Some positions specifically require full CISSP certification, particularly government contracts with DoD 8570 requirements. Others will accept Associate status provided you are progressing toward full certification. Transparency about your credential status is not merely ethical, it is strategically essential for building trust with employers.

Strategic Considerations: Should You Pursue CISSP Early?

The fundamental question is not whether you can take CISSP without five years of experience. The question is whether you should. This decision requires honest assessment of where you are in your career and what you are attempting to accomplish strategically.

When Pursuing CISSP Early Makes Sense

If you are working in a security role and actively gaining relevant experience, taking CISSP early can be strategically valuable. You are demonstrating your technical knowledge while simultaneously building the experience you need for full certification. By the time you reach the four or five year mark, you can immediately submit for endorsement and convert your Associate status to full CISSP.

This approach works particularly well if you are in an organization that values continuous learning and professional development. Passing CISSP demonstrates initiative and commitment. It shows your employer that you are serious about your security career and willing to invest in developing expertise. This can position you for enhanced project assignments, increased responsibilities, and accelerated career progression.

Taking CISSP early also makes sense if you are transitioning from a related technical field into cybersecurity. Perhaps you have worked in network engineering, systems administration, or software development for several years. You have transferable technical skills but you are newer to dedicated security roles. Passing CISSP while working in your first or second security position accelerates your credibility in the security field and demonstrates your commitment to understanding what CISSP represents in the industry.

When You Should Wait

If you are new to IT and cybersecurity with minimal relevant experience, taking CISSP immediately is not the optimal strategic move. The examination assumes foundational knowledge across all eight domains. Without real world context for these concepts, you will struggle to pass the exam, and even if you succeed, you will not be able to apply the knowledge effectively in professional settings.

Start instead with foundational certifications that match your current skill level. CompTIA A+ for IT fundamentals, Security+ for security basics, or Network+ for networking knowledge. Build actual experience in security related roles. Then pursue CISSP when you have sufficient context to make the exam preparation meaningful and the certification valuable. Understanding frameworks like NIST’s Cybersecurity Framework through actual implementation experience will significantly enhance your CISSP preparation and performance.

Also consider waiting if your current role has no security responsibilities. Passing CISSP will not transform you into a security professional if you are working in unrelated IT functions. Focus first on transitioning into a security role, even if entry level. Gain exposure to how security operates in authentic organizational contexts. Then pursue CISSP with that foundation in place.

In my experience leading Training Camp, the professionals who succeed with early CISSP pursuit share common characteristics. They are already working in technical roles with security exposure. They are committed to building a security career. They understand that passing the examination is merely the beginning of a longer journey toward full certification and security expertise. If that describes your situation, the Associate path can deliver exceptional results.

How Employers View Associate Status

Understanding how the job market perceives Associate of ISC2 status enables you to make informed decisions about timing and career strategy. Different employers maintain different perspectives, and knowing what to expect prevents disappointment and helps you target appropriate opportunities.

Private Sector Perspective

Most private sector employers view Associate status positively for junior to mid level positions. They recognize that you have passed a rigorous examination and demonstrated commitment to the security profession. Many organizations are willing to hire Associates into security analyst, security engineer, or similar roles where they can provide mentorship and help you build the experience needed for full certification.

The key is managing expectations appropriately. Do not apply for senior security positions that explicitly require CISSP if you hold Associate status. Target roles that match your experience level and treat your Associate status as a differentiator among other candidates at similar career stages. You are demonstrating initiative and technical knowledge that many entry level candidates lack. As you advance and potentially consider management roles, understanding the distinction between technical and management credentials becomes important, as outlined in our comparison of CISM vs CISSP certifications.

Government and Defense Contractor Requirements

This is where Associate status becomes more complex. Many government positions and defense contractor roles specifically require full CISSP certification because of DoD 8140 (formerly 8570) and other compliance frameworks. These positions cannot accept Associate status as a substitute, regardless of your knowledge or examination performance.

If your career goal involves government work or defense contracting, you need full CISSP certification, not merely Associate status. Plan your timeline accordingly. Build the required experience through other roles first, then pursue CISSP when you can immediately obtain full certification. Alternatively, start with other certifications like Security+ that meet DoD 8140 requirements for entry level positions, gain experience in those roles, and progress to CISSP for higher level positions.

Career Progression Considerations

Associate status can actually facilitate internal career progression at your current employer. If your organization supports professional development, passing CISSP while working toward the experience requirement demonstrates ambition and capability. This can position you for promotions, special projects, or security team assignments that accelerate your path to full certification.

Some organizations structure security career paths with Associate status as a formal milestone. They hire technical professionals, support them through CISSP examination preparation, and create roles specifically designed to help Associates build qualifying experience. If you work for or can identify an employer with this approach, the Associate pathway becomes highly strategic.

Industry Reality: The cybersecurity talent shortage means organizations need to develop talent internally rather than exclusively hiring experienced professionals. Associate status fits perfectly into this reality. You are demonstrating potential and knowledge while building experience. Forward thinking employers recognize this dynamic and create opportunities accordingly. Position yourself strategically to capitalize on this trend.

Building Qualifying Experience Strategically

If you decide to pursue the Associate pathway, approach your experience building with clear intention. Not all security work will help you meet the CISSP requirements effectively, and understanding what qualifies helps you make strategic career decisions.

What Counts as Qualifying Experience

Your work must involve direct, paid, professional information security responsibilities within the CISSP domains. Security analyst roles where you monitor security events, investigate incidents, and respond to threats qualify strongly. Security engineering positions where you implement security controls, configure security tools, and design security solutions qualify across multiple domains.

Systems administration work can qualify if you have significant security responsibilities. Managing access controls, implementing security patches, maintaining security configurations, and supporting security compliance initiatives all count. Network administration experience qualifies when your work focuses on network security implementation, firewall management, intrusion detection, and secure network architecture.

Risk management, security assessment, and security audit roles qualify well for the Security and Risk Management domain. Application security work qualifies for Software Development Security. Security awareness training and policy development work qualifies under Security and Risk Management. The key is demonstrating actual security responsibilities, not merely working in IT with occasional security exposure.

What Does Not Qualify

General IT work without security focus does not meet the requirement. If you are a help desk technician, desktop support specialist, or general systems administrator without specific security responsibilities, that experience will not qualify. Academic work, personal projects, and volunteer activities do not count, regardless of how relevant they might be to security.

Part time work and internships generally do not qualify unless they involve paid professional security responsibilities. Security training courses, certifications, and self study demonstrate knowledge but do not substitute for actual work experience. The requirement is specifically about performing security work professionally, not merely learning about security concepts.

Career Path Strategy

If you are starting from a general IT role and want to build CISSP qualifying experience, target security specific positions as your next career move. Look for Security Analyst, Junior Security Engineer, SOC Analyst, or Security Operations roles. These positions typically require some IT background but not extensive security experience, making them accessible while providing the security focus you need for CISSP.

Once in a security role, seek opportunities to work across multiple CISSP domains. Volunteer for projects involving security architecture, participate in incident response, engage in risk assessments, and support security policy development. The breadth of experience across domains strengthens your eventual CISSP application and develops you into a more well rounded security professional.

Document your experience as you progress. Maintain detailed notes about projects, responsibilities, and security initiatives you have participated in. When it comes time to submit your endorsement application, you will have clear examples demonstrating your work across the CISSP domains. This documentation also facilitates the process when an ISC2 certified professional endorses your application.

The CISSP Exam Without Experience: What to Expect

Taking CISSP without the full experience requirement does not change the examination itself. You face the same test, the same difficulty level, and the same passing standard as candidates with decades of security experience. Understanding what this means helps establish realistic expectations for preparation and success.

Exam Format and Challenge

CISSP uses computerized adaptive testing with 100 to 150 questions over a maximum of three hours. The examination adapts to your performance, presenting more difficult questions when you answer correctly and adjusting when you struggle. This format makes it impossible to predict exactly what you will encounter during your test.

The questions test your ability to think like a security professional, not merely recall facts. You will face scenario based questions where you need to evaluate options and choose the optimal approach from a security perspective. Without real world experience, these scenarios require more mental translation. You are learning to think like a security professional while simultaneously learning the technical content.

Preparation Requirements

Candidates without extensive security experience typically require longer preparation time than experienced professionals. Plan for four to six months of serious study if you are newer to security, dedicating 15 to 20 hours weekly. Experienced security professionals often prepare in two to three months with similar weekly commitments.

Your preparation needs to cover all eight domains comprehensively. You cannot rely on work experience to fill gaps in your knowledge because you do not yet have that experience. Use multiple study resources including the official ISC2 study guide, practice examinations, video courses, and study groups. Consider instructor led boot camps that provide structured learning paths and expert guidance through complex topics. For detailed preparation strategies, review our comprehensive guide on how long it takes to earn your CISSP.

Focus particularly on understanding the reasoning behind security concepts, not merely the definitions. The examination tests your judgment about security decisions. When studying access control models, understand not only how they function but when you would implement each model and what business requirements drive those decisions. This managerial perspective is crucial for CISSP success.

From our experience at Training Camp, the pass rate for candidates without full experience is lower than for experienced professionals, but it is absolutely achievable with proper preparation. The key is acknowledging the additional challenge and adjusting your study approach accordingly. More time, more practice questions, and more focus on understanding application rather than memorization will position you for success.

Alternative Paths to Consider

Before committing to CISSP as an Associate, consider whether other certifications might serve your immediate career needs more effectively. CISSP is not the only pathway into cybersecurity, and starting with more appropriate certifications can build a stronger foundation for long term success.

Entry Level Security Certifications

CompTIA Security+ requires no prerequisites and covers foundational security concepts. It is recognized by DoD 8140 for entry level positions and opens doors to your first security roles. Many professionals start with Security+, gain experience in security positions, and then pursue CISSP when they have the context to maximize its value.

Systems Security Certified Practitioner (SSCP), also from ISC2, requires only one year of experience and covers technical security implementation. It is often described as a stepping stone to CISSP and provides essential technical security knowledge. If you are newer to security, SSCP might be more appropriate than immediately jumping to CISSP Associate status.

Specialized Security Paths

If you are interested in specific security domains, consider specialized certifications that match your interests. Certified Ethical Hacker (CEH) or Offensive Security Certified Professional (OSCP) for penetration testing. GIAC certifications for specialized technical skills. These build expertise in specific areas while you are gaining the broad experience CISSP requires.

Cloud security certifications like AWS Certified Security Specialty or Azure Security Engineer Associate align with how organizations are actually implementing security today. If your career is focused on cloud environments, these certifications might provide more immediate value than CISSP while you are building general security experience.

The Layered Certification Approach

Many successful security professionals build their certifications in strategic layers. Start with foundational credentials that match your current experience level. These certifications help you secure security roles where you gain qualifying experience. Pursue CISSP when you have sufficient experience that the certification validates authentic capabilities rather than merely examination performance.

This approach builds credibility progressively. Each certification serves a specific career purpose rather than being an end goal in itself. You are not rushing to CISSP because of its prestige. You are building a certification portfolio that reflects genuine skill development and career progression. This resonates more authentically with employers and creates stronger career momentum over time.

Making the Right Decision for Your Career

Yes, you can obtain CISSP without five years of experience through the Associate of ISC2 pathway. However, whether you should depends entirely on your specific situation, career objectives, and current position in the security field.

Pursue the Associate path if you are already working in security roles and building relevant experience. The certification demonstrates your knowledge and commitment while you accumulate the work history required for full CISSP. You are investing in your future credentials while your experience aligns with your knowledge.

Consider waiting and building experience first if you are new to IT or working in non security roles. Start with certifications that match your current level, focus on securing security positions, and pursue CISSP when you have the foundation to make it truly valuable. There is significant merit in taking a measured approach that builds genuine expertise rather than rushing credentials without substance.

Remember that CISSP is a tool for career advancement, not a solution in itself. The certification works optimally when it validates authentic skills and experience you can demonstrate to employers. Whether you pursue it as an Associate or wait for full qualification, ensure you are building actual security capabilities alongside the credential. That combination drives authentic career success and professional development.

Leadership Perspective

After helping train nearly 100,000 certification candidates through Training Camp, I have observed every possible path to CISSP. The Associate pathway delivers exceptional results for motivated professionals who are actively building their security careers. It performs poorly for individuals attempting to circumvent experience requirements or collect certifications without genuine skill development. Be honest with yourself about where you are, where you want to progress, and what path serves your long term career success rather than short term credential accumulation. That honest assessment makes the critical difference between certification success and career advancement.

 

CISSP vs CISM: Which One Should I Get First?

I get asked this question at least three times a week. People call Training Camp, email me directly, or corner me at conferences with the same concern: should I get my CISSP or CISM first? They’ve heard both certifications are valuable, they know they want to advance their cybersecurity career, but they’re genuinely stuck on which one makes the most sense as their next step.

Here’s what I tell them. This isn’t about which certification is better. Both CISSP and CISM are excellent credentials that can significantly boost your career. The real question is which one aligns with where you are right now and where you want to go. Let me break down exactly how to make this decision for your specific situation.

Understanding What Each Certification Actually Validates

Before we talk about which one to pursue first, you need to understand what each certification actually proves about your skills and experience. This is where a lot of confusion starts, people treat CISSP and CISM like they’re interchangeable when they’re really designed for different professional paths.

CISSP: The Technical Security Expert Credential

CISSP stands for Certified Information Systems Security Professional, and it’s offered by ISC2. This certification is broad and deep. It covers eight domains that span the entire information security field, from security architecture and engineering to software development security, from asset security to security operations.

When you earn your CISSP, you’re demonstrating that you have comprehensive technical knowledge across all major areas of cybersecurity. You understand how security controls work at a technical level. You can design secure systems, implement security solutions, and handle the day to day technical challenges that come up in security operations.

The CISSP exam tests your ability to think like a security professional who needs to solve technical problems. According to (ISC)², CISSP holders work in roles like security architect, security engineer, security analyst, and security consultant. These are hands on technical positions where you’re directly implementing and managing security controls.

CISM: The Security Management Credential

CISM stands for Certified Information Security Manager, and it’s offered by ISACA. The focus here is completely different. CISM is about managing and governing information security programs from an enterprise perspective. You’re not in the weeds implementing firewalls or configuring security tools. You’re overseeing the entire security program, aligning it with business objectives, and managing the people and processes that make security work at scale.

The four domains of CISM cover information security governance, risk management, incident management, and security program development and management. This is executive level thinking. You’re dealing with board presentations, budget justifications, regulatory compliance, and strategic security planning.

ISACA designed CISM for people who manage security teams, report to C-level executives, and make strategic decisions about security investments and priorities. Common roles include Security Manager, CISO, Director of Information Security, and Security Program Manager.

Here’s the simplest way I explain it. If you’re the person configuring security controls, analyzing vulnerabilities, and responding to security incidents, you want CISSP. If you’re the person deciding which security controls to invest in, overseeing the team that responds to incidents, and explaining security strategy to business leaders, you want CISM.

Experience Requirements: Which Can You Actually Get Right Now?

This is often the deciding factor, and honestly, it should be. Both certifications have experience requirements, and understanding these requirements will immediately tell you which one makes sense for your current career stage.

CISSP Experience Requirements

CISSP requires five years of cumulative paid work experience in two or more of the eight CISSP domains. If you have a four year college degree or an approved credential from the ISC2 list, you can substitute one year, bringing it down to four years of required experience.

The key word here is cumulative. Your experience doesn’t need to be consecutive, and it can span multiple jobs. As long as you’ve worked in relevant security roles for the required time period, you qualify. The experience needs to be in security specific functions, but ISC2 interprets this relatively broadly. Security analyst, network security engineer, security administrator, and similar technical security roles all count.

You can take the CISSP exam before you meet the experience requirement and earn an Associate of ISC2 designation. You then have six years to gain the required experience and submit it for endorsement to become a full CISSP. This is a solid path if you’re early in your career but want to demonstrate your technical knowledge now.

CISM Experience Requirements

CISM requires five years of work experience in information security management. Notice the emphasis on management. ISACA is specifically looking for experience where you’ve managed security programs, led security initiatives, or overseen security operations. You can substitute up to two years of this requirement with related experience or education, but you need a minimum of three years in actual management roles.

This is stricter than CISSP’s requirements. ISACA wants to see that you’ve actually done management level security work. If you’ve been a security analyst for five years but never supervised anyone or managed security programs, that experience doesn’t fully qualify for CISM. You’d need to show progression into management responsibilities.

Like CISSP, you can pass the CISM exam before meeting the experience requirement. You’ll earn a passing status and have five years to submit qualifying experience for certification. But here’s the reality: if you don’t have management experience yet, passing the CISM exam won’t help you much in the job market. Employers know the difference between passing the exam and actually holding the certification.

My Advice Based on Experience Level: If you have less than three years of security experience, start with CISSP. If you’ve been in technical security roles for five plus years but haven’t managed teams or programs, CISSP makes more sense. If you’re already in a security management role or have led security initiatives, CISM is the better choice. Don’t try to force CISM early in your career just because it sounds more prestigious. Get the certification that matches where you actually are.

Career Path Considerations

Your current experience tells you which certification you can get. Your career goals tell you which certification you should get. Let me walk you through different career scenarios and which certification makes the most strategic sense.

If You Want to Stay Technical

Maybe you love the technical side of security. You enjoy penetration testing, security architecture, incident response, or security engineering. You’re not particularly interested in managing people or dealing with governance and compliance. In that case, CISSP is absolutely the right choice.

CISSP opens doors to senior technical positions. Security architects at major tech companies hold CISSP. Lead penetration testers at security firms hold CISSP. Senior security engineers at government contractors hold CISSP. The certification validates that you have the deep technical knowledge needed for these specialized roles, including understanding how to implement frameworks like NIST’s Cybersecurity Framework at a technical level.

You can build an entire successful career staying on the technical track with CISSP as your anchor certification. Many people do exactly that, and they’re highly paid and deeply satisfied with their work. If this sounds like you, don’t feel pressured to pursue CISM just because people say management is the natural career progression. It’s not.

If You’re Moving Into Management

On the other hand, maybe you’ve been offered a security manager position or you’re being groomed for leadership. You’re starting to lead projects, manage small teams, or handle program level security initiatives. You’re attending more meetings with business stakeholders and fewer hands on technical sessions. This is the inflection point where CISM becomes more valuable than CISSP.

CISM gives you the framework and credibility you need for management roles. When you interview for a Security Manager or Director of Security position, hiring managers look for CISM. When your company is hiring a CISO, the job posting almost always lists CISM as preferred or required. The certification signals that you think strategically about security, not just tactically, and understand how to align security initiatives with business objectives using established governance frameworks like those outlined in ISACA’s governance resources.

Here’s something important though. Most successful CISOs and senior security leaders have both CISSP and CISM. They got CISSP earlier in their careers when they were doing technical work, and they added CISM when they moved into management. You’re not choosing one certification for life. You’re choosing which one to pursue first based on where you are now.

If You Work in Consulting

Consulting is a special case. If you work for a cybersecurity consulting firm or you’re an independent consultant, client expectations matter more than your personal preference. Many government contracts and enterprise consulting engagements specifically require CISSP. The Department of Defense’s 8570 directive lists CISSP as an approved certification for Information Assurance Technical roles, which means you need it to work on many federal contracts.

For consulting work focused on security assessments, penetration testing, or technical security implementations, CISSP is the standard. For consulting work focused on security program development, governance advisory, or risk management consulting, CISM carries more weight. Look at the job postings in your target consulting firms and see which certification they emphasize.

Exam Difficulty and Study Commitment

Let me give you the straight truth about exam difficulty, because this matters when you’re planning your certification timeline and deciding what you can realistically commit to right now.

CISSP Exam Format and Challenge

The CISSP exam uses Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT). You’ll answer between 100 and 150 questions, and you have up to three hours to complete the exam. The test adapts based on your answers, getting harder if you’re answering correctly and easier if you’re struggling. You need to perform at or above the passing standard, which ISC2 sets at 700 out of 1000 points using scaled scoring.

The challenge with CISSP is breadth. Eight domains covering everything from cryptography to physical security, from software development to disaster recovery. You can’t just focus on your areas of expertise and hope for the best. You need working knowledge across all domains, even topics you may have never dealt with in your daily work.

Most people spend three to six months studying for CISSP, dedicating around 10 to 15 hours per week. If you’re already working in security and have experience across multiple domains, you might get away with less study time. If security is new to you or you’ve specialized in one narrow area, plan for the longer timeline. For detailed preparation strategies, check out our guide on how long it takes to earn your CISSP.

CISM Exam Format and Challenge

The CISM exam consists of 150 multiple choice questions, and you have four hours to complete it. ISACA uses scaled scoring with a passing score of 450 out of 800 points. The questions are scenario based, testing your ability to make management decisions in realistic situations.

CISM’s challenge is different from CISSP’s. The exam is less about technical depth and more about judgment and experience. Questions often present situations where multiple answers could work, and you need to choose the best approach from a management perspective. If you’ve actually managed security programs, this feels natural. If you haven’t, you’re guessing about how management decisions get made.

Study time for CISM typically runs two to four months with similar weekly commitments. People with management experience often find CISM easier than CISSP because the content aligns with decisions they make daily. People without management experience find it harder because they’re learning an entirely new way of thinking about security problems.

Neither exam is easy. CISSP challenges you with breadth. CISM challenges you with depth of management thinking. Pick the one where you can leverage your existing experience to make studying more efficient and the exam more manageable.

Market Recognition and Job Opportunities

Both certifications open doors, but they open different doors. Understanding which doors you want to walk through matters a lot when deciding which certification to pursue first.

CISSP in the Job Market

CISSP is the most widely recognized security certification in the world. According to ISC2, there are over 450,000 CISSP holders globally. That’s massive market recognition, but it also means competition. You’re competing against a large pool of other certified professionals for positions.

The upside is that CISSP appears in more job postings than any other security certification. Search any major job board for cybersecurity positions, and you’ll see CISSP listed as preferred or required in a huge percentage of postings. Government positions especially favor CISSP because of DoD 8570 and other compliance requirements.

Average salaries for CISSP holders run between $110,000 and $160,000 depending on location, experience, and specific role. Senior positions like Security Architect or Principal Security Engineer can push well above $200,000 with CISSP as part of their credential portfolio.

CISM in the Job Market

CISM has fewer holders globally, around 50,000, which actually works in your favor. There’s less competition for CISM required positions, and employers recognize that CISM holders have genuine management experience, not just exam passing ability.

CISM appears most frequently in management level job postings. Security Manager, Information Security Manager, Director of Security, and CISO positions regularly list CISM as required or strongly preferred. The certification signals that you’re ready for strategic security leadership, not just technical execution.

Salary ranges for CISM holders typically start around $120,000 and go up significantly from there. CISO positions at mid sized to large companies routinely pay $200,000 to $400,000 or more, and CISM is almost always part of the qualification mix for these roles. Data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that information security managers earn median salaries well above $160,000, with top earners exceeding $250,000.

What Job Postings Really Show: I look at security job postings every single day because that’s part of helping our clients figure out their career paths. Here’s what I see. Entry to mid level security positions overwhelmingly prefer CISSP. Senior to executive level positions increasingly prefer CISM, often alongside CISSP. If you want the widest range of opportunities early in your career, start with CISSP. If you’re already in or targeting management, CISM is the better investment.

Cost and Ongoing Requirements

Let’s talk about the financial commitment, because this matters when you’re deciding which certification to pursue first. Both certifications require ongoing investment, not just the initial exam fee.

CISSP Costs

The CISSP exam costs $749 for most candidates. If you’re a U.S. military veteran or active military, ISC2 offers a $50 discount. You’ll also need to budget for study materials, which can range from a few hundred dollars for books and practice exams to a couple thousand dollars if you take an instructor led boot camp.

Once certified, you pay an Annual Maintenance Fee of $125 to ISC2, and you need to earn 120 Continuing Professional Education credits over a three year certification cycle. That averages out to 40 CPE credits per year. You can earn CPEs through training courses, conferences, webinars, publishing articles, or volunteering in security related activities.

CISM Costs

The CISM exam fee is $575 for ISACA members and $760 for non members. If you’re not an ISACA member yet, it’s worth joining before registering for the exam because the membership fee is $135 and you’ll save that on the exam cost. Study materials range from a few hundred to a few thousand dollars depending on your approach.

CISM requires a $45 annual maintenance fee to ISACA (if you’re a member), and you need to earn 20 CPE hours annually, with a minimum of 120 CPE hours over three years. The CPE requirements are similar to CISSP, you can earn them through training, conferences, or professional activities related to information security management.

The real cost isn’t the exam fee or annual maintenance. It’s the time investment in studying and the ongoing commitment to earning CPEs. Both certifications require you to stay current in your field, which is actually a good thing. But make sure you’re picking the certification where the CPE requirements align with training you’d want to do anyway.

Making Your Decision: A Practical Framework

After working with hundreds of professionals making this exact decision, I’ve developed a simple framework that helps people cut through the confusion and make the right choice for their situation. Let me walk you through it.

Start with CISSP If:

You have less than five years of security experience. CISSP gives you the broad foundation you need early in your career, and you can add CISM later when you move into management.

You’re working in technical security roles and want to stay technical. Security architect, penetration tester, security engineer positions all value CISSP more than CISM.

You work for or want to work for federal government or defense contractors. DoD 8570 requirements make CISSP essential for many positions.

You’re looking for the broadest possible job market access. CISSP appears in more job postings than any other security certification.

You want a certification that’s globally recognized across all industries and organization types. CISSP is the gold standard that travels well.

Start with CISM If:

You already hold CISSP and are moving into management roles. This is the natural progression, and CISM complements your existing technical certification perfectly.

You currently work in or are targeting security management positions. Security Manager, Director of Security, or CISO roles strongly favor CISM.

You have genuine management experience in security. CISM requires this experience for certification anyway, and the exam will make much more sense if you’ve actually done the work.

You spend your days on governance, risk management, and program development rather than hands on technical work. CISM validates what you actually do.

You want to differentiate yourself for executive level positions. CISM signals strategic thinking that CISOs and senior security leaders need.

Get Both Eventually If:

You’re aiming for CISO or executive security leadership roles. Most successful CISOs hold both certifications because they demonstrate both technical depth and management capability.

You work in consulting and want maximum flexibility. Having both certifications lets you pursue technical consulting engagements, management advisory work, or anything in between.

You’re building a personal brand as a security expert. The combination of CISSP and CISM establishes you as someone with comprehensive security knowledge and experience.

Real World Guidance: I’ve watched thousands of professionals navigate this decision over my career at Training Camp. The ones who succeed follow a simple pattern. They get CISSP early to establish their technical foundation and open up job opportunities. They gain actual work experience in progressively senior roles. Then they add CISM when they transition into management and can leverage that management experience to pass the exam and use the certification effectively. This staged approach works far better than trying to force CISM too early or avoiding management certifications because you’re comfortable staying technical.

The Bottom Line

CISSP and CISM aren’t competing certifications that force an either or choice for your entire career. They’re complementary credentials that serve different purposes at different career stages. The question isn’t which one is better. The question is which one makes sense for you right now based on your current experience, your immediate career goals, and the type of work you’re actually doing.

For most people early to mid career, CISSP is the right first choice. It gives you broad technical knowledge, opens up the most job opportunities, and provides a solid foundation you can build on throughout your career. CISM comes later when you’ve gained management experience and are ready to validate your strategic security leadership capabilities.

If you’re already in management or rapidly heading there, and you have the required experience, CISM might be your better first move. Just be honest about whether you truly have management experience that qualifies, not just technical security work.

Whatever you decide, commit to the path and get the certification done. The worst decision is spending months or years debating which certification to pursue instead of actually getting certified. Pick the one that fits your current situation, study hard, pass the exam, and start using that certification to advance your career. You can always add the other certification later when it makes sense. For more guidance on building your certification roadmap, explore our detailed comparison of CISM vs CISSP certifications and learn about CISSP requirements and preparation strategies.

Final Advice

I talk to people every week who wasted a year trying to decide between CISSP and CISM when they should have just picked one and moved forward. Both certifications will advance your career. Both require significant study and commitment. Both have ongoing maintenance requirements. The perfect choice doesn’t exist. The right choice is the one that matches where you are now and moves you toward where you want to be. Make the decision, do the work, and get certified.

 

What Cybersecurity Certifications Do Government Contractors Actually Require?

If you want to work on government contracts, especially anything involving the Department of Defense, you need specific cybersecurity certifications. Not just any certifications, the ones that actually appear in contract requirements and qualify you for the work under current DoD regulations.

I’ve spent years working with defense contractors, government agencies, and companies trying to break into this market. The questions are always the same: Which certifications do I actually need? What’s this 8570 thing everyone keeps mentioning? Why does it feel like the requirements change every time I check? The confusion is understandable because the landscape has changed significantly, and a lot of the information floating around online is outdated.

What I’m going to share here is based on what’s actually happening in 2025, the certifications that show up in real contract requirements, and the pathways that make sense for different career stages in government contracting.

Understanding DoD 8140

You’ve probably heard about DoD 8570. That was the old framework that governed information assurance workforce requirements for years. It’s been replaced by DoD 8140, which went into full effect in 2023 and represents a fundamental shift in how the Department of Defense approaches cybersecurity workforce development.

DoD 8140 introduced the DoD Cyberspace Workforce Framework, which covers approximately 225,000 military, civilian, and contractor positions. Instead of the previous Information Assurance Technical and Management levels, the new framework organizes roles into seven workforce elements with specific work roles and qualification requirements for each. The official DoD Cyber Workforce Framework provides detailed documentation of all work roles and their requirements.

For contractors, this means if you’re assigned to a position coded with a DoD Cyberspace Workforce Framework work role, you must meet the foundational and residential qualification requirements for that role. The timeline matters: you have nine months to meet foundational requirements and twelve months for residential requirements after assignment to the role.

The February 15, 2025 deadline just passed for civilian employees and military service members in cybersecurity work roles. By February 15, 2026, everyone in cyberspace IT, cyberspace effects, intelligence, and cyberspace enabler roles needs to be qualified. As a contractor, you need to be ready before you even bid on the work.

The Core Certifications for Government Contractors

The certifications I see most consistently in government contract requirements fall into a clear hierarchy. These are the credentials that show up repeatedly across different agencies, contract types, and security requirements. Understanding which ones align with your career goals and the specific roles you’re targeting makes the difference between spinning your wheels and building a competitive edge.

CompTIA Security Plus

Security Plus serves as the baseline certification for most DoD contractor positions involving cybersecurity work. It’s approved for 31 different work roles under DoD 8140, making it the most broadly applicable entry-level credential. If you’re transitioning into government contracting or starting your career in cybersecurity, Security Plus opens more doors than any other single certification at this level.

The exam covers network security, compliance and operational security, threats and vulnerabilities, application security, and cryptography. Being vendor neutral means you’re not locked into specific technologies, which matters in government environments where you’ll encounter diverse systems and platforms. After you have Security Plus and gain some practical experience, you can build toward more advanced certifications based on your career direction.

CISSP

CISSP covers 44% of approved work roles across five of the seven workforce elements in DoD 8140. For senior positions, management roles, or anything involving security architecture and engineering, CISSP becomes the standard requirement rather than just a nice-to-have credential. ISC2’s CISSP certification has been the gold standard in information security for decades and remains one of the most recognized credentials in government contracting.

CISSP appears consistently in contracts for Information Systems Security Managers, Cybersecurity Architects, and System Security Engineers. The certification requires five years of relevant work experience, which means this isn’t an entry-level credential. It’s what you work toward after you’ve established yourself in the field, and it opens doors to significantly higher compensation levels and more strategic roles.

CISM

If you’re managing security programs rather than implementing technical controls, CISM is your path. It’s specifically designed for security managers and covers information security governance, risk management, incident management, and program development.

CISM works particularly well for contractors supporting program management offices, overseeing security operations centers, or serving in advisory roles to government CISOs. Like CISSP, you need work experience to get certified, five years with at least three years in information security management.

CISA

The audit side. If you’re going to be auditing information systems, conducting security assessments, or ensuring compliance with security requirements, CISA is what you need. It covers IS audit process, IT governance, systems and infrastructure lifecycle management, IT service delivery, and asset protection.

I see CISA requirements most often for contractors supporting Inspector General offices, doing compliance reviews, or working with organizations that need to demonstrate security control effectiveness for authorization to operate.

CEH and Specialized Technical Certifications

Certified Ethical Hacker appears frequently in contracts involving penetration testing, vulnerability assessments, and offensive security operations. While not as broadly applicable as Security Plus or CISSP, CEH becomes essential if you’re pursuing red team work or security testing roles for government systems.

Additional specialized certifications like CompTIA CySA Plus and PenTest Plus cover specific technical focuses for cybersecurity analysts and penetration testers. Cisco’s CCNP Security addresses network security architecture roles. For cloud security positions, the Certified Cloud Security Professional from ISC2 has gained significant traction in government contracting requirements.

Understanding the specific certification requirements in contract language can make or break your ability to compete for work. A recent example: a defense contractor team had excellent technical capabilities and Security Plus certifications, but lost a significant contract opportunity because the requirement specified CISSP for the lead position. The certification gap, which represented perhaps a year of professional development, cost them access to a multi-million dollar opportunity. This underscores why matching your certifications to the actual roles you’re pursuing matters more than simply collecting credentials.

Understanding Work Roles and Qualification Requirements

The DoD Cyberspace Workforce Framework organizes positions into specific work roles, each with defined qualification requirements. Understanding how these work roles translate into actual contract requirements helps you target your certification efforts effectively.

Consider the Cyber Defense Analyst role. The foundational qualifications might accept Security Plus, CySA Plus, or several GIAC certifications. The residential qualifications could require completion of specific DoD or military training courses. Your documented experience matters as well, you need to demonstrate you’ve performed the actual work, not just passed certification exams.

The System Security Engineer role typically requires CISSP or CASP Plus for foundational qualifications, combined with a bachelor’s degree in a relevant field or equivalent military training. The requirements stack: you need the right combination of education, experience, and certifications that align with the specific work role.

One challenge for contractors is that different agencies and different contracts can interpret these requirements with some variation. One contract might accept Security Plus for a Cyber Defense Analyst position, while another might require CySA Plus or higher. Reading the actual contract requirements carefully rather than making assumptions based on general guidance becomes critical.

The CMMC Compliance Requirement

While DoD 8140 addresses individual workforce qualifications, the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification addresses organizational security posture. Both matter equally if you want to work on DoD contracts, and understanding how they interact is important for contractors.

CMMC 2.0 officially started appearing in contracts in November 2025, with a phased implementation running through 2028. Organizations that handle Controlled Unclassified Information need CMMC Level 2 certification, which requires implementing all 110 security controls from NIST SP 800-171. This represents a substantial undertaking, typically requiring six months to a year for most companies to achieve compliance.

The connection to individual certifications matters because the person managing your organization’s CMMC compliance needs appropriate security management credentials, typically CISM, CISSP, or equivalent. If you’re positioning yourself as the security lead for a defense contractor, having these advanced certifications makes you valuable because you can address both workforce compliance requirements and organizational compliance requirements.

Working with organizations pursuing government contracts, I’ve observed a clear pattern: companies that obtain CMMC Level 2 certification and ensure their technical leads hold appropriate advanced certifications like CISSP significantly improve their competitive position. The combination of organizational compliance and properly qualified personnel proves you can perform at the level government contracts require. Without both elements, you’re competing at a disadvantage regardless of your technical capabilities.

Building Your Certification Strategy

Developing an effective certification roadmap depends on your current position, experience level, and the specific government contracting roles you’re targeting. Rather than pursuing certifications randomly, a strategic approach based on career trajectory produces better results.

For Those Beginning Government Contracting Careers

Security Plus provides the foundation that opens the most opportunities at entry and mid levels. It covers the essential knowledge base that government contracting work requires, and the credential appears in more contract requirements than any other entry-level certification.

After obtaining Security Plus and gaining one to two years of practical work experience, evaluate what contracts you’re targeting. Technical implementation roles might benefit from CySA Plus or CASP Plus as your next step. If you’re moving toward management responsibilities, begin building toward CISSP or CISM, keeping in mind both require several years of experience before you can complete certification.

For Experienced Professionals Without Current Certifications

Many talented security professionals have substantial experience but lack the certifications that government contracts require. This creates a gap between capability and eligibility. The solution typically involves pursuing CISSP if you’re technically focused or CISM if you’re on the management track.

Both certifications require documented work experience, but both dramatically expand your contract opportunities. The difference in compensation between positions requiring Security Plus and those requiring CISSP can be substantial, sometimes $50,000 to $60,000 annually. The certification doesn’t necessarily make you better at the work, but it makes you eligible for positions that recognize and compensate advanced expertise.

For Specialized Technical Roles

After establishing foundational certifications, you can pursue specializations based on the specific work you want to perform. Penetration testing roles benefit from CEH or CompTIA PenTest Plus. Cloud security positions increasingly look for CCSP from ISC2. Network security architecture demands Cisco CCNP Security or similar credentials.

The important principle is matching your specialization to actual contract requirements rather than collecting certifications without a clear purpose. Research the work roles you want to fill, identify which certifications appear in those requirements, and build your credentials strategically around those needs.

A typical certification pathway for government contracting involves investments between $3,000 and $8,000 in exam fees, study materials, and training over several years. Some employers cover these costs as part of professional development programs. Many do not. Understanding this financial commitment and factoring it into your career planning helps set realistic expectations. The investment typically pays for itself within the first year through access to higher tier contract opportunities and increased compensation.

Certification Maintenance and Continuing Education

All major cybersecurity certifications require continuing education to maintain active status. CompTIA certifications need renewal every three years through continuing education activities. ISC2 and ISACA certifications require annual continuing professional education credits to remain current.

Government agencies and prime contractors verify certification status, and expired certifications can result in immediate removal from contract work until renewed. This isn’t just administrative overhead. Maintaining certifications ensures you stay current in a rapidly evolving field and can demonstrate ongoing professional development.

Building continuing professional education into your regular routine through conference attendance, training courses, professional writing, and participation in industry organizations serves dual purposes. It maintains your certifications while genuinely keeping your skills and knowledge relevant to current threats and technologies.

What the Future Looks Like

The DoD keeps evolving these requirements because threats keep evolving. We’re already seeing new work roles being added to the framework for artificial intelligence security, which is why ISACA launched the AAISM certification in 2025. Cloud security requirements keep expanding. Zero trust architecture is becoming standard across government systems.

If you’re planning a long career in government contracting, understand that you’ll need to keep learning and keep adding certifications as the field develops. The certifications that got you in the door five years ago might not be enough to keep you competitive five years from now.

Watch what certifications start appearing in contract requirements. When you see a new one showing up repeatedly, that’s your signal to investigate whether you should add it to your toolkit. The contractors who stay ahead of these trends are the ones who stay employed.

Making Your Certifications Actually Work for You

Having the right certifications gets you past the initial screening. It doesn’t guarantee you’ll win contracts or get hired. I’ve seen plenty of people with impressive certification collections who can’t get work because they don’t know how to position themselves.

When you’re responding to contracts or talking to prime contractors, be specific about your qualifications. Don’t just list your certifications. Explain which DoD 8140 work roles you’re qualified for. Show that you understand the framework and can immediately step into the positions they need to fill.

If your organization needs CMMC certification, position yourself as someone who understands both sides of compliance. Having CISSP or CISM makes you valuable not just as a technical resource but as someone who can help manage the overall security program.

Build relationships with prime contractors before you need them. Attend industry days, participate in contractor meetups, get connected with companies that regularly win government work. When they need someone with your skill set and certifications, you want to be the person they think of immediately.

Building a Sustainable Government Contracting Career

Government contracting offers competitive compensation, meaningful work supporting national security, and career stability when you have the right qualifications. Starting with Security Plus provides the foundation. Adding CISSP or CISM after gaining sufficient experience opens doors to senior positions. Maintaining current certifications and staying aware of evolving market requirements positions you for long-term success. These certifications serve as tools for building a substantial career, not just credentials to check boxes on contract requirements. They validate your ability to perform work that genuinely matters for national security and critical government operations. For more detailed guidance on specific certification pathways, our articles on CISM vs CISSP and how to pass CompTIA Security Plus provide additional strategic insights.

 

Wi-Fi 7 Is Here: What IT Professionals Need to Know About the Next Wireless Standard

 

Wi-Fi 7 is here. IT teams everywhere are getting the same questions from leadership: should we upgrade now or wait? The IEEE approved 802.11be last September, certified devices started shipping earlier this year, and manufacturers are pushing hard. But here’s the thing about hype: it doesn’t equal readiness. After spending decades helping organizations figure out technology transitions, I’ve learned the right answer depends entirely on what problems you’re actually trying to solve.

At Training Camp, we design certification programs around practical implementation, not just theory. When we built our network certification curriculum, we hammered on one idea: understanding when technologies provide real value versus when they just look impressive on paper. Wi-Fi 7 fits right into this conversation. The performance gains are legit, but they come with infrastructure requirements and costs that make careful evaluation essential.

What Wi-Fi 7 Actually Does

Wi-Fi 7 hits a theoretical maximum of 46 Gbps, which sounds great until you remember theoretical maximums rarely show up in production. Real world testing from CableLabs and the Wireless Broadband Alliance shows actual speeds consistently above 3.5 Gbps in residential settings. Enterprise implementations do better under controlled conditions. That’s a solid improvement over Wi-Fi 6E, but you need the right conditions to see it.

Three changes drive the improvements. First, Wi-Fi 7 uses 320 MHz channels in the 6 GHz band, double what Wi-Fi 6E offers. Wider channels equal more simultaneous data transmission. Second, it implements 4K QAM modulation, packing more data into each transmission than the 1K QAM in Wi-Fi 6. This denser modulation needs cleaner signals to work, which is why proper RF planning matters more now. Third, multi-link operation is the biggest shift. It lets devices use multiple frequency bands at once instead of switching between them, which cuts latency way down for applications that can’t tolerate delays.

Preamble puncturing is clever. Access points can work around interference by blocking affected parts of a channel while using the clean sections. In crowded office buildings, this prevents one interference source from killing your entire channel. Multiple resource units extend the OFDMA capabilities from Wi-Fi 6, letting a single user grab multiple resource units when they need serious bandwidth. Restricted target wake time adds smarts for latency sensitive traffic, letting access points reserve channel access for high priority packets. According to Cisco’s implementation guidance, this really helps healthcare facilities, trading floors, and industrial environments where milliseconds count.

When we train network professionals, we spend a lot of time on matching capabilities to actual requirements. A feature that sounds impressive in a vendor presentation means nothing if your environment doesn’t need it. Wi-Fi 7’s multi-link operation fundamentally changes wireless performance, but only if your applications actually benefit from simultaneous multi-band connectivity.

Your Infrastructure Needs an Upgrade Too

Power over Ethernet requirements jump with Wi-Fi 7. Wi-Fi 5 access points ran on 802.3at delivering 15 to 30 watts. Wi-Fi 7 access points often need 802.3bt providing 60 watts or more. That extra power supports multiple radio chains across three bands plus features like integrated sensors and IoT connectivity. If your switches can’t deliver 802.3bt, you need infrastructure upgrades before you can even deploy Wi-Fi 7 access points. For large deployments, that’s not a small cost.

Backhaul capacity becomes critical when access points push multi-gigabit wireless speeds. Your wired infrastructure has to keep pace. Most enterprise Wi-Fi 7 access points include multi-gig Ethernet ports, typically 2.5 Gbps or 5 Gbps, with some supporting 10 Gbps uplinks. Cat5e cable limits you to 1 Gbps, which immediately creates a bottleneck. Cat6 handles 5 Gbps over shorter distances. Cat6a supports 10 Gbps up to 100 meters. For many organizations, cabling upgrades represent a huge chunk of total deployment costs, sometimes more than the access points themselves.

Regulatory stuff around 6 GHz operation varies by region and keeps changing. The FCC opened 1200 MHz of spectrum in the 6 GHz band for unlicensed use here in the States, but standard power operation requires Automated Frequency Coordination to prevent interference. Low power indoor operation works without AFC but seriously limits range. Other countries have different regulations, and some regions haven’t allocated 6 GHz spectrum for Wi-Fi at all. You need to understand your regulatory environment to know which Wi-Fi 7 features you can actually use.

Enterprise wireless deployments typically run on five to seven year refresh cycles. If you deployed Wi-Fi 6 within the past three years and it’s meeting performance requirements, there’s no compelling reason to rip and replace. Plan Wi-Fi 7 for your next scheduled refresh and use that time to upgrade supporting infrastructure so you’re ready when the cycle hits.

Where the Market Stands

The Wi-Fi Alliance started certifying devices in January 2024, and the ecosystem has grown throughout 2025. Major manufacturers including TP-Link, ASUS, Netgear, and Cisco now offer Wi-Fi 7 products across consumer and enterprise lines. Intel integrated Wi-Fi 7 into its Core Ultra Series 2 processors. Most premium laptops shipping this year include Wi-Fi 7 capability. The client ecosystem is maturing faster than previous wireless generations, mainly because manufacturers see Wi-Fi 7 as a competitive edge.

Market forecasts suggest Wi-Fi 7 will hit somewhere between 10 and 17 percent of enterprise access point shipments by year end, climbing to around 50 percent by 2027. This adoption curve runs faster than Wi-Fi 6 did, likely because organizations that invested in Wi-Fi 6E already get 6 GHz operation and see Wi-Fi 7 as incremental rather than revolutionary. The Wi-Fi Alliance is projecting over 2.1 billion Wi-Fi 7 devices shipping by 2028, which tells you the industry is pretty confident about mainstream adoption.

Pricing has improved a lot since early products launched. Enterprise Wi-Fi 7 access points from vendors like Aruba and Cisco now cost roughly 20 to 30 percent more than comparable Wi-Fi 6E models. Early 2024 saw premiums of 50 to 60 percent. Consumer mesh systems retail around $1,000 for a two pack, competitive with high end Wi-Fi 6E systems. As manufacturing scales and competition heats up, these price gaps will keep narrowing. But premium pricing still exists, and organizations need to weigh whether the performance gains justify the extra cost.

Who Benefits Right Now

High density venues see real improvements. Stadiums, conference centers, large office spaces benefit from better concurrent user handling. The combination of wider channels, improved OFDMA, and multi-link operation lets access points serve more clients at once while maintaining per-user performance. If you’re dealing with capacity constraints in your current wireless network, Wi-Fi 7 deserves a hard look.

Latency sensitive applications are another clear win. Healthcare facilities running real time patient monitoring, manufacturing environments with automated systems, financial services firms supporting trading applications all need consistent, low latency wireless. For these environments, Wi-Fi 7’s restricted target wake time and multi-link operation provide reliability that previous standards couldn’t match. Organizations supporting AR, VR, or mixed reality applications will find the bandwidth and low latency particularly valuable. These applications demand sustained high throughput with minimal jitter, exactly what Wi-Fi 7 delivers.

Environments where users routinely work with large files benefit from the raw speed. Video production facilities, architectural firms, research labs. A 15 GB file that takes a minute to download over Wi-Fi 6 completes in roughly 25 seconds over Wi-Fi 7 under ideal conditions. That’s not just faster, it changes workflows and affects productivity. Forward looking organizations might choose Wi-Fi 7 now even if current needs don’t strictly require it. Access point refresh cycles span five to seven years. Application demands three years from now will likely be heavier than today. Deploying Wi-Fi 7 infrastructure positions you to support emerging use cases without premature hardware refreshes. This approach makes particular sense for large scale deployments where migration costs are substantial and disruptive.

When to Hold Off

If you recently upgraded to Wi-Fi 6 or 6E and users aren’t complaining about performance, your current infrastructure has several more years of life. The benefits of Wi-Fi 7 over Wi-Fi 6E aren’t dramatic enough to justify premature replacement for most environments. Put your budget toward other network improvements that deliver more immediate value.

Small offices and environments with modest wireless demands won’t see much difference between Wi-Fi 6E and Wi-Fi 7. If you’re supporting fifty users doing typical office applications, Wi-Fi 6E already gives you more capacity than you need. The extra capabilities of Wi-Fi 7 remain largely untapped in low density environments. Organizations without existing 6 GHz infrastructure might want to wait for prices to stabilize more. While Wi-Fi 7 equipment costs have come down, they still command premiums over mature Wi-Fi 6E products. If you’re running Wi-Fi 5 and planning an upgrade, Wi-Fi 6E might offer better value today, with Wi-Fi 7 as a future consideration. The jump from Wi-Fi 5 to Wi-Fi 6E is already substantial.

Think about your client device ecosystem before deploying Wi-Fi 7 infrastructure. If most endpoints are Wi-Fi 5 or Wi-Fi 6 devices with another two to three years before replacement, they can’t take advantage of Wi-Fi 7 features anyway. Backward compatibility works fine, but you’re paying for capabilities your clients can’t use. Time your wireless infrastructure upgrades to align with client device refresh cycles for maximum efficiency and return on investment.

Building the Right Skills

As Wi-Fi 7 deployments pick up, network professionals need updated knowledge about implementation and optimization. The fundamentals haven’t changed. Good RF design, proper channel planning, capacity analysis all remain critical regardless of which Wi-Fi generation you’re deploying. But Wi-Fi 7 introduces variables that need specific expertise. Understanding how to optimize 320 MHz channels, configure multi-link operation, troubleshoot 6 GHz spectrum issues all require focused learning and hands on practice.

Professional certifications are adding Wi-Fi 7 content to their curriculum. The CompTIA Network+ certification covers wireless networking fundamentals that apply across all Wi-Fi generations, giving you a solid foundation for understanding how these technologies work. For professionals specializing in wireless, vendor specific certifications from Cisco, Aruba, and others now include Wi-Fi 7 modules. These programs go deeper into implementation details, configuration best practices, and troubleshooting methodologies specific to Wi-Fi 7 deployments.

Hands on experience beats classroom training every time. If you’re planning Wi-Fi 7 deployments, start with a pilot in a controlled environment. Deploy a few access points, test different configurations, measure actual performance, identify unexpected challenges before rolling out across your whole organization. This practical experience builds expertise that no classroom can fully replicate. Document what you learn and share knowledge across your team to develop organizational competency rather than depending on individual expertise.

Wi-Fi 7 represents where wireless networking is right now, but it’s not the end. The IEEE is already working on 802.11bn, sometimes called Wi-Fi 8, which will focus on improving spectrum efficiency and reliability rather than chasing higher peak speeds. That standard won’t be done until at least 2028, giving Wi-Fi 7 several years as the premium option. For organizations investing in Wi-Fi 7 today, this technology will serve well into the 2030s. The bigger trend is wireless technologies working together more seamlessly. Wi-Fi coexists with cellular networks, private 5G, Bluetooth, emerging standards. Network professionals increasingly need to understand multiple wireless technologies and how to build solutions that leverage each one’s strengths. As IT professionals keep developing their skills, staying current with standards like Wi-Fi 7 helps them guide their organizations through ongoing technology transitions. For those looking to build comprehensive networking knowledge, our guide to IT certifications can help map out a strategic learning path.

 

Why Authorized Training Partners Matter for IT Certifications

The IT certification market has changed dramatically over the past decade. Alongside reputable training providers, a growing number of shortcuts, memorization sites, and questionable prep services have emerged. If you’re pursuing certifications like CISSP, Security+, or CISM, understanding the difference between legitimate training and these alternatives can determine whether you actually build skills or just pass a test.

After working with thousands of certification candidates, I’ve seen both paths play out. One leads to genuine competence and career growth. The other creates a façade that crumbles during interviews or on the job. Here’s what you need to know about choosing training that actually prepares you for real world work.

What Makes Training Legitimate

Authorized training partners work directly with certification bodies like CompTIA, ISC2, and ISACA to deliver instruction that aligns with official standards. This relationship means using verified curriculum, maintaining instructor qualifications, and adhering to quality benchmarks that protect the integrity of the certification itself.

When you learn through authorized channels, you’re working with materials developed specifically to cover the full body of knowledge each certification requires. These aren’t simplified summaries or test prep shortcuts. They’re comprehensive learning resources designed to build the competence that employers expect when they see a certification on your resume.

The instructors teaching these programs hold the certifications themselves and bring practical experience from working in the field. When you’re learning about incident response in a CISSP program, you’re hearing from someone who has actually managed security incidents. When you’re covering network security in Security+, the instruction comes from professionals who implement these concepts daily.

Authorized training isn’t just about passing an exam. It’s about building skills you’ll use throughout your career. The difference becomes obvious when you’re in an interview or tackling real security challenges at work.

The Problem with Brain Dumps and Memorization Sites

Brain dump sites market themselves as efficient study tools, but they fundamentally undermine the purpose of certification. These platforms collect actual exam questions through various means and package them as study materials. The result is candidates who memorize specific answers without understanding the underlying concepts.

This approach creates multiple problems. First, it leaves you unprepared for the actual job. Certification exams test knowledge that translates directly to workplace scenarios. When you bypass the learning process, you show up to work with credentials but without competence.

Second, it damages your professional reputation. Hiring managers have become skilled at identifying candidates who memorized dumps versus those who genuinely understand the material. During technical interviews, the difference becomes immediately apparent. You might pass the certification exam, but you won’t pass the interview.

Third, it violates the ethical standards that most certifications require. Organizations like ISC2, CompTIA, and ISACA maintain codes of conduct that explicitly prohibit using brain dumps. Getting caught can result in certification revocation and permanent bans from future testing.

What I See in the Field: Employers are increasingly skeptical of certifications when candidates can’t demonstrate basic understanding during interviews. This skepticism hurts everyone who holds these credentials legitimately. The value of certification depends on it representing genuine knowledge, not memorization ability.

How Effective Training Actually Works

Quality certification training starts with comprehensive curriculum that covers the full scope of knowledge required. Rather than focusing narrowly on exam questions, legitimate programs teach you the concepts, principles, and practices that make you effective in your role.

Hands on experience is essential. Reading about security concepts or network configurations isn’t enough. You need to actually work with the technologies, troubleshoot problems, and apply what you’re learning to realistic scenarios. Effective training programs incorporate labs, simulations, and practical exercises that mirror what you’ll encounter professionally.

Practice assessments serve a different purpose than brain dumps. Rather than exposing you to actual exam questions, they test your understanding of concepts in various contexts. You’re learning to think critically about security, networking, or systems administration, not memorizing specific question formats.

Instructor expertise makes a significant difference. Learning from practitioners who apply these concepts daily provides context that no textbook can match. They can explain not just what the official answer is, but why it matters in real implementations and what challenges you’ll face applying it.

Red Flags When Choosing Certification Prep

Certain warning signs indicate training that won’t serve you well. If a provider promises you’ll pass complex certifications with minimal study time, that’s unrealistic. Advanced certifications like CISSP require substantial preparation. Anyone suggesting otherwise is either misleading you or offering memorization shortcuts that won’t build real competence.

Claims about having real exam questions or actual test answers indicate brain dumps. Legitimate practice questions teach concepts. Stolen exam content teaches memorization. The distinction matters tremendously for your career.

Check whether a training provider is listed as authorized by the certification body. CompTIA, ISC2, and ISACA maintain directories of approved partners. If a provider isn’t listed but claims to offer official training, they’re operating outside proper channels.

Extremely low prices often signal low quality or questionable methods. Quality instruction requires expert instructors, proper materials, adequate lab environments, and ongoing updates as certification requirements evolve. These elements cost money to deliver properly.

Programs that accept anyone without prerequisites for advanced certifications may not be setting you up for success. Certifications build on foundational knowledge. A CISM or CISSP preparation program that doesn’t assess your readiness isn’t doing you any favors. Understanding the time commitment required for advanced certifications can help you evaluate whether a program’s timeline is realistic.

Why This Matters for Your Career

The way you prepare for certification directly impacts how much value you get from it. When you invest time in legitimate training, you’re building skills that translate immediately to better job performance. You understand not just what to do, but why you’re doing it and how to adapt when circumstances change.

Proper preparation gives you confidence during interviews. You can discuss concepts in depth, answer scenario-based questions, and demonstrate genuine understanding. Hiring managers recognize this depth immediately and distinguish it from candidates who clearly memorized dumps.

Your professional reputation depends on being able to back up your certifications with real competence. When colleagues ask you questions related to your credentials, you want to have substantive answers. When projects require the skills your certifications supposedly validate, you want to actually possess those skills.

Long term career growth comes from genuine expertise, not credential collection. Certifications open doors, but your ability to perform determines whether you advance. Training that builds real competence sets you up for sustained success rather than short term gains.

Certification is an investment in your future. Like any investment, the quality of what you put in determines what you get out. Choose training that develops your skills, not just your resume.

What to Look for in Quality Training

When evaluating training options, several factors indicate quality and effectiveness. Official curriculum alignment ensures you’re learning what the certification actually tests. Materials should be current, comprehensive, and developed with input from the certification body.

Instructor qualifications matter significantly. Look for instructors who hold the certifications they teach and bring practical experience from the field. Their real world perspective helps connect theoretical concepts to actual implementation.

Hands on components separate effective training from pure theory. Labs, simulations, and practical exercises give you experience applying concepts before you encounter them professionally. This experiential learning builds confidence and competence simultaneously.

Multiple delivery formats accommodate different learning styles and schedules. Some people thrive in intensive bootcamps. Others need flexible self-paced options. Quality providers offer various formats while maintaining consistent standards across all of them.

Ongoing support extends learning beyond the classroom. Access to instructors after training ends, updated materials as certifications evolve, and community connections with other professionals all add value that continues throughout your career.

From Experience: The most successful certification candidates treat preparation as skill development, not test prep. They engage deeply with the material, practice extensively, and build understanding that lasts beyond exam day. This approach takes more time upfront but pays dividends throughout their careers.

The Changing Landscape of Certification

Certification bodies continue evolving their programs to maintain relevance and integrity. Performance-based testing, adaptive question formats, and larger question pools all make memorization approaches less effective. These changes benefit candidates who learn properly because they’re testing actual understanding rather than recall.

Technology enables better training delivery. Virtual labs provide hands on experience without expensive infrastructure. Online platforms connect students with expert instructors regardless of geography. Adaptive learning systems can personalize instruction to individual needs and learning pace.

Employers are becoming more sophisticated about evaluating certifications. They’re looking beyond credentials on resumes to assess actual competence through technical interviews, practical assessments, and reference checks. This trend favors candidates who developed genuine skills during their certification journey.

The market increasingly recognizes and rewards professionals with verified expertise. As brain dumps become less effective and easier to detect, the value gap widens between those who learned properly and those who took shortcuts. This creates opportunity for professionals who invest in legitimate training.

Making the Right Choice

If you’re pursuing IT certification, you face a choice between genuine learning and shortcuts. The shortcut might seem appealing, especially when you’re busy or feeling pressure to get certified quickly. But shortcuts create fragile credentials that crumble under scrutiny.

Legitimate training requires more time and effort upfront. You’ll study harder, practice more, and engage more deeply with the material. The payoff is competence that serves you throughout your career, confidence that carries you through interviews, and credentials that truly represent your capabilities.

Choose training providers carefully. Look for authorized partnerships, qualified instructors, comprehensive curriculum, and hands on components. Ask about pass rates, but also ask about graduate outcomes. The best measure of training quality is whether alumni succeed professionally, not just whether they pass exams.

Invest in your professional development with the same seriousness you’d apply to any significant career decision. Your certifications represent your expertise to employers, colleagues, and clients. Make sure that representation is accurate and that you can back it up with genuine knowledge. If you’re weighing different certification paths, resources like our guide on Security+ vs CISSP can help you understand which credential aligns best with your career stage and goals.

Final Thoughts

Certification remains one of the most effective ways to advance in IT and cybersecurity. The key is approaching it as skill development rather than credential collection. When you choose quality training and put in the work to truly learn, certification becomes a catalyst for career growth rather than just another line on your resume. For professionals ready to invest in training that builds real expertise, explore our comprehensive guide to IT certifications and find the path that aligns with your career goals.

 

ITIL 4: What Every IT Professional Should Know

I’ve been selling IT training and certifications long enough to know when someone’s eyes are about to glaze over. And nothing makes that happen faster than mentioning ITIL. I get it. The acronym sounds boring. The concept sounds corporate. And honestly, a lot of people think it’s just another framework that consultants push to justify their fees.

But here’s what I tell every client who walks through our door, from Fortune 500 companies to small startups trying to scale: ITIL 4 is the difference between IT teams that put out fires all day and IT teams that actually deliver value. It’s not sexy. It’s not flashy. But it works. And after helping hundreds of organizations implement ITIL practices, I can tell you it’s one of the smartest investments an IT department can make.

What ITIL Actually Is (Without the Corporate Speak)

ITIL stands for Information Technology Infrastructure Library, though honestly, nobody calls it that anymore. It’s just ITIL. Think of it as the playbook for IT service management. It started back in the 1980s when the UK government realized their IT projects were a mess and needed a systematic way to manage things. Fast forward to today, and ITIL 4, released in 2019, is the most widely adopted IT service management framework in the world.

Here’s the simple version: ITIL gives you a structured approach to delivering IT services that actually meet business needs. Instead of your IT team scrambling every time something breaks or a new request comes in, ITIL provides proven processes for everything from handling incidents to managing changes to planning capacity. It’s the difference between playing defense all the time and actually having a strategy.

What I love about ITIL 4 specifically is that it’s not the rigid, process heavy framework people remember from earlier versions. The latest version is designed for the digital age. It works with Agile, DevOps, and modern development practices. It’s flexible enough to adapt to your organization instead of forcing you into a one size fits all box.

Why Companies Actually Implement ITIL (The Real Reasons)

When I sit down with potential clients, they rarely start the conversation by saying “we need ITIL.” What they say is: “Our IT team is overwhelmed,” or “We keep having the same problems over and over,” or “We can’t keep up with business demands.” Those are ITIL problems, even if they don’t know it yet.

The real value of ITIL shows up in three areas that every organization cares about: reducing costs, improving reliability, and delivering services faster. Let me break those down because they’re not abstract benefits. They’re measurable improvements that show up in your budget and your users’ satisfaction scores.

First, reducing costs. This one surprises people because ITIL requires an upfront investment in training and process development. But here’s what happens: when you have standardized processes for handling incidents, changes, and problems, you eliminate a ton of wasted effort. Your team stops reinventing the wheel for every issue. You catch problems before they become expensive emergencies. You make smarter decisions about where to invest resources. I’ve seen organizations cut their operational IT costs by 15% to 20% within a year of implementing ITIL properly.

Second, improving reliability. ITIL’s change management and incident management practices are designed to reduce downtime. When you have structured processes for testing changes, rolling them out, and responding to incidents, services stay up and running. One of my favorite success stories was a healthcare client who reduced their critical system outages from monthly occurrences to maybe once or twice a year after implementing ITIL change management. That’s real impact on patient care.

Third, delivering services faster. This seems counterintuitive because processes feel like they slow things down. But the opposite is true when you do it right. ITIL 4’s service value chain approach helps teams understand how to move from demand to delivery efficiently. You eliminate bottlenecks. You clarify roles and responsibilities. You build repeatable patterns for common requests. The result? Your team spends less time figuring out what to do and more time actually doing it.

The ITIL 4 Service Value System: How It Actually Works

ITIL 4 is built around something called the Service Value System, or SVS. Don’t let the fancy name throw you. It’s actually pretty straightforward once you break it down. The SVS shows how all the pieces of service management work together to create value. Think of it as the blueprint for your IT organization.

At the heart of the SVS are seven guiding principles. These are the foundation that everything else builds on. Focus on value. Start where you are. Progress iteratively with feedback. Collaborate and promote visibility. Think and work holistically. Keep it simple and practical. Optimize and automate. These aren’t just platitudes. They’re decision making frameworks that help you navigate the messy reality of IT operations.

The service value chain is where work actually flows through your organization. It’s got six activities: plan, improve, engage, design and transition, obtain and build, deliver and support. Every service or product your IT team delivers goes through some combination of these activities. The beauty is that ITIL doesn’t dictate exactly how you do each activity. It gives you practices and guidance, but you adapt them to your context.

Then you’ve got the 34 ITIL practices. These used to be called processes in older versions, but calling them practices is more accurate. They’re proven ways of accomplishing specific objectives. Some of the most important ones that nearly every organization implements are incident management (handling disruptions to services), change management (controlling modifications to IT infrastructure), and service desk (the single point of contact for users). But there are practices for everything from capacity planning to information security management to software development.

Here’s something I always tell clients when they’re getting started: you don’t implement all 34 practices on day one. Nobody does. You start with the ones that solve your biggest pain points. Usually that’s incident management, service desk, and change management. Get those working well, then expand. ITIL is a journey, not a destination.

ITIL Certification: Is It Worth Your Time and Money?

This is the question I get asked constantly, especially from individuals trying to figure out their next career move. The short answer? Yes, if you’re in IT operations, service management, or any role that touches IT service delivery. Let me explain why.

ITIL 4 Foundation is the entry level certification. It proves you understand the basic concepts, terminology, and structure of ITIL. The exam isn’t particularly difficult if you prepare properly. Most people study for 20 to 40 hours, take a boot camp or self paced course, and pass. Cost wise, you’re looking at $300 to $500 if you self study, or up to $1,500 if you want instructor led training with the exam included.

Why is it worth it? Two reasons. First, ITIL Foundation is increasingly showing up as “required” or “preferred” in job descriptions for service desk roles, IT operations positions, and anything involving service management. It’s become table stakes for a lot of positions. Second, professionals with ITIL certification earn 5% to 15% more than their non certified peers. That pays for the certification pretty quickly.

Beyond Foundation, you can pursue the ITIL Managing Professional track if you’re a practitioner who implements ITIL day to day, or the ITIL Strategic Leader track if you’re focused on the business and strategic aspects. If you complete both tracks, you qualify for ITIL Master, which is the highest level. These advanced certifications are more expensive and time intensive, but they’re valuable if you’re serious about a career in IT service management.

Common ITIL Mistakes (And How to Avoid Them)

I’ve seen enough ITIL implementations to know what works and what doesn’t. Let me save you some pain by highlighting the mistakes that sink projects.

Mistake number one: trying to implement everything at once. Organizations get excited, send a bunch of people to training, buy ITSM software, and try to roll out every ITIL practice simultaneously. It never works. You overwhelm your team, nobody does anything well, and people get frustrated. Start small. Pick two or three practices that address your biggest problems. Get those running smoothly. Then expand. This might take a year or two, and that’s fine.

Mistake number two: treating ITIL as an IT only initiative. ITIL is about delivering services that meet business needs. If you implement it in a vacuum without involving business stakeholders, you’ll build processes that look good on paper but don’t actually help anyone. Get business leaders involved early. Make sure they understand what you’re trying to accomplish and how it benefits them.

Mistake number three: following ITIL too rigidly. Remember, ITIL is guidance, not law. The framework gives you best practices, but every organization is different. You need to adapt ITIL to your context, your culture, and your specific needs. Don’t implement something just because “that’s what ITIL says.” Implement it because it solves a problem you actually have.

Mistake number four: forgetting about continual improvement. ITIL isn’t something you implement once and forget about. It’s a continuous cycle of measuring, learning, and improving. Build mechanisms for collecting feedback, analyzing metrics, and making adjustments. If you’re not regularly reviewing and improving your processes, you’re not really doing ITIL.

ITIL and Modern IT: DevOps, Agile, and Cloud

One pushback I hear, especially from younger IT professionals, is that ITIL is old school and doesn’t fit with modern practices like DevOps, Agile, or cloud computing. That used to be a fair criticism of ITIL v3. But ITIL 4 was specifically designed to work with these approaches.

ITIL 4 and DevOps complement each other beautifully. DevOps focuses on speed, automation, and collaboration between development and operations. ITIL provides the governance, risk management, and service management structure that prevents DevOps teams from moving fast and breaking things. You can have rapid deployment cycles and still maintain proper change control. You can automate incident response and still track metrics and learn from problems.

Agile development and ITIL work together too. Agile gives you the framework for building software iteratively and responding to change. ITIL gives you the practices for managing that software in production, handling service requests, and ensuring services meet business needs. They’re solving different problems.

Cloud computing actually makes ITIL more relevant, not less. When your infrastructure is spread across multiple cloud providers, with services spinning up and down dynamically, you need strong service management even more. ITIL’s practices for service catalog management, capacity planning, and cost optimization become critical in cloud environments where costs can spiral out of control if you’re not careful.

Getting Started with ITIL: Practical First Steps

If I’ve convinced you that ITIL is worth exploring, here’s how to actually get started without getting overwhelmed.

Step one: assess where you are. Before you start implementing anything, understand your current state. What processes do you already have? What’s working? What’s broken? What are your biggest pain points? You don’t need a formal maturity assessment, though those can be helpful. Just an honest look at your current situation.

Step two: get educated. If nobody on your team knows ITIL, send a few key people to ITIL 4 Foundation training. This doesn’t need to be everyone. You need enough people who understand the framework to guide the implementation and speak the language. Three to five people is usually enough for a small to medium organization.

Step three: pick your starting practices. Based on your assessment, choose two or three ITIL practices that will have the biggest impact. For most organizations, this is service desk, incident management, and either change management or request fulfillment. These are foundational practices that directly improve day to day operations.

Step four: define your processes. Take the ITIL guidance for your chosen practices and adapt it to your environment. Document your processes simply. Create workflows. Define roles and responsibilities. But keep it practical. A three page process document is better than a 30 page one that nobody reads.

Step five: implement with proper tooling. ITIL is tool agnostic, but you need supporting technology. For most organizations, that means an ITSM platform like ServiceNow, Jira Service Management, or similar. The tool should enable your processes, not dictate them. Choose software that fits your size and complexity.

Step six: measure and improve. From day one, define the metrics you’ll use to measure success. Resolution time for incidents. Change success rate. User satisfaction scores. Track those metrics consistently and use them to identify where you need to improve.

My Two Cents: The organizations that succeed with ITIL are the ones that treat it as a means to an end, not the end itself. The goal isn’t to “do ITIL.” The goal is to deliver better IT services that support business objectives. ITIL is just the proven path to get there. Keep that in mind and you’ll avoid most of the pitfalls.

The organizations that succeed with ITIL are the ones that treat it as a means to an end, not the end itself. The goal isn’t to “do ITIL.” The goal is to deliver better IT services that support business objectives. ITIL is just the proven path to get there. I’ve seen it transform chaotic IT departments into well oiled machines. I’ve watched service desk teams go from drowning in tickets to proactively managing services. I’ve seen CIOs use ITIL to finally demonstrate IT’s value to the business in terms executives understand.

Is it perfect? No. Does it solve every problem? No. But if you’re in IT and you’re struggling with any aspect of service delivery, ITIL probably has a practice that addresses it. The framework has been refined over 30 plus years with input from thousands of organizations. That’s a lot of collective wisdom.

Whether you’re an individual looking to advance your career or an organization trying to improve IT operations, ITIL is worth your time. Start with Foundation certification if you’re new to it. Talk to someone who’s actually implemented it if you’re considering it for your organization. And remember, success is 105% about wearing the right shoes. In this case, the right shoes are ITIL 4. For anyone looking to build a comprehensive IT skill set, consider exploring other IT certifications that complement ITIL and strengthen your overall capabilities.

 

The Women Who Built the Tech World

 

I was sitting in a café in Prague last month, halfway through my second espresso, when I overheard a conversation at the next table. A group of computer science students were talking about tech pioneers. Steve Jobs came up. Bill Gates. Elon Musk. The usual suspects. When one student asked if anyone could name a woman who shaped technology, the table went quiet. That silence stuck with me for days.

Here’s the thing that gets me. The first programmer in history was a woman. The person who invented the compiler? Woman. The code that landed humans on the moon? Written by a woman. These aren’t minor contributions or footnotes. These women built the foundation of everything we do in IT today. Yet most people couldn’t name a single one if their laptop depended on it.

The Women Who Invented Programming

Let me take you back to 1843, a hundred years before anyone built an electronic computer. Ada Lovelace was the daughter of Lord Byron, the famous poet, though she barely knew him. Her mother pushed her toward mathematics, probably hoping logic would counteract any inherited dramatic tendencies. Ada became fascinated with Charles Babbage’s Analytical Engine, this incredible mechanical calculator that existed mostly on paper and in Babbage’s imagination.

While Babbage saw his machine as a glorified calculator, Ada saw something nobody else could. She understood that anything you could represent with numbers, a machine could manipulate: music, images, text, anything. She wrote what we now recognize as the first computer algorithm, complete with the concept of looping. She invented programming a century before computers existed. When I’m troubleshooting code at 2am in some hotel room, I sometimes think about Ada working by candlelight, imagining a future none of her contemporaries could see. She died at 36. The Defense Department eventually named a programming language after her, which is nice, but it’s not enough.

Jump forward to World War II. Grace Hopper had a math PhD from Yale, already unusual for a woman in 1934, and joined the Navy when the war started. She got assigned to program the Harvard Mark I, this massive computer that filled a room. She didn’t just program it. She wrote a 500 page manual for it, though her name didn’t appear on the cover. That happened a lot back then.

What Grace really changed was how we think about code. Early programming meant writing in machine language, ones and zeros corresponding directly to circuit operations. It was tedious and error prone. Grace thought that was absurd. She built the first compiler in 1952, translating human readable instructions into machine code. When she proposed it, people told her computers couldn’t do that. She proved them wrong. Her work led to COBOL, which used actual English words instead of cryptic symbols. COBOL still runs critical systems today, over 60 years later. Grace became a Rear Admiral and kept working until she was 79. The famous “bug” story? That was her, finding an actual moth in the Mark II computer.

Here’s what makes me angry. During WWII and the early computing days, programming was considered clerical work, basically typing. That meant it was women’s work, beneath the men doing the “real” engineering of building hardware. So women programmed the most important computers of the era. Six women figured out how to program ENIAC, the first general purpose electronic computer, using patch cables and inventing modern programming techniques from scratch. Betty Snyder, Betty Jean Jennings, Kathleen McNulty, Marlyn Wescoff, Ruth Lichterman, and Frances Bilas. They got almost no recognition.

Then, when everyone realized programming required serious intellectual work, suddenly it became men’s work. Women got pushed out of the field they’d pioneered. By the 1980s, computers were marketed as toys for boys, computer science programs skewed male, and we’ve been fighting for equity ever since. The gender ratio in computer science today is actually worse than it was in the 1960s. Think about that for a minute.

Katherine Johnson’s story shows what women accomplished even when the system was stacked against them in every possible way. She was an African American mathematician who started at NASA (then NACA) in 1953, during segregation. She was assigned to the “colored computers,” a group of Black women performing complex calculations by hand. Critical calculations for flight trajectories and space missions, done by women who were segregated, underpaid, and rarely acknowledged.

Katherine’s work was so accurate that John Glenn specifically requested she verify the computer calculations for his orbital flight. “Get the girl to check the numbers,” he said. If Katherine said they were good, he’d fly. Her calculations were essential to Mercury, Apollo, and the Space Shuttle. She didn’t get widespread recognition until the movie Hidden Figures in 2016, when she was 98. She finally received the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Better late than never, but the delay is infuriating.

Then there’s Margaret Hamilton, who led the software team for Apollo. That code had to work perfectly because there was no patching bugs once astronauts left Earth. The stakes were life and death. Margaret pioneered software engineering as a discipline. She insisted that writing code deserved the same respect as any other engineering work. There’s this famous photo of her standing next to a stack of printouts taller than she is, all the code she and her team wrote for Apollo. During the Apollo 11 landing, when the computer started throwing alarms minutes before touchdown, Margaret’s code prioritized essential tasks and kept running. Neil Armstrong landed safely. Without her work, that moon landing probably doesn’t happen. She got a Lego figure in 2017. Great, but again, recognition came decades late.

From NASA to Silicon Valley: Modern Trailblazers

Moving into recent history, the pattern continues. Susan Wojcicki became Google’s 16th employee in 1999. She literally rented her garage to Larry Page and Sergey Brin. She went on to build AdSense and Google Analytics, then became YouTube’s CEO in 2014. Under her leadership, YouTube became one of the most influential platforms on the internet. She stepped down in 2023 and passed away in 2024 from lung cancer at 56. I never met her, but everyone I know who worked with her said she was brilliant and kind.

Sheryl Sandberg joined Facebook as COO in 2008 when they were still figuring out monetization. She transformed it into a profitable business, growing revenue from $153 million to over $39 billion during her tenure. Her book “Lean In” started important conversations about women in leadership, even if people disagreed with some conclusions. She stepped down in 2022. Ginni Rometty became IBM’s first female CEO in 2012, leading their shift into cloud computing and AI.

Here’s the depressing part. As these high profile women stepped away, they were mostly replaced by men. None of the Big Five tech companies has ever had a woman CEO. Women make up about 28% of tech workers but only 8% to 9% of senior leaders like CTOs. For every 100 men promoted to manager, only 87 women get promoted, and only 82 women of color. The math doesn’t work. Women can’t catch up at those rates.

This isn’t ancient history. This is now. And we’re still having conversations about whether women are “technical enough” or can handle leadership. From where I sit, working with security teams across Europe, I see talented women every day who are more than technical enough. The question isn’t capability. It’s opportunity and bias.

When women have actual support, they excel. Organizations like Girls Who Code, founded by Reshma Saujani, teach young women programming and show them tech careers are possible. Women Who Code provides community and mentorship. These efforts matter because representation matters. Young women need to see women in technical roles to envision themselves there. I didn’t have many role models when I started in security. I want the next generation to have more options than I did.

Research shows diverse teams make better decisions, create more innovative products, and generate higher revenue. This isn’t about fairness, though that would be reason enough. It’s about building better technology. When your team includes people from different backgrounds, they catch problems others miss, design for wider audiences, and ask different questions. The tech industry benefits enormously from women at every level.

So why aren’t these women household names? Why do we celebrate male founders who built on women’s work while those women remain footnotes? Historical bias plays a part. Women’s contributions were minimized at the time, and that erasure compounds across generations. But ongoing bias matters too. Women in tech still face skepticism and barriers men don’t encounter at the same rates. I’ve experienced it. Most women in tech have stories.

Here’s what gives me hope, though. Every time I mention Ada Lovelace or Grace Hopper or Katherine Johnson in a training session, people lean forward. They’re hungry for these stories. Young women especially need to know they’re not pioneers in an unwelcoming field. They’re continuing a tradition from the very beginning of computing. Women built this industry. Women belong here. That’s not controversial. It’s historical fact.

Last week I was running a phishing simulation workshop in Berlin, and afterward a young woman asked me how I got into cybersecurity. I told her about stumbling into it, about the challenges, about the amazing work. Then I told her about Grace Hopper and Margaret Hamilton. Her face lit up. “I didn’t know,” she said. That’s the problem. Too many people don’t know.

The tech industry has a long way to go. But knowing where we came from helps us understand where we need to go. Ada saw computers as more than calculators. Grace made programming accessible. Katherine’s calculations put people in space. Margaret’s code landed them on the moon. These women didn’t just participate. They made it possible. Remember their names. Share their stories. And if you’re hiring or building teams, remember that women have always been essential to technology. The future needs women just as much as the past depended on them. For anyone pursuing cybersecurity certifications or building a career in tech, understanding this history isn’t optional. It reminds us that excellence has never been about gender, just opportunity.

 

Information Security Awareness Training: Building Your Human Firewall

I’ve been running simulated phishing campaigns and security awareness training for businesses of all sizes for years now. Want to know what I’ve learned? Your employees are either your strongest defense or your weakest link. There’s no middle ground. And it has nothing to do with how smart they are or how much tech experience they have. It comes down to whether they’ve had proper information security awareness training.

Here’s the reality: 95% of cybersecurity incidents come down to human error. That’s not a technology problem. That’s a training problem. And it’s something we can actually fix.

What Information Security Awareness Training Actually Is

Information security awareness training isn’t a boring annual PowerPoint that employees click through while checking their email. Real security awareness training is an ongoing program that teaches your people how to recognize threats, understand their role in protecting company data, and respond correctly when something looks off.

The goal isn’t to turn every employee into a security expert. The goal is to build a workforce that understands basic security principles, can spot common attack patterns, and knows what to do when they encounter something questionable. Think of it as building a human firewall around your most valuable business assets.

When I run phishing simulations for new clients, initial click rates usually hover around 30 to 40%. After implementing structured awareness training, we typically see those numbers drop below 5% within six months. That’s not magic. That’s what happens when people know what they’re looking for.

Why Security Awareness Training Matters More Than Ever

Let’s talk numbers. The average data breach costs companies around $3.86 million. Phishing attacks account for roughly 36% of all breaches. And here’s the thing: research shows that 74% of breaches involve human error, whether it’s clicking a malicious link, using weak passwords, or falling for social engineering.

You can have the most sophisticated firewall, the best intrusion detection system, and top tier endpoint protection. But if someone in accounting clicks on a link in a fake invoice email, none of that technical security matters. That one click can bypass every control you’ve put in place.

The Evolving Threat Landscape

Attack methods keep getting more sophisticated. Phishing emails that used to have obvious spelling errors and formatting problems now look nearly identical to legitimate communications. Social engineering tactics have evolved to target specific individuals with personalized attacks based on information scraped from social media and data breaches.

Ransomware attacks don’t just encrypt files anymore. They steal data first, then threaten to publish it if you don’t pay. Business email compromise scams target finance teams with requests that appear to come from executives. And every one of these attacks starts with a human making a decision: click or don’t click, trust or verify, respond or report.

Compliance and Regulatory Requirements

Beyond the immediate security benefits, security awareness training often satisfies regulatory requirements. Frameworks like HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, ISO/IEC 27001, and NIST 800-53 all include provisions for security awareness education. Many cyber insurance policies now require documented security training programs, and some insurers offer premium reductions for organizations with strong training initiatives.

I’ve worked with clients who faced compliance audits and had to scramble to implement training programs. It’s much easier and less expensive to build security awareness into your culture from the beginning than to bolt it on later when auditors show up.

Core Components of Effective Security Awareness Training

Not all security awareness programs deliver the same results. The difference between effective training and checkbox training comes down to how well you address these core components.

Phishing Recognition and Prevention

Phishing remains the most common initial attack vector, so this should be a cornerstone of your training program. Employees need to learn how to identify suspicious emails, recognize social engineering tactics, and understand when to be skeptical of urgent requests or unusual communications.

Effective phishing training goes beyond just telling people to “be careful.” It includes simulated phishing exercises that give employees safe, real world practice identifying threats. When someone clicks on a simulated phishing email, they get immediate feedback and focused training on what they missed. This hands on approach is significantly more effective than passive learning.

Research consistently shows that organizations running regular phishing simulations see dramatic reductions in click rates. Some studies report up to 70% fewer successful phishing attacks after implementing simulation based training programs. The key is consistency. Running one phishing test per year doesn’t cut it. Monthly or quarterly simulations keep security top of mind.

Password Security and Authentication

Stolen or weak passwords continue to be a leading cause of security breaches. Your training program needs to cover password best practices: creating strong, unique passwords for each account, understanding why password reuse is dangerous, and properly using password managers.

Multi-factor authentication deserves special attention in training. Many users find MFA annoying, so they need to understand why it’s critical. I always explain it this way: if someone steals your password from a data breach, MFA is the only thing standing between them and your account. That context helps people see MFA as protection rather than inconvenience.

As passwordless authentication methods gain traction, training programs should also introduce these concepts and help employees understand how biometric authentication and hardware security keys work.

Data Protection and Privacy

Employees handle sensitive data every day, often without realizing it. Training needs to cover data classification, proper handling of confidential information, secure file sharing practices, and the risks of using personal devices or unsecured networks for work activities.

This section should address practical scenarios: Can you email customer data to yourself for remote work? Should you discuss project details on your personal phone? Is it okay to use public WiFi without a VPN? These everyday situations need clear guidance, not vague policies.

Social Engineering Awareness

Social engineering extends far beyond email phishing. Attackers use phone calls (vishing), text messages (smishing), physical pretexting, and even in-person manipulation to extract information or gain access to systems.

Training should include scenarios like someone calling from “IT support” asking for passwords, unexpected visitors claiming to be contractors, or text messages with urgent requests that create pressure to act quickly. The common thread in all social engineering is creating urgency and exploiting trust. When employees understand these psychological tactics, they become much harder to fool.

Incident Reporting Procedures

Even the best trained employees will occasionally encounter security incidents. What matters is how quickly they report them. Your training program needs to make reporting easy, clear, and safe.

Employees should know exactly who to contact when they spot something suspicious, what information to provide, and what steps to take immediately (like not clicking further links or disconnecting from the network). They also need to trust that reporting a potential incident won’t get them in trouble, even if they made a mistake.

Creating a No Blame Culture: One of my most successful client transformations involved shifting from a punitive approach to a learning approach. When employees stopped fearing punishment for reporting suspicious emails, incident reporting increased by 300%. Early detection prevented several potential breaches. Make reporting feel safe, and you’ll catch threats before they escalate.

Best Practices for Security Awareness Training Programs

Building an effective security awareness program requires more than just good content. The delivery, timing, and cultural integration all matter just as much as the material itself.

Make Training Ongoing, Not Annual

Annual security training doesn’t work. People forget. Threats evolve. What you learned 11 months ago isn’t top of mind when you receive a suspicious email on a busy Tuesday afternoon.

Effective programs use continuous education with shorter, more frequent training sessions. Monthly microlearning modules of 5 to 10 minutes are far more effective than a single hour long session once per year. Regular phishing simulations keep people engaged and vigilant. Quarterly focused training on specific topics allows deeper dives without overwhelming employees.

Use Real World Examples and Scenarios

Generic training about theoretical threats doesn’t resonate. People need to see how attacks actually work and how they target organizations like yours. When possible, use examples from recent breaches in your industry. Show actual phishing emails that targeted similar companies. For more detailed guidance on implementing effective training programs, check out our guide on how to conduct effective cybersecurity awareness training.

I always incorporate case studies from well known incidents when training. When employees see that major companies with sophisticated security teams still fall victim to these attacks, they understand that anyone can be targeted and that vigilance matters at every level.

Incorporate Gamification and Interactive Elements

Passive learning through videos and presentations has limited effectiveness. Interactive training that requires active participation dramatically improves retention and engagement.

Gamification elements like leaderboards, badges, and rewards can motivate employees to take training seriously. Security challenges where teams compete to spot threats or answer security questions correctly make learning fun while reinforcing key concepts. Some organizations even run “capture the flag” style exercises where employees hunt for security issues in controlled environments.

The key is making security training something people want to engage with rather than something they’re forced to complete. When employees enjoy the training, they pay attention and retain more information.

Secure Leadership Buy-In and Participation

Security culture starts at the top. When executives and managers actively participate in training, complete phishing simulations, and visibly prioritize security, the entire organization follows suit.

Leadership involvement also means allocating adequate budget and time for training. Security awareness can’t be something squeezed into spare moments. It needs dedicated resources and organizational support. When leadership treats security training as a priority rather than an obligation, employees recognize its importance.

Tailor Training to Different Roles and Risk Levels

Everyone needs baseline security awareness, but different roles face different threats and require different depth of training. Your finance team needs extra training on business email compromise and wire fraud. IT staff need deeper technical training on secure configuration and patch management. Executives are high value targets who need specific training on whaling attacks and social engineering tactics aimed at leadership.

New employees represent particularly high risk during their first three months. They’re learning systems, building relationships, and trying to be helpful, which makes them vulnerable to social engineering. Dedicated onboarding security training can reduce incident risk in new hires by up to 30%.

Measure, Track, and Improve

You can’t improve what you don’t measure. Effective security awareness programs track key metrics like phishing simulation click rates, training completion rates, time to report suspicious emails, and actual security incidents attributed to human error.

Baseline assessments before training begins give you a starting point for comparison. Regular assessments throughout the program show progress and identify areas where additional training is needed. Some organizations see 20 to 40% improvements in security awareness metrics after implementing structured training programs.

Share these metrics with stakeholders and leadership. When you can demonstrate measurable improvements in security posture, it’s much easier to secure continued funding and support for training initiatives.

Best Practice Why It Matters Expected Impact
Ongoing microlearning Maintains awareness and adapts to new threats Better retention and lower incident rates
Regular phishing simulations Provides safe practice with immediate feedback Up to 70% reduction in successful phishing
Role-based training Addresses specific risks for different positions More relevant and effective training
No blame culture Encourages reporting without fear Earlier threat detection and response
Leadership participation Sets organizational tone and priority Higher engagement across all levels
Metrics tracking Demonstrates value and identifies gaps Continuous improvement and ROI evidence

Table 1: Security Awareness Training Best Practices and Their Impact

Common Challenges and How to Overcome Them

Even with the best intentions, security awareness programs face obstacles. Here’s how to navigate the most common challenges.

Employee Fatigue and Disengagement

Security training often competes with everything else demanding employees’ attention. Long, boring training modules get ignored or clicked through without real engagement.

The solution is making training interesting, relevant, and respectful of people’s time. Short modules work better than long ones. Interactive content beats passive videos. Humor and storytelling make concepts memorable. And timing matters. Delivering training during less busy periods increases completion rates and engagement.

Balancing Security with Productivity

Some employees view security measures as obstacles to getting work done. Multi-factor authentication adds steps. Password requirements feel burdensome. Reporting suspicious emails takes time.

Training needs to frame security not as barriers but as enablers. When employees understand that security measures protect their work, their personal information, and the company’s ability to operate, they’re more likely to embrace them. Showing the real consequences of breaches, including lost productivity during incident response, helps people understand that security and productivity aren’t competing priorities.

Keeping Content Current

Cyber threats evolve constantly. Training content from even two years ago may miss important new attack vectors or current threat trends. Maintaining fresh, relevant content requires ongoing effort and resources.

Many organizations solve this by using security awareness platforms that automatically update content or by working with training providers who handle content refresh. Alternatively, supplement formal training with regular security bulletins or brief updates about current threats relevant to your industry.

Building Your Security Awareness Training Program

Starting a security awareness program from scratch can feel overwhelming. Here’s a practical roadmap based on what I’ve seen work across different organizations.

Step 1: Assess Your Current State

Before designing training, understand where you are now. Run a baseline phishing simulation to see your current vulnerability. Survey employees about their security knowledge. Review past security incidents to identify patterns. This baseline gives you starting metrics and helps identify your biggest gaps.

Step 2: Define Your Training Objectives

What specific outcomes do you want? Reduce phishing click rates by a certain percentage? Achieve compliance with specific regulations? Decrease security incidents? Clear objectives help you design focused training and measure success.

Step 3: Choose Your Delivery Method

Decide whether to build training in house, use a security awareness platform, work with external trainers, or combine approaches. Each option has tradeoffs in cost, customization, and maintenance requirements. Many organizations find that platforms like Infosec IQ or similar solutions provide good balance between customization and managed content updates.

Step 4: Start with Core Topics

Begin with the fundamentals that address your biggest risks. For most organizations, that means phishing, password security, and basic data protection. Get these core areas solid before expanding to more specialized topics.

Step 5: Implement Regular Reinforcement

Schedule ongoing training activities. Monthly phishing simulations, quarterly focused training modules, and regular security tips through email or your internal communications channels keep security visible and top of mind.

Step 6: Measure and Adapt

Track your metrics consistently. Review what’s working and what isn’t. Adjust content, timing, or delivery based on your results and employee feedback. Security awareness programs should evolve as your organization and the threat landscape change.

Starting small and building momentum works better than trying to launch a comprehensive program all at once. I’ve seen organizations successfully begin with just monthly phishing simulations and a single security topic per quarter, then gradually expand as they build momentum and demonstrate value.

The Connection Between Security Awareness and Professional Certifications

While security awareness training targets all employees, security professionals benefit from formal education that goes much deeper. Certifications like CompTIA Security+ provide foundational knowledge about security principles, while more advanced credentials like CISM or CISSP prepare security leaders to build and manage comprehensive security programs, including awareness initiatives.

If you’re responsible for building or improving your organization’s security awareness program, investing in your own professional development strengthens your ability to design effective training. Understanding security at a deeper technical and strategic level helps you create training that addresses real risks rather than checking compliance boxes.

Building Security from the Ground Up

Your employees are either your weakest link or your strongest defense. Security awareness training determines which. The organizations that get this right don’t view training as compliance theater. They see it as an essential investment in their security posture and build programs that respect employees’ time while genuinely preparing them to recognize and respond to threats. Start where you are, measure your progress, and keep improving. Your human firewall gets stronger with every training cycle.

 

The Linux Security Commands You Actually Need to Know

 

The terminal still intimidates people, and I get it. That black screen with white text doesn’t give you much feedback, and one wrong command can mess things up. I’ve seen experienced IT professionals who can troubleshoot network issues in their sleep get nervous when they need to navigate Linux from the command line.

Here’s what I tell people: you don’t need to become a Linux expert overnight. You just need to know the commands that matter for security. The same dozen or so commands will handle most of what you actually need to do. If you’re working in IT, you’re going to run into Linux. It’s everywhere. Cloud servers, containers, networking equipment, IoT devices. And whether you’re managing your first server or supporting enterprise infrastructure, understanding basic Linux security commands isn’t optional anymore. It’s part of the job.

Here’s something nobody tells beginners: you don’t need to memorize hundreds of Linux commands. Even experienced administrators keep a cheat sheet handy. What you do need is a solid understanding of the commands that keep your system secure, because whether you’re managing a home server, working toward your first IT job, or maintaining enterprise infrastructure, these commands are your first line of defense. Linux powers everything from Android phones to the world’s largest supercomputers. It runs the majority of web servers, cloud infrastructure, and embedded systems. According to the Linux Foundation, Linux dominates over 90% of public cloud workloads. That means if you’re working in IT, you’re going to encounter Linux. And when you do, knowing basic security commands separates the people who can actually solve problems from the ones who panic and escalate everything.

Think of Linux security commands like knowing how to check your car’s oil, tire pressure, and brake fluid. You might not be a mechanic, but these basic checks keep you from getting stranded. Same principle applies here.

Understanding the Terminal and User Management

That terminal window looks complicated, but underneath all that, you’re just typing instructions that the computer follows. No different than using any other interface, except instead of clicking buttons, you’re typing commands. The dollar sign or hash at the start of your terminal line is the prompt. Dollar sign means you’re a regular user. Hash means you’re root, the superuser with complete system access. If you see the hash and didn’t intentionally become root, stop and figure out why. Root is like having the master key to every door in a building. Powerful, yes. Something you should use constantly? No. You run most commands as a regular user and only elevate to root when necessary using sudo.

Most Linux commands follow a simple pattern: command, options, arguments. For example, ls lists files, ls -la lists all files with details, and ls -la /home lists all files with details in the home directory. Options usually start with a dash. Every command comes with a manual. Type man followed by any command name to see its documentation. They’re often dry, but they’re comprehensive and always available, even without internet.

The sudo command lets you run commands with administrative privileges without logging in as root. This is important for security because it means you only elevate your privileges when necessary, and everything you do with sudo gets logged. Think of it as checking out the master key from security, using it, then returning it immediately. Basic usage: sudo [command]. For example, sudo apt update runs the package update command with root privileges. You’ll be prompted for your password. If you’re in the sudoers file, the command executes. If not, you get denied and the attempt gets logged. If you need to run multiple commands as root, use sudo su to become root temporarily rather than typing sudo before every command. Just remember to type exit when you’re done. I’ve seen people forget they’re running as root and accidentally break their entire system.

The whoami command returns your current username. Simple, but useful when you’re switching between users or working on multiple systems. The id command gives you more detail: your user ID, group ID, and all groups you belong to. This matters because Linux permissions are based on user IDs and groups. When you’re troubleshooting why you can’t access a file, id tells you exactly what permissions you have. The passwd command changes passwords. Run it without arguments to change your own password. Run sudo passwd username to change someone else’s password if you have the privileges. The system will prompt you for the new password twice to confirm. Here’s what catches beginners: Linux doesn’t show any characters when you type a password. No asterisks, no dots, nothing. You’re typing, the system is recording it, but you get zero visual feedback. That’s just how it works. Type your password, hit enter, trust the process.

File Permissions and Ownership

Linux file permissions are straightforward. Every file and directory has three sets of permissions: one for the owner, one for the group, and one for everyone else. Each set can include read, write, and execute permissions. Understanding these is fundamental to Linux security. The Center for Internet Security identifies proper file permissions as one of the critical security controls for any Linux system. Before you can change permissions, you need to see what they are. The command ls -l lists files in long format, showing all the permission details. You’ll see something like: -rw-r–r– 1 mike users 2048 Jan 15 10:30 important_file.txt

That first group of letters shows permissions. The first character indicates file type. A dash means regular file, d means directory. The next nine characters are permissions in groups of three: owner, group, and others. Each group shows read, write, and execute permissions. A dash means that permission is not granted. Read permission lets you view file content. Write permission lets you modify or delete the file. Execute permission lets you run the file as a program. For directories, read lets you list contents, write lets you create or delete files inside, and execute lets you access the directory.

Permission Symbol Numeric Value What It Means
Read r 4 Can view the file content
Write w 2 Can modify or delete the file
Execute x 1 Can run the file as a program
No Permission 0 Cannot access in this way

Table 1: Linux Permission Values

The chmod command modifies file permissions. You can use symbolic notation with letters or numeric notation with numbers. Both work, and most admins use whichever one they remember in the moment. Symbolic method: chmod u+x filename adds execute permission for the user. The u means user, the plus sign means add, and x means execute. You can also use g for group, o for others, and a for all. Use minus to remove permissions. Numeric method: chmod 755 filename sets permissions using numbers. Add up the values for each permission type, and you get a number for each group. So 755 means owner gets read, write, and execute. Group and others get read and execute. Common permissions are 644 for regular files and 755 for executables and directories. chmod 777 gives full permissions to everyone and is almost always wrong. Yes, it will fix your permission problem. It will also give every user and every process complete access to that file. Use 777 on a production system and you’re asking for trouble.

The chown command changes who owns a file or directory. You’ll need sudo for this because regular users can’t just give away ownership. Basic syntax: sudo chown username filename. You can change both owner and group at once: sudo chown username:groupname filename. The colon separates the user from the group. This is useful when setting up web servers or shared directories where specific users and groups need specific access. The recursive flag changes ownership of a directory and everything inside: sudo chown -R username:groupname /path/to/directory. Be careful with this. Recursively changing ownership of the wrong directory creates a mess.

Managing Processes and Network Connections

Understanding what’s running on your system is critical for security. Malware runs quietly in the background. These commands help you see what’s actually happening right now. The ps command shows running processes. By itself, it only shows processes in your current terminal session. But ps aux shows every process on the system with detailed information about who’s running it and resource usage. When you run ps aux, you’ll see columns for user, process ID, CPU usage, memory usage, and the command. This is your first stop when something seems wrong. High CPU usage? Check ps aux. Mystery process eating memory? Check ps aux.

The top command gives you a live view of system processes. You’ll see processes sorted by CPU usage, updating every few seconds. Press q to quit. The htop command is more user friendly. It’s not always installed by default, but worth adding. Htop gives you the same information with a better interface, color coding, and easier process management. The kill command sends signals to processes. The default signal politely asks the process to shut down. Most programs will clean up and exit when they receive this signal. If a process refuses to stop, use kill -9 followed by the process ID. This immediately terminates the process. The process doesn’t get to save its work or clean up. Use this when necessary, but try the polite approach first. The killall command stops all processes with a specific name. For example, killall firefox closes all Firefox processes. This is convenient but potentially dangerous. Make sure you’re killing what you think you’re killing.

Your network connections carry both legitimate traffic and potential attacks. These commands help you see what’s connecting to your system and what ports are open. The netstat command shows network connections, routing tables, and statistics. The most useful variation is netstat -tulpn. The flags show TCP connections, UDP connections, listening ports, the program using each port, and numerical addresses. When you run this, you’ll see what ports your system is listening on and what’s actively connected. If you see a port open that shouldn’t be, or a connection to an unknown IP address, investigate. The ss command is replacing netstat on newer systems because it’s faster and more detailed. The syntax is similar: ss -tulpn gives you the same information. Some distributions are deprecating netstat, so learn ss even if you’re comfortable with netstat. On systems with thousands of connections, netstat can be slow. The ss command uses more efficient methods and returns results almost instantly.

Iptables is Linux’s built in firewall. It’s powerful and complex. What you need to know: iptables controls what network traffic is allowed in and out by matching packets against rules. To view current rules: sudo iptables -L -v. If you see many ACCEPT rules and no DROP or REJECT rules, your firewall is essentially wide open. For beginners, use ufw instead. Ufw makes firewall management straightforward. Enable it with sudo ufw enable. Allow specific services with sudo ufw allow ssh or sudo ufw allow 80/tcp. Check status with sudo ufw status. You’ve got a working firewall without complexity. I worked with a client who disabled their firewall temporarily to troubleshoot. They forgot to turn it back on. Three days later, their server was compromised. Firewall stays on. If something doesn’t work with the firewall enabled, fix the rules. Don’t disable the firewall.

Reading Logs and Tracking Activity

Logs tell you what happened, when it happened, and often who did it. Learning to read logs is critical for troubleshooting and security. According to NIST’s Guide to Computer Security Log Management, effective log monitoring and analysis is one of the most important defensive measures for detecting security incidents early. Log files live in /var/log/ on most systems. The tail command shows the last few lines of a file. Running tail -f /var/log/syslog follows the log in real time, showing new entries as they’re written. Useful when testing something and wanting immediate feedback. The less command lets you scroll through a file. Use less to read logs at your own pace. Press slash to search, n to go to the next match, and q to quit.

The grep command searches for patterns in files. Basic usage: grep “search term” filename. For example, grep “failed” /var/log/auth.log shows all lines containing “failed,” which usually means someone tried and failed to log in. Make grep case insensitive with -i, show line numbers with -n, and search directories with -r. For finding security issues: sudo grep -i “failed\|error\|unauthorized” /var/log/auth.log. This searches for any of those terms and highlights potential problems. You can pipe commands together. For example, ps aux | grep apache shows only processes with apache in their name. This filters large outputs down to what matters.

The last command shows successful logins. Run it to see who logged in, from where, when, and for how long. Essential for security audits. If you see logins you don’t recognize, from strange locations, or at odd times, you may have found unauthorized access. The lastb command shows failed login attempts and requires sudo. A few failed attempts might be someone forgetting their password. Hundreds from an unknown IP address? That’s an attack. Time to block that IP. These login history commands are your security time machine. They show you exactly who’s been accessing your system and who’s been trying to get in. Check them regularly, especially on any system exposed to the internet.

Putting It Into Practice

You now have the essential Linux security commands. But knowing commands is just the start. Real skill comes from understanding when to use them, what to look for, and how to interpret results. That takes practice. Set up a virtual machine or cloud instance to practice. Break things on purpose. See what happens when you chmod the wrong directory. Watch what logs appear when you SSH with the wrong password. The more you experiment safely, the better you’ll be when it matters.

If you’re building an IT career, understanding Linux is essential. Certifications like CompTIA A+ and CompTIA Linux+ can validate your knowledge. But more than any certification, hands on experience with these commands makes you valuable to employers. Start checking your systems regularly. Look at running processes. Review your firewall rules. Check login attempts. Search your logs for errors. Make it a habit. The people who succeed with Linux aren’t the ones who memorize man pages. They’re the ones who get comfortable using these tools every day until it becomes second nature.

Final Thoughts

Linux security doesn’t have to be intimidating. Start with these essential commands, practice regularly, and the terminal will become familiar territory instead of something to avoid. The command line is just a tool. And now you know how to use it to keep your systems secure.

 

ISACA’s New AAISM Certification: Your Roadmap to AI Security Management

 

Let me be straight with you. When ISACA launched the Advanced in AI Security Management (AAISM) certification in early 2025, it wasn’t just another credential to add to the pile. This is the first and only certification specifically designed for security managers who need to handle AI-specific threats and opportunities. And if you’re a CISM or CISSP holder wondering whether this is worth your time, I’m going to break down exactly what this certification means for your career.

I’ve spent years helping organizations figure out which certifications actually move the needle for their teams and which ones just look good on paper. The AAISM falls firmly into the first category. Here’s why it matters and whether it’s the right next step for you.

Why ISACA Created the AAISM Certification

The numbers tell a clear story. According to ISACA’s latest AI Pulse Poll, 95% of digital trust professionals are worried that generative AI will be exploited by bad actors. That’s not paranoia, that’s reality. AI is being adopted faster than organizations can create policies to govern it. Only 15% of companies have established clear guidelines for AI use, which means most security managers are flying blind.

The problem isn’t that security professionals lack skills. It’s that traditional security training never addressed AI-specific challenges. Your CISM prepared you to manage information security programs. Your CISSP gave you deep technical security knowledge. But neither one covered how to assess risks in machine learning models, govern AI development lifecycles, or protect against adversarial attacks on AI systems. Research from Gartner shows that AI security and governance are among the top technology trends organizations are prioritizing, yet most lack qualified personnel to address these challenges.

ISACA saw this gap and built the AAISM to fill it. This isn’t a foundational certification. It’s an advanced credential that assumes you already know security management inside and out. What it adds is the specialized knowledge to handle AI-specific security challenges that are becoming critical in nearly every organization.

Think of AAISM as the difference between knowing how to manage a traditional data center and knowing how to manage a cloud environment. The fundamentals are the same, but the specific technologies, risks, and controls are different enough that you need specialized knowledge to do it right.

Who Should Pursue the AAISM Certification

Let me save you some time. AAISM isn’t for everyone, and that’s by design. ISACA made the prerequisites clear: you must hold an active CISM or CISSP certification. No exceptions. This is an advanced credential built on top of existing security management expertise.

You’re a Strong Candidate If You:

Work as a security manager, CISO, or similar role where you’re responsible for implementing security strategy across your organization. Your company is actively deploying AI solutions or considering AI adoption, and leadership expects you to manage the security implications. You already hold a CISM or CISSP and want to differentiate yourself in a competitive job market.

You’re involved in AI governance discussions, risk assessments, or policy development around AI usage. You need to speak credibly about AI security to executive stakeholders who are pushing for AI adoption. You work in regulated industries where AI implementation requires documented security controls and compliance evidence.

AAISM Probably Isn’t Right for You If:

You don’t hold a CISM or CISSP yet. Start there first. Those foundational certifications are prerequisites for a reason. You’re new to security management and still building your core skills. Get a few years of experience under your belt before tackling advanced certifications.

Your organization isn’t working with AI and has no plans to. Save your time and money for certifications that align with your actual job responsibilities. You’re looking for an audit-focused AI credential. ISACA’s other new certification, the Advanced in AI Audit (AAIA), is designed specifically for auditors who hold CISA or similar credentials.

Real Talk from the Field: I work with enterprise clients every week who are scrambling to figure out their AI security strategy. The ones who succeed have security leaders who can speak the language of both traditional security and AI-specific risks. AAISM gives you that vocabulary and framework. The ones who struggle are trying to apply old security models to new AI challenges, and it doesn’t work.

What the AAISM Certification Covers

The AAISM exam tests your knowledge across three distinct domains. These aren’t theoretical concepts pulled from academic papers. They’re based on the real-world practices that security managers need to implement AI safely in enterprise environments.

Domain 1: AI Governance and Program Management

This domain focuses on the strategic and operational aspects of managing AI security at the organizational level. You’ll need to demonstrate your ability to advise stakeholders on AI security solutions, establish appropriate policies, manage data governance, and handle AI-related incidents.

The key areas include stakeholder considerations and regulatory requirements, developing AI-specific security policies and procedures, managing the AI asset and data lifecycle, building and maintaining AI security programs, and establishing business continuity and incident response processes tailored to AI.

This is where your existing CISM or CISSP knowledge gets enhanced with AI-specific governance considerations. You’re expected to know how to collaborate on charters and define roles for AI governance that align with business objectives while ensuring responsible AI use through ethical principles and regulatory compliance.

Domain 2: AI Risk Management

This domain confirms your skill at assessing and managing the unique risks, threats, and vulnerabilities that come with enterprise AI adoption. This includes supply chain considerations, which are critical since many organizations rely on third-party AI solutions.

You’ll need expertise in AI risk assessment methodologies and treatment strategies, managing threats and vulnerabilities specific to AI systems (including generative AI risks), and overseeing vendor relationships and supply chain issues related to AI solutions.

The exam will test your ability to conduct AI impact assessments, design testing and vulnerability management specifically for AI solutions, and embed security requirements when working with vendor AI-enabled products. According to NIST’s AI Risk Management Framework, which AAISM aligns with, understanding these unique risk factors is essential for responsible AI deployment.

Domain 3: AI Technologies and Controls

This domain dives into the technical side. You need to understand AI security architecture, implement appropriate controls, manage data throughout the AI lifecycle, and address privacy and ethical considerations.

The specific competencies include designing security architecture specifically for AI systems, integrating AI architecture into broader enterprise architecture, implementing and reviewing AI security controls to manage risk, establishing processes to identify and classify AI-related data and assets, treating security risks throughout the AI lifecycle, and maintaining monitoring and incident handling processes for AI-specific security events.

This is where technical depth matters. You’re expected to understand the security implications of different AI technologies, from traditional machine learning to generative AI, and know how to implement controls that actually work in these environments.

Domain Focus Area Key Competencies
1. AI Governance and Program Management Strategic oversight and policy Stakeholder engagement, policy development, data governance, program management, incident response
2. AI Risk Management Identifying and treating AI risks Risk assessment, threat management, vulnerability handling, supply chain security
3. AI Technologies and Controls Technical implementation Security architecture, data controls, privacy measures, ethical considerations, monitoring

Table 1: AAISM Exam Domain Breakdown

AAISM Exam Details and Requirements

Let’s talk logistics. The AAISM exam consists of 90 multiple-choice questions. You get 2.5 hours to complete it, which works out to about 1 minute and 40 seconds per question. The passing score is 450 out of 900 points, which uses ISACA’s scaled scoring system (similar to what you experienced with CISM or CISSP).

The exam is computer-based and administered either at authorized PSI testing centers globally or through remote proctoring. However, there’s an important restriction: candidates in India, Mainland China, and Hong Kong can only take the exam at physical testing centers. Remote proctoring isn’t available in those regions.

Registration and Eligibility

When you register for the AAISM exam, you get a 12-month eligibility period. That means you have one year from your registration date to actually sit for the exam. You can’t schedule your exam appointment more than 90 days in advance, so plan accordingly.

The exam registration must be paid in full before you can schedule your testing appointment. ISACA maintains a zero-tolerance policy for fraudulent test-taking activities, so make sure you’re following all their guidelines.

One nice feature: you can reschedule your exam anytime during your eligibility period without penalty, as long as you do it at least 48 hours before your scheduled appointment. This gives you flexibility if your schedule changes or you need more study time.

Maintaining Your AAISM Certification

Once you pass the exam and earn your AAISM, you’ll need to maintain it through continuing professional education. ISACA requires 10 CPE hours annually related to AI topics to keep your certification active. This is in addition to any CPE requirements for your CISM or CISSP.

The CPE requirement ensures you stay current with rapidly evolving AI security practices. Given how fast the AI landscape is changing, this ongoing education isn’t just a checkbox, it’s actually valuable for keeping your skills relevant.

Here’s something I tell every client: don’t register for the exam until you’re actually ready to start serious preparation. That 12-month eligibility window sounds generous, but it goes faster than you think, especially if you’re balancing exam prep with a full-time job. Pick your registration timing strategically.

How AAISM Fits with Other ISACA Certifications

If you’re familiar with ISACA’s certification portfolio, you might be wondering how AAISM relates to other credentials. Let me break down the ecosystem so you can see where this fits in your certification roadmap.

AAISM vs. AAIA

ISACA launched two AI-focused advanced certifications at the same time: AAISM for security managers and AAIA (Advanced in AI Audit) for auditors. The distinction is clear. AAISM is for people who implement and manage AI security controls. AAIA is for people who audit those controls.

If you hold a CISA and work in audit, AAIA is your path. If you hold a CISM or CISSP and work in security management, AAISM is yours. Some professionals will eventually earn both, but most people should focus on the one that matches their current role.

The ISACA AI Certification Pathway

ISACA offers a progression of AI-related training and certifications. At the foundation level, they have AI Fundamentals and various AI training courses that anyone can take. These give you a broad understanding of the AI ecosystem and basic concepts.

The advanced certifications, AAISM and AAIA, sit at the top of this pathway. They’re designed for experienced professionals who already have strong foundational knowledge in security or audit and want to specialize in AI-specific applications of their expertise.

This tiered approach makes sense. You don’t jump straight into advanced AI security management without first understanding general security management. Similarly, ISACA doesn’t expect you to tackle AAISM without the experience that comes with earning a CISM or CISSP first.

Career Impact and ROI

Let’s talk about what really matters: will this certification help your career and is it worth the investment? I’m going to give you the honest answer based on what I’m seeing in the market.

Current Market Demand

Organizations are desperate for security leaders who understand AI. Not people who can vaguely talk about AI risks, but professionals who can actually build governance frameworks, assess specific AI technologies, and implement effective controls. The gap between demand and qualified supply is significant right now.

Companies are making decisions about AI adoption every single day. They’re deploying AI tools, building AI-powered products, and integrating AI into their operations. Most of them don’t have clear AI security policies or anyone on staff who really knows how to manage AI-specific risks. That’s the opportunity.

Having AAISM on your resume signals to employers that you’re not just claiming you can handle AI security, you’ve actually proven it through a rigorous certification process. In a crowded job market, that differentiation matters.

Salary and Role Considerations

It’s too early to have solid salary data specifically tied to AAISM since the certification just launched. But we can look at the trend data for professionals with AI security skills compared to those without. According to industry surveys, security managers with AI expertise command salary premiums of 15 to 25% compared to peers without those skills. The (ISC)² Cybersecurity Workforce Study consistently shows that specialized certifications in emerging areas like AI security lead to faster career progression and higher compensation.

More importantly, AAISM positions you for roles that didn’t exist a few years ago. AI Security Manager, AI Governance Lead, Chief AI Security Officer. These positions are being created at major companies, and they require exactly the skillset that AAISM validates.

The certification also strengthens your position if you’re already in a security leadership role. When your CEO or board asks about the security implications of the new AI initiative, you can speak with authority and back it up with recognized credentials.

What I’m Seeing with Clients: The organizations I work with are actively looking for people with AAISM-level knowledge. They’re tired of hearing security managers say “I don’t know” when asked about AI security. They need someone who can step up, provide guidance, and actually implement solutions. That’s worth paying for.

Investment Breakdown

The exam registration fee for AAISM is similar to other ISACA advanced certifications. You’ll also want to invest in study materials, which typically include the AAISM Review Manual and practice questions. Some professionals opt for instructor-led training, which adds to the cost but significantly improves pass rates.

When you calculate ROI, don’t just think about the dollars spent on certification. Consider the opportunity cost of NOT having these skills. If your organization is deploying AI and you’re not equipped to manage the security implications, someone else will be brought in to do it. That could be a missed promotion, a lost job opportunity, or getting passed over for strategic projects.

Preparing for the AAISM Exam

Let me give you some practical guidance on exam preparation, drawing from what I’ve learned helping professionals succeed with ISACA certifications over the years.

Study Resources

ISACA provides official study materials including the AAISM Review Manual (available in print and ebook formats) and a Questions, Answers, and Explanations (QAE) database. These should be your primary study resources since they’re aligned directly with the exam content.

ISACA also offers virtual workshops that provide immersive, instructor-led training over two days. These workshops include the review manual, QAE database, and the exam fee. You’ll earn 19 CPE credits just for attending, which is a nice bonus.

Study Timeline

Most successful candidates spend 2 to 3 months preparing for the AAISM exam. This assumes you already have your CISM or CISSP and relevant work experience with AI projects. If you’re newer to AI technologies, plan for longer study time.

Don’t try to cram. This isn’t a memorization exam. You need to understand the concepts deeply enough to apply them to scenario-based questions. The exam tests your ability to make judgment calls about AI security decisions, not just recall facts.

Effective Study Strategies

Focus on Real World Application: Don’t just memorize definitions. Think about how you would apply each concept in your organization. ISACA’s questions are scenario-based, so practice thinking through problems from a management perspective.

Use the QAE Database Strategically: Don’t just read through practice questions. Review the explanations for both correct and incorrect answers. Understanding why wrong answers are wrong is as valuable as knowing the right answer.

Connect to Your CISM or CISSP Knowledge: AAISM builds on what you already know. When studying new AI security concepts, explicitly connect them to the traditional security principles you’re already familiar with.

Stay Current with AI Security News: Follow developments in AI security, new vulnerabilities, regulatory changes, and best practices. This real-world context helps you answer exam questions more intuitively.

Is AAISM Right for Your Career Path?

Here’s the bottom line. AAISM is worth pursuing if you’re a security manager or CISO who needs to address AI security in your organization. It’s particularly valuable if you work in regulated industries, support AI development teams, or need to brief executives on AI security strategy.

The certification differentiates you in a market where AI security expertise is scarce but increasingly critical. It provides a structured framework for thinking about AI-specific security challenges and validates your knowledge to employers and stakeholders.

However, it’s not worth pursuing if you don’t yet have your foundational security management certification, if your organization has no AI initiatives, or if you’re primarily focused on audit rather than implementation. In those cases, pursue your CISM or CISSP first, wait for AI adoption in your organization, or consider the AAIA certification instead.

The AI security field is evolving rapidly, and having AAISM positions you at the forefront of this evolution. Just make sure the timing aligns with your career stage and organizational needs. For more guidance on building your cybersecurity certification path, check out our articles on CISM vs CISSP: Which Certification Is Right for You? and how long it takes to earn your CISSP.

Final Thoughts

AAISM represents where cybersecurity is heading. AI isn’t a future concern anymore. It’s here, it’s being deployed rapidly, and organizations need security professionals who can manage it properly. If you’re ready to step into that role, AAISM gives you the credentials and knowledge to do it with confidence.

 

Security Awareness Training Best Practices: How to Build an Effective Program

 

As VP of Educational Services at Training Camp, I’ve spent decades designing training programs that actually work. I’ve seen what happens when organizations treat security awareness training as a checkbox exercise, and I’ve seen the transformation when they do it right. The difference isn’t just in the content, it’s in the approach.

Here’s the uncomfortable truth: your employees are either your strongest security layer or your weakest link. According to the 2024 IBM Data Breach Report, 95% of cybersecurity breaches involve human error. That’s not because your employees are careless. It’s because most security awareness training fails to change behavior.

After helping train nearly 100,000 IT professionals and working as the lead course designer for our CompTIA Security+ program, I’ve learned what separates programs that change behavior from those that just check boxes. This guide shares those lessons.

Why Most Security Awareness Training Fails

Before we talk about what works, let’s acknowledge what doesn’t. I’ve reviewed hundreds of security awareness programs, and most share the same fatal flaws.

They treat training as an annual event rather than an ongoing practice. Employees sit through a 45 minute video once a year, click through some slides, pass a quiz, and promptly forget everything. When that phishing email arrives six months later, the training is a distant memory.

They rely on fear and intimidation. Scare tactics might grab attention initially, but they don’t build the kind of security culture you need. People tune out when they feel lectured at or threatened with consequences.

They’re disconnected from real work scenarios. Generic examples about hackers in dark hoodies don’t resonate with employees who need to understand how security threats appear in their actual day to day work. The accounts payable clerk needs different training than the customer service rep.

Most importantly, they never measure behavior change. Organizations track completion rates and quiz scores but have no idea if employees actually apply what they learned when it matters.

Building a Foundation: Understanding Your Training Needs

Effective security awareness training starts with understanding your specific risks and your audience. This requires a thoughtful assessment before you design a single training module.

Conduct a Security Risk Assessment

Start by identifying your organization’s most significant security vulnerabilities. Work with your IT security team to understand where breaches are most likely to occur. Is it phishing attacks? Weak password practices? Unsecured mobile devices? Social engineering attempts?

Review your incident history. What security events have you experienced in the past? Where did the breakdowns occur? This historical data reveals patterns and helps you prioritize training topics.

Map Your Audience Segments

Not all employees face the same security risks. A financial analyst with access to sensitive financial data needs different training than a warehouse worker who uses a shared terminal.

Segment your workforce by role, access level, and risk exposure. Create training pathways that address each group’s specific needs while maintaining a core curriculum that everyone completes. This targeted approach increases relevance and improves retention.

Establish Baseline Metrics

Before you launch any training, establish baseline measurements. Run a simulated phishing campaign to see your current click rate. Survey employees about their security knowledge and confidence. Document current security incidents and near misses.

These baselines become your benchmarks for measuring improvement. Without them, you can’t demonstrate the value of your training program or identify areas that need reinforcement.

Designing Engaging Security Awareness Content

Content design makes or breaks security awareness training. The principles that make our certification boot camps effective apply equally to security awareness programs.

Make It Scenario Based and Contextual

Adults learn best when training connects directly to their work. Instead of abstract lessons about phishing, show employees what a phishing email looks like in their actual email client. Use real examples from your industry and organization.

Create decision based scenarios where employees navigate realistic situations. “You receive an email from the CEO asking you to purchase gift cards urgently. What do you do?” These interactive scenarios build critical thinking skills that transfer to real situations.

Use Microlearning for Better Retention

Research consistently shows that shorter, focused learning sessions produce better retention than lengthy training marathons. Break your security awareness curriculum into 5 to 10 minute modules that employees can complete between tasks.

Each microlearning module should focus on a single concept or skill. How to identify phishing emails. Creating strong passwords. Securing mobile devices. This focused approach helps learners absorb and retain information more effectively.

Incorporate Multiple Learning Modalities

People learn differently. Some prefer visual content, others learn better through hands-on practice, and many benefit from a combination of methods. Design your training to accommodate different learning preferences.

Mix video demonstrations with interactive simulations, infographics, written guides, and practical exercises. This variety keeps employees engaged and ensures concepts stick through multiple reinforcement channels.

Instructional Design Tip

In our Security+ boot camps, we’ve found that hands-on practice with immediate feedback creates the strongest learning outcomes. Apply this same principle to security awareness training by incorporating simulations where employees can practice identifying threats in a safe environment.

Creating a Continuous Learning Culture

The most effective security awareness programs don’t end when the training module closes. They create an ongoing culture where security becomes part of how your organization operates.

Implement Regular Reinforcement

Security awareness training should be continuous, not episodic. After initial training, implement monthly or quarterly refresher sessions that reinforce key concepts and introduce emerging threats.

Use multiple touchpoints throughout the year. Send brief security tips via email. Post infographics in common areas. Share security success stories in team meetings. This consistent exposure keeps security top of mind without overwhelming employees with lengthy training sessions.

Run Realistic Simulations

Simulated phishing campaigns are one of the most valuable tools in your security awareness toolkit. They provide real world practice in a controlled environment and reveal which employees need additional support.

Start with easier simulations and gradually increase difficulty as your organization’s security awareness improves. When employees click on a simulated phishing link, provide immediate, constructive feedback that explains what red flags they missed. This teachable moment is far more effective than punishment.

According to KnowBe4’s Phishing Benchmark Report, organizations that conduct regular simulated phishing tests see click rates drop from an average of 32% initially to under 5% after a year of consistent training and testing.

Foster a No Blame Culture

Fear of consequences prevents employees from reporting security incidents or admitting mistakes. If someone clicks on a real phishing link and doesn’t report it immediately, the damage multiplies exponentially.

Create a culture where employees feel safe reporting potential security issues without fear of punishment. Celebrate employees who catch and report suspicious emails. Acknowledge that everyone makes mistakes, and emphasize that quick reporting enables quick response.

Essential Topics for Your Security Awareness Program

While your specific curriculum should reflect your organization’s unique risks, certain topics form the foundation of any comprehensive security awareness program.

Phishing and Social Engineering: Teach employees to recognize suspicious emails, verify sender identities, and understand common social engineering tactics. Cover email phishing, vishing (voice phishing), smishing (SMS phishing), and business email compromise.

Password Security and Authentication: Cover password best practices, the importance of unique passwords for different accounts, password managers, and multi-factor authentication. Explain why these measures matter and make them easy to implement.

Data Protection and Privacy: Train employees on handling sensitive data, understanding data classification levels, secure file sharing, and compliance requirements relevant to your industry (GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, etc.).

Mobile Device Security: Address the security implications of smartphones, tablets, and laptops used for work. Cover device encryption, secure WiFi practices, app permissions, and what to do if a device is lost or stolen.

Physical Security: Don’t overlook physical security measures. Train employees on badge access, visitor management, clean desk policies, secure disposal of documents, and preventing tailgating.

Incident Reporting: Ensure every employee knows how to report suspected security incidents, who to contact, and what information to provide. Make the reporting process as simple as possible to encourage prompt reporting.

Measuring Training Effectiveness

You can’t improve what you don’t measure. Effective security awareness programs include robust metrics that go beyond simple completion rates.

Track Behavior Change Metrics

The ultimate measure of success is behavior change. Track metrics that reflect actual security improvements, such as phishing simulation click rates over time, time to report suspicious emails, password strength compliance rates, and security incident frequency by department.

Compare these metrics to your baseline measurements. Look for trends over time rather than fixating on single data points. Improvement should be steady and sustained.

Collect Qualitative Feedback

Numbers tell part of the story, but employee feedback reveals how training is experienced. Conduct post-training surveys that ask about content relevance, engagement level, confidence in applying skills, and suggestions for improvement.

Hold focus groups with employees from different departments to understand how security awareness training impacts their daily work. This feedback helps you refine content and delivery methods.

Report Results to Leadership

Security awareness training requires ongoing investment. Regular reporting to leadership demonstrates program value and secures continued support. Create quarterly or annual reports that showcase training completion rates, behavior change metrics, security incident trends, and ROI calculations based on incidents prevented.

Frame your reports in business terms that resonate with executives. Instead of “employees completed training,” say “reduced phishing susceptibility by 60%, decreasing potential breach risk and associated costs.”

Common Implementation Challenges and Solutions

Even well-designed programs face obstacles. Here are the challenges I see most often and practical solutions that work.

Challenge: Low Engagement and Completion Rates

When training feels like a burden, employees procrastinate or rush through without absorbing content. Solution: Make training more engaging through gamification, shorter modules, and content that connects to employees’ actual work. Get executive sponsorship to emphasize training importance and integrate it into performance expectations.

Challenge: Training Doesn’t Scale to Large Organizations

Delivering consistent training across thousands of employees in multiple locations presents logistical challenges. Solution: Leverage learning management systems (LMS) that automate training delivery, track completion, and provide analytics. Create a core curriculum that scales while allowing for department-specific customization.

Challenge: Keeping Content Current

Cyber threats evolve rapidly, and training materials quickly become outdated. Solution: Build content review and updates into your annual plan. Subscribe to threat intelligence feeds from CISA and other reputable sources. Consider partnering with security awareness training vendors who continuously update content libraries.

Challenge: Measuring Real World Impact

Demonstrating that training prevents breaches is difficult because you’re proving a negative. Solution: Focus on measurable behavior changes and leading indicators. Track reported suspicious emails, phishing simulation performance, and security incident trends. These metrics provide evidence of program effectiveness.

Advanced Strategies for Mature Programs

Once you’ve established a solid foundation, consider these advanced strategies to elevate your program.

Develop Security Champions: Identify and train enthusiastic employees in each department to serve as security champions. These individuals receive advanced training and act as local resources, reinforcing security messages and encouraging best practices among their peers.

Implement Adaptive Learning Paths: Use data from simulations and assessments to create personalized learning paths. Employees who struggle with phishing recognition receive additional targeted training in that area, while those who demonstrate proficiency can advance to more complex topics.

Create Real World Practice Opportunities: Move beyond simulations to create safe opportunities for employees to practice security skills. Set up a reporting mechanism specifically for suspicious emails, hold security challenges or capture the flag events, or run tabletop exercises that walk through incident response scenarios.

Integrate Security into Onboarding: Don’t wait until new employees have been on the job for months. Incorporate security awareness training into day one onboarding so security becomes part of the organizational culture from the start.

Partnering with Training Experts

Building an effective security awareness program requires expertise in both cybersecurity and instructional design. Many organizations benefit from partnering with training specialists who can accelerate program development and ensure best practices.

At Training Camp, we bring decades of experience in accelerated learning and certification preparation. The same instructional design principles that help professionals earn certifications like Security+, CISSP, and other top cybersecurity credentials can strengthen your organization’s security awareness program.

Whether you’re building a program from scratch or enhancing an existing one, consider how expert training partners can provide curriculum development support, training delivery, measurement and analytics, and continuous content updates.

Your Action Plan for Building an Effective Program

Ready to build or improve your security awareness training program? Here’s your roadmap.

Phase 1: Foundation (Months 1 to 3) Conduct security risk assessment, establish baseline metrics through initial phishing simulation, map audience segments and their specific risks, secure executive sponsorship and budget, select or develop core training content, choose your learning management system.

Phase 2: Launch (Months 4 to 6) Roll out initial training to all employees, conduct first post-training phishing simulation, gather feedback through surveys and focus groups, analyze completion rates and initial behavior metrics, adjust content based on feedback and results.

Phase 3: Optimization (Months 7 to 12) Implement continuous learning touchpoints, launch targeted training for high-risk groups, develop security champion program, create adaptive learning paths based on performance, measure year over year improvement and report results to leadership.

The Path Forward

Security awareness training is no longer optional. With human error contributing to the vast majority of security breaches, investing in your employees’ security knowledge is one of the most cost-effective risk mitigation strategies available.

The principles I’ve shared come from decades of experience helping professionals learn complex technical material and apply it effectively. Whether you’re training someone to pass a certification exam or recognize a phishing email, the fundamentals remain the same. Make it relevant, make it engaging, provide practice opportunities, measure results, and continuously improve.

Security awareness training works when it changes behavior, and behavior changes when training is designed with adult learning principles in mind. Your employees want to do the right thing. Your job is to give them the knowledge, skills, and confidence to recognize threats and respond appropriately.

Together, we will change the way people learn about security, transforming it from an annual compliance checkbox into a continuous culture of awareness and protection.

Training Camp has helped nearly 100,000 professionals advance their careers through expert-led, accelerated training programs. Our expertise in instructional design and cybersecurity education can help your organization build a security awareness program that delivers measurable results. Visit trainingcamp.com to learn more about our corporate training solutions.

 

Cybersecurity for CEOs: What Every Executive Needs to Know About Protecting Their Business

 

Let me be direct. In my 25 years running Training Camp, I’ve watched nearly 100,000 IT professionals pass through our programs. I’ve seen the cybersecurity landscape evolve from a technical afterthought to a boardroom imperative. And here’s what keeps me up at night: most CEOs still don’t understand that cybersecurity isn’t an IT problem. It’s a business survival problem.

The average data breach now costs $4.45 million, according to IBM’s latest research. But the real damage goes beyond the immediate financial hit. Your reputation takes years to rebuild. Customer trust evaporates overnight. Regulatory fines pile up. And in some cases, companies simply don’t recover.

This article cuts through the noise and gives you what you actually need to know as a CEO. Not the technical jargon, not the fear mongering. Just the strategic framework to protect your business, make smart investments, and build a security culture that actually works.

Why CEOs Can’t Delegate Cybersecurity Anymore

I remember when cybersecurity was something you handed to your IT director and forgot about. Those days are gone. Here’s why you need to own this.

First, the board and your investors are asking harder questions. After high profile breaches at major corporations, governance bodies are demanding that executives demonstrate clear oversight of cyber risk. You’re accountable, whether you like it or not.

Second, cyber insurance premiums have skyrocketed, and insurers are getting picky about who they’ll cover. They want to see executive engagement, documented security policies, and regular training. If you can’t demonstrate those things, you might not get coverage at all.

Third, and this is the one that hits hardest, your competitors are investing heavily in security. The companies that treat cybersecurity as a competitive advantage are winning contracts, especially in regulated industries. If you’re behind, you’re leaving money on the table.

The Five Questions Every CEO Should Ask (And Actually Understand the Answers)

Forget the technical details for a moment. These are the strategic questions that matter.

1. What Are We Actually Protecting?

You can’t protect everything equally, and you shouldn’t try. Your security team needs clear direction on what matters most to the business. Is it customer data? Intellectual property? Manufacturing systems? Financial records?

I learned this lesson back in my days producing music under the name ZENBI. In the studio, you can’t make every track the loudest. You prioritize. You decide what deserves the most attention in the mix. Security works the same way. Identify your crown jewels and build your defenses around them.

2. Who Has Access to What?

Most breaches happen because someone has access to something they shouldn’t. This includes employees, contractors, vendors, and former staff who never got removed from the system.

Ask your IT team for an access audit. You want to know who can see sensitive data, who can move money, who can change critical systems. If they can’t answer quickly, that’s your first red flag.

3. How Long Would It Take Us to Recover?

Forget preventing every attack. That’s impossible. The real question is: if we got hit tomorrow, how long until we’re operational again?

Your team should be able to tell you the recovery time objective for critical systems. Can you process orders? Can you pay employees? Can you communicate with customers? If these systems went down for a week, would your business survive?

4. Are We Training Our People?

Here’s something that drives me crazy. Companies will spend millions on security technology but nothing on security training. Then they act surprised when an employee clicks a phishing link that brings down the entire network.

Your employees are either your strongest defense or your weakest link. Regular security awareness training isn’t optional anymore. It’s baseline. And it needs to be engaging, not just an annual checkbox exercise that people sleep through.

5. What’s Our Incident Response Plan?

When a breach happens, the first 24 hours determine everything. Do you know who’s in charge? Who calls the lawyers? Who talks to customers? Who handles the media?

If you don’t have a documented incident response plan that’s been tested in the last year, you’re flying blind. And trust me, you don’t want to be making these decisions for the first time during a crisis.

Building a Security Culture That Actually Works

Technology alone won’t save you. I’ve seen companies with state of the art security systems get breached because their culture was broken.

Security culture starts at the top. If you’re not following security policies, neither will anyone else. Use multi factor authentication. Don’t share passwords. Don’t click suspicious links. Lead by example.

Make security part of performance reviews. Not as a punishment mechanism, but as recognition. Celebrate employees who report suspicious emails. Reward teams that complete security training. Make it clear that security matters to the business.

Create a no blame culture for security incidents. If employees are afraid to report mistakes, you’ll never know about problems until it’s too late. Make it safe to say “I think I clicked something I shouldn’t have” so your team can respond immediately.

The Hidden Costs of Weak Cybersecurity

Everyone talks about breach costs, but there are quieter expenses that add up.

Lost productivity is huge. When systems go down, your entire workforce sits idle. I’ve seen companies lose hundreds of thousands in a single day because a ransomware attack locked them out of their own data.

Customer churn accelerates after a breach. People remember when you lose their data. They remember when their credit card information gets stolen because your security was sloppy. They take their business elsewhere.

Recruiting becomes harder. Top talent wants to work for companies that take security seriously. If you’re known for having weak security practices, the best candidates will go to your competitors.

Business opportunities dry up. More clients are requiring security certifications and audits before they’ll sign contracts. If you can’t demonstrate strong security practices, you won’t even get to the negotiating table.

What to Look for When Hiring Security Talent

The cybersecurity talent shortage is real. According to Cyberseek, there are over 700,000 open security positions in the United States right now. So when you find good people, you need to recognize them.

Look for certifications that matter. CompTIA Security+ is the baseline for anyone serious about cybersecurity. It’s approved by the Department of Defense and validates foundational knowledge. Beyond that, certifications like CISSP, CEH, and CySA+ indicate deeper expertise.

But don’t just chase credentials. The best security professionals combine technical skills with business acumen. They can explain complex threats in terms you understand. They think strategically about risk, not just tactically about tools.

Consider building talent internally. Some of your best security people might already be on your IT team. Investing in cybersecurity training for your existing staff often delivers better ROI than constantly competing for external talent.

Real World Perspective

At Training Camp, we’ve helped train security professionals for everyone from Fortune 500 companies to small businesses. The organizations that succeed share one trait: they treat security as an ongoing investment, not a one time expense. They budget for training, they update their practices regularly, and they make security a core part of their business strategy.

The ROI of Getting Security Right

Let’s talk numbers, because that’s what matters in the boardroom.

Companies with strong security practices pay lower insurance premiums. We’re talking 10% to 30% savings on cyber insurance, which adds up quickly.

They win more contracts. Security certifications like SOC 2 and ISO 27001 open doors to enterprise clients who won’t work with vendors that can’t demonstrate strong security controls.

They avoid regulatory fines. With regulations like GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA carrying penalties that can reach millions, compliance isn’t optional. Strong security practices keep you on the right side of regulators.

Most importantly, they sleep better at night. As a CEO, you’ve got enough to worry about. Security shouldn’t keep you up wondering if tomorrow’s the day your business gets ransomwared.

Your 90 Day Action Plan

Here’s what you should do in the next three months.

Month 1: Assessment Schedule a security audit with an external firm. Get an honest assessment of where you stand. Review your incident response plan, or create one if it doesn’t exist. Meet with your security lead to understand current risks.

Month 2: Quick Wins Implement multi factor authentication across the organization. Update and enforce password policies. Launch a company wide phishing simulation to see where your vulnerabilities are. Start security awareness training for all employees.

Month 3: Strategic Planning Develop a three year security roadmap with clear milestones and budgets. Identify skills gaps in your security team and create training plans. Review vendor security practices and tighten third party risk management. Present your security strategy to the board with clear metrics and accountability.

The Bottom Line

Cybersecurity isn’t going away. The threats are getting more sophisticated. The stakes are getting higher. And the responsibility sits squarely on your desk.

But here’s the good news. You don’t need to become a technical expert. You need to ask the right questions, invest in the right people, and build a culture where security is everyone’s job.

The companies that get this right don’t just survive in today’s threat landscape. They use security as a competitive advantage. They win more business. They attract better talent. They build stronger customer relationships.

Together, we will change the way organizations think about security. Not as a cost center, but as a business enabler. Not as an IT problem, but as a strategic imperative.

The question isn’t whether you can afford to invest in cybersecurity. It’s whether you can afford not to.

Since 1999, Training Camp has been accelerating technology education and helping organizations build stronger security teams. If your company needs to upskill its workforce in cybersecurity, we’ve trained nearly 100,000 professionals and we know what works. Visit trainingcamp.com to learn how we can help protect your business through education.

 

IAPP CIPT vs ISACA CPDSE: How to Pick the Best Privacy Engineering Certification

Last month, while I was working from a quiet café in Denmark (my dogs were curled up at my feet and not interested in my certification research), three different clients asked me the same question: “Should I get the CIPT or the CPDSE?” This question is becoming more common as privacy engineering goes from being a nice-to-have skill to an essential competency. The IAPP’s Certified Information Privacy Technologist (CIPT) and ISACA’s Certified Privacy and Data Security Engineer (CPDSE) both say they will prove your privacy tech skills, but they do it in very different ways. After spending a lot of time with both certifications and seeing how my coworkers went about getting them, I can tell you that the choice isn’t just about which letters look better after your name. It’s about knowing where you want your career to go and which framework fits with how you think about privacy in tech. Spoiler alert: I picked the clear winner, and it’s the one I chose.

Getting to know the privacy engineering landscape

Privacy engineering is the area where legal compliance, technical implementation, and human behavior all come together. I’ve been working in security awareness and social engineering for years in this area. You need to know how privacy principles affect real code, system design, and organizational processes. Just knowing the GDPR articles or how to set up encryption is not enough. There needs to be someone who can connect lawyers who say “we need to collect less data” with developers who ask “but how exactly?”

There is a huge need for privacy engineers. I recently helped a fintech startup put privacy-by-design principles into action, and I saw them have trouble finding qualified candidates who could speak both privacy and technology fluently. Businesses are learning that they can’t just add privacy later; they have to build it into systems from the ground up. This is where certifications like CIPT and CPDSE come in. Each of these tries to prove this mixed set of skills.

IAPP CIPT: The Technical Bridge for Privacy Professionals

IAPP created the CIPT to answer the question, “How do we help privacy professionals understand technology?” It’s for people who already know about privacy but need to learn how technology can help or hurt those principles. You could say that it’s like teaching engineers how to talk about privacy instead of teaching privacy professionals how to talk about engineering.

What CIPT Includes

The CIPT curriculum is like a guide for translating privacy ideas into technical language. It talks about IT infrastructure and how data moves through systems, privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) like homomorphic encryption and differential privacy, privacy engineering methods, and the technical parts of privacy impact assessments. When I looked over the materials, I was struck by how they put privacy first when talking about technology. You’re not just learning about databases; you’re learning about them in the context of minimizing data.

CIPT Core Domains:

• Privacy in Applications and Systems (40% of the test)

• Privacy in the Tech World (30% of the test)

• Privacy Skills (20% of the test)

• Privacy during the Development Lifecycle (10% of the test)

The CIPT Method

CIPT is different because it assumes that you already know about privacy law and principles. During a training session I went to in Aarhus (where I drank way too much coffee between sessions), the teacher spent very little time talking about what GDPR requires and a lot of time talking about how to technically implement those requirements. It’s not so much “why privacy matters” as it is “how to make your tech stack private.”

Zero-knowledge proofs and secure multi-party computation are two new privacy technologies that the certification covers. CIPT may seem a little old-fashioned compared to CPDSE’s thorough coverage of modern architectures and current privacy issues. It’s trying to keep up with new technologies, but you can tell that it wasn’t made for cloud-native, AI-driven, or edge computing environments from the start.

ISACA CPDSE: The Privacy Certification for Engineers

CIPT teaches privacy professionals about technology, while CPDSE teaches technology professionals about privacy and security, which ISACA sees as two sides of the same coin. ISACA created this certification because they knew that privacy and data security engineering needs more specialized knowledge than just IT security or privacy law.

What CPDSE Includes

CPDSE looks at privacy and security as two sides of the same coin, which is a more complete way of looking at things. It seems like engineers who have had to put privacy programs into action made the curriculum. It talks about governance and risk management from a technical point of view, secure software development with privacy in mind, data lifecycle management that includes strategies for keeping and deleting data, and how to respond to both security breaches and privacy violations.

Knowledge Areas for CPDSE:

• Privacy Governance (23% of the test)

• Architecture of Privacy (29% of the test)

• Managing the data lifecycle (26% of the test)

• Applications of Privacy Technology (22% of the exam)

The Mindset of Engineering First

I worked with a CPDSE-certified engineer on a recent simulated breach exercise for a healthcare client. What really stood out to me was how naturally they included privacy concerns in their incident response process. It wasn’t an afterthought or a box to check for compliance; it was a key part of the technical response. The CPDSE way of thinking is that privacy isn’t a separate issue; it’s part of every technical choice. The fact that the certification covers new threats like supply chain attacks, API vulnerabilities, and cloud misconfigurations shows how much more up-to-date it is than older privacy certifications.

The certification assumes that you know a lot about technical things like API security, database architecture, and DevOps practices. Then it adds privacy requirements on top of this technical base, showing you how to build systems that are private by design instead of by policy. What makes CPDSE better is that it focuses on the technologies that businesses are using today, like containerization, microservices, and serverless architectures, instead of the old systems from ten years ago.

More Than Just a Point of View: Key Differences

There are more differences between CIPT and CPDSE than just their target audiences. They embody fundamentally divergent philosophies regarding privacy engineering, and frankly, one resonates considerably more with the industry’s trajectory. It didn’t take me long to figure out which certification was better for me—CPDSE is just the better, more complete choice.

Aspect IAPP CIPT ISACA CPDSE
Main Focus Privacy technology for privacy experts Privacy and security engineering for technical experts
Prerequisites There are no official requirements, but it is highly recommended that you know a lot about privacy You need at least five years of experience (three years of privacy/security and two years of general IT)
Format of the test 90 multiple-choice questions in 2.5 hours 120 multiple-choice questions in 3 hours
Passing Score 300 out of 500 points 450 out of 800 points
Maintenance 20 CPE credits each year 120 CPE credits over three years
Technical Depth Moderate technical depth means that you need to understand technology Deep technical depth means that you need to have hands-on experience with it

Table: A Comparison of CIPT and CPDSE

Different Philosophies

CIPT sees privacy as a separate field that needs to be understood in technical terms. It teaches how technology supports privacy principles while keeping privacy principles at the top of the list. On the other hand, CPDSE sees privacy as an important part of designing a secure system. You can’t have one without the other. This integrated approach seems to fit better with how modern businesses really work.

This difference in philosophy is clear in how each certification deals with real-life situations. CIPT might ask, “How can technology help achieve purpose limitation?” and CPDSE might ask, “How do you architect a system that enforces purpose limitation while maintaining performance and security?” The CPDSE approach is more useful and actionable—it’s the difference between understanding the theory and actually building the solution.

Impact on your career and recognition in the market

This is where things get interesting, and it’s also where my conversations with other consultants at the coffee shop get lively. The market’s recognition of these certifications varies a lot by location and industry.

CIPT in the Market

CIPT is well-known in privacy-related jobs, especially in companies that have well-established privacy programs. While traveling through European tech hubs, I’ve seen that CIPT is still important in markets that care about GDPR. However, this is changing as more companies learn about CPDSE. When companies are looking for privacy program managers or DPOs who know how to use technology, they sometimes say they want someone with CIPT. However, they are adding “or CPDSE” to job postings more and more often.

The IAPP brand is important because it is the largest group of privacy professionals in the world. When I see CIPT on a resume, I know that the person knows about privacy and has tried to learn how to implement it technically. But I’m seeing more and more hiring managers choose CPDSE because it takes a more thorough and up-to-date approach to privacy engineering.

CPDSE in the Market

CPDSE is newer (it started in 2022), but ISACA has a strong reputation in IT governance and security. What makes it stand out is how up-to-date and thorough it is. ISACA has clearly learned from watching the privacy engineering field change and made something that deals with real problems today, not just ideas from the past. It works especially well in companies where privacy is seen as a part of the bigger picture of security and risk management. Companies in the financial, healthcare, and technology sectors seem to be especially interested in hiring people who have CPDSE certification.

It’s interesting to see how technical teams are reacting to CPDSE. People see engineers and architects with CPDSE as privacy-aware technologists instead of privacy professionals who are trying to learn more about technology. This small difference can have a big effect on your role and power in technical organizations. The certification feels more up-to-date and useful because it talks about cloud-native architectures, DevSecOps, and AI privacy in ways that don’t feel like they were added on later.

Observation in the Real World

I’ve seen a clear change in my consulting work. Some companies start their privacy programs from scratch with CIPT holders, but the best ones I’ve seen are led by CPDSE professionals. The CPDSE’s more thorough and up-to-date method of privacy engineering just works better. This is why I chose CPDSE for myself: I wanted the certification that would give me the most useful, real-world knowledge. Companies that get this are specifically looking for CPDSE-certified professionals to fill their important privacy engineering positions, and they’re willing to pay a lot more for that knowledge.

Why CPDSE Wins: Making Your Choice

After all this comparing, you might be wondering which one you should go with. Let me tell you about the framework I use when I give advice to coworkers and clients, as well as why I chose CPDSE.

You Might Want to Think About CIPT If…

If you work in privacy and want to learn more about technology, you might want to think about CIPT. If you’re a privacy professional who needs to talk to tech teams, a lawyer or compliance professional moving into privacy technology, or a consultant who needs to connect privacy and technology areas, it might work. If you are building or running privacy programs that need technical implementation, CIPT also makes sense.

I’ve seen CIPT help professionals who need to keep their credibility in privacy circles. It shows that you tried to learn about both worlds. But even for these experts, I often suggest CPDSE instead because it gives you more up-to-date and useful information that you can use right away to solve problems.

Why You Should Pick CPDSE

If you’re a technical professional who wants to add privacy to your skills, CPDSE is the better choice. In fact, it’s the better choice all around. This is the exact reason I chose it. It’s great for software engineers, architects, or DevOps professionals who work on systems that need to protect privacy, security professionals who want to learn more about privacy engineering, or technical leaders who are in charge of designing systems that follow privacy rules. The certification is also good for people who work for companies that combine privacy with security and risk management.

I was glad I had my CPDSE training when I worked on a recent project to help a development team add privacy controls to their CI/CD pipeline. The certification not only helped me figure out what needed to be done, but it also taught me how to add privacy controls to existing workflows without slowing down work. The CPDSE’s modern, useful approach let me deal with problems that weren’t even on the radar when CIPT was made.

A Note About Getting Both

If you’re trying to become a privacy engineering expert, start a consulting business in privacy technology, lead privacy transformation in technical organizations, or work in highly regulated industries where both privacy and security are very important, having both certifications can be helpful.

I know a few consultants who have done both, but most of them started with CPDSE because it covers more topics and then added CIPT later for the IAPP brand recognition. If you can only pick one, and let’s be honest, most of us have to choose, CPDSE is the clear winner. It has a modern, useful approach and covers a lot of ground, making it the best choice for anyone who wants to work in privacy engineering today. I chose it, and I tell everyone who asks to do the same.

CPDSE Owns the Future

I’m sitting in a cozy café in Denmark, where my dogs have become minor celebrities among the regulars, and I’m thinking about the future of privacy engineering certifications. The field is changing quickly, and new problems are arising because of AI privacy, quantum-resistant cryptography, and decentralized identity systems. This is where CPDSE really stands out: it was made with these new technologies in mind. CIPT, on the other hand, sometimes seems like it’s trying to catch up. I chose CPDSE for my own certification path because of this forward-thinking approach.

Both organizations are updating their certifications, but ISACA’s approach with CPDSE feels more forward-thinking. CIPT just added information about AI and machine learning privacy, but CPDSE was made from the ground up to deal with new architectures and privacy issues that are coming up. It includes cloud-native privacy controls, zero-trust architectures, and privacy-preserving computation in ways that seem like they belong to the certification instead of being added on.

It’s clear that privacy engineering is a field that will be around for a long time. Both certifications are useful, but CPDSE is the better choice for professionals who are serious about privacy engineering because it is more up-to-date and covers more ground. Its emphasis on practical implementation and its combination of privacy and security better reflect where the industry is going, not where it’s been.

In the end, CPDSE is the clear choice.

It’s not just about picking a certification when you choose between CIPT and CPDSE. It’s also about figuring out what your role is in the privacy engineering ecosystem. Are you a privacy expert who is learning how to use technology, or a technologist who is learning how to protect privacy? Your answer to that question is important, but honestly, CPDSE does a better job of covering both sides. When I was making this choice, I realized that CPDSE would give me the best and most useful background for solving real-world privacy engineering problems.

I’ve seen both certifications open doors and create opportunities in my work helping businesses create cultures that respect privacy. People who have a CIPT often become the translators who help privacy and engineering teams talk to each other. People who work in CPDSE become the builders who turn privacy requirements into working systems. More and more, organizations are looking to these people to lead privacy engineering teams. The CPDSE’s more thorough and up-to-date method makes professionals who are better prepared for the problems of today. That’s why I chose it and why I tell anyone who is serious about privacy engineering to do the same.

Keep in mind that certifications are not the end goal; they are tools. They show that you know what you’re talking about and show the market that you’re an expert, but the real value comes from using that knowledge to solve real problems. Both certifications have their uses, but CPDSE is just the better tool for privacy engineering today. I chose to pursue CPDSE myself because I wanted the best and most complete preparation for the problems I see my clients facing every day.

Privacy engineering needs people who can connect the dots between what the law says and how to make it happen. Both certifications are useful, but CPDSE is the clear winner because it is more up-to-date, thorough, and useful. I carefully looked at both options and chose CPDSE. I haven’t regretted it for a second. CPDSE is the certification you want because it shows where the field is going, not where it has been. It’s not enough to have letters after your name; you need to have the most useful, relevant knowledge to solve today’s privacy engineering problems. Believe me when I say this: choose CPDSE.

Getting Started in Cybersecurity: Entry Level Certifications and Career Paths

Breaking into cybersecurity feels overwhelming when you’re staring at dozens of certifications, conflicting advice, and job postings that all seem to want five years of experience for entry level roles. I talk to people every week who want to start a cybersecurity career but have no idea which certification to pursue first or whether they even qualify for the jobs they’re seeing.

The good news? There’s a clear path forward, and you don’t need a computer science degree or years of experience to begin. What you need is the right foundation and a realistic understanding of where entry level roles actually exist in this field.

Why Cybersecurity Is Worth Your Time

Before we dive into certifications and career paths, let me tell you why this field is exploding with opportunity. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, information security analyst roles are projected to grow 33% through 2033. That’s much faster than average for any profession.

The reason is simple. Every organization, from small businesses to multinational corporations, needs cybersecurity professionals. Breaches are getting more sophisticated, regulations are getting stricter, and the stakes are higher than ever. Companies are desperate for people who can help protect their systems and data.

What makes this field particularly attractive is the variety of roles available. You can work in incident response, security operations, compliance, penetration testing, security architecture, or governance. Each path requires different skills and appeals to different personalities. Some people love the adrenaline rush of responding to active threats. Others prefer the strategic thinking required for security program management.

The Reality About Entry Level Cybersecurity Jobs

Here’s something I wish someone had told me earlier in my career. True entry level cybersecurity jobs are rarer than people think. Most organizations want you to have at least some IT experience before they’ll trust you with their security. That might sound discouraging, but it actually makes sense. How can you secure systems if you don’t understand how they work in the first place?

The typical path into cybersecurity starts with general IT work. Maybe you spend a year or two in help desk support, system administration, or network operations. During that time, you learn how technology actually functions in real organizations. You see how users behave, how systems fail, and where vulnerabilities emerge naturally through everyday operations.

Then you transition into security specific roles. This progression isn’t a waste of time. The IT fundamentals you build early on become the foundation for everything you do in cybersecurity later. When you’re analyzing a potential breach, that help desk experience helps you understand user behavior. When you’re hardening systems, that admin background tells you what’s realistic and what’s not.

During my consulting work, I’ve trained security teams across Europe. The professionals who succeed fastest aren’t necessarily the ones with the most certifications. They’re the ones who spent time in the trenches learning how technology actually works in messy, real world environments.

Best Entry Level Certifications to Start With

Certifications matter in cybersecurity, but not all certifications are created equal for beginners. Let me walk you through the ones that actually help you get that first job and build real skills.

CompTIA Security Plus

If you’re going to get one certification to start your cybersecurity career, make it Security Plus. This is the industry standard entry point for cybersecurity professionals. It covers all the fundamentals including network security, cryptography, identity management, risk management, and incident response basics.

What makes Security Plus particularly valuable is its recognition. The U.S. Department of Defense requires it for many positions under DoD Directive 8140 (formerly 8570). That means if you want to work in government cybersecurity or with defense contractors, you need this certification. But even outside government work, most employers recognize Security Plus as proof you understand core security concepts.

The exam itself is performance based, which means you’ll face simulated scenarios where you have to configure security settings or analyze logs, not just answer multiple choice questions. This format ensures you can actually apply what you’ve learned, not just memorize definitions.

CompTIA Network Plus

Before you tackle Security Plus, consider starting with Network Plus. This certification teaches you how networks actually function, which is essential knowledge for any cybersecurity professional. You can’t secure a network if you don’t understand TCP/IP, routing, switching, and network protocols.

Network Plus covers network architecture, operations, security fundamentals, and troubleshooting. It’s vendor neutral, so you’re learning concepts that apply everywhere rather than specific product configurations. Many people find that having Network Plus makes Security Plus much easier to understand because you already grasp the underlying infrastructure.

Systems Security Certified Practitioner (SSCP)

The SSCP from (ISC)² is another solid entry level option, particularly if you already have some IT experience. It requires one year of work experience in one or more of the seven SSCP domains, though you can take the exam without experience and earn an Associate of (ISC)² designation until you meet the requirement.

SSCP covers security operations and administration, access controls, risk identification and response, incident response and recovery, cryptography, network and communications security, and systems and application security. It’s more technical than Security Plus in some areas, which makes it valuable if you’re aiming for hands on security operations roles.

My Recommendation: Start with Security Plus if you’re relatively new to IT. Add Network Plus first if networking concepts feel shaky. Consider SSCP after you have a year of experience and want to deepen your technical security skills. Don’t try to collect every certification at once. Focus on building real skills and getting practical experience.

Popular Advanced Certifications to Aim For

Once you’ve established yourself in cybersecurity and gained a few years of experience, you’ll want to pursue more advanced certifications. These credentials open doors to senior positions and significantly boost your earning potential.

Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP)

The CISSP is often called the gold standard in cybersecurity certifications. It’s designed for experienced security practitioners, managers, and executives with at least five years of cumulative paid work experience in two or more of the eight CISSP domains. (ISC)² offers some ways to satisfy this requirement through education or other credentials, but the bottom line is this isn’t a beginner certification.

What makes CISSP valuable is its breadth. The eight domains cover security and risk management, asset security, security architecture and engineering, communication and network security, identity and access management, security assessment and testing, security operations, and software development security. You need to understand security at a strategic level, not just tactical implementation.

CISSP holders typically work in roles like security consultant, security manager, IT director, security auditor, security architect, or CISO. According to (ISC)², CISSP certified professionals earn significantly more than their non-certified peers.

Certified Ethical Hacker (CEH)

If you’re interested in the offensive side of security, the CEH from EC-Council teaches you to think like an attacker. The certification covers reconnaissance, scanning networks, enumeration, system hacking, malware threats, sniffing, social engineering, denial of service, session hijacking, evading IDS/firewalls, hacking web applications, SQL injection, and cryptography.

CEH is popular among penetration testers, security analysts, and anyone who needs to understand attack techniques to better defend against them. It’s more hands on than CISSP and focuses specifically on offensive security skills.

Certified Information Security Manager (CISM)

The CISM from ISACA is designed for security managers and those who manage, design, and oversee an enterprise’s information security program. Unlike CISSP, which has a technical focus, CISM emphasizes management and governance. It’s ideal if you’re moving toward leadership roles rather than staying in technical implementation.

CISM covers information security governance, information risk management, information security program development and management, and information security incident management. You need at least five years of work experience in information security management to earn the certification.

The choice between advanced certifications should align with your career direction. Want to stay technical? CISSP or CEH might be your path. Moving toward management? CISM is designed exactly for that transition. Think about where you want to be in five years, not just what sounds impressive today.

Why Incident Response Is Booming Right Now

One area of cybersecurity that’s seeing explosive growth is incident response. Every week seems to bring news of another major breach, ransomware attack, or data compromise. Organizations are realizing they need dedicated teams ready to respond when, not if, something goes wrong.

Incident response professionals are the cybersecurity equivalent of emergency medical teams. When an attack happens, they’re the ones who spring into action to contain the damage, investigate what happened, recover systems, and prevent it from happening again. It’s high pressure work that requires both technical skills and the ability to stay calm under stress.

What makes incident response particularly appealing is the constant learning. Every incident is different. You’re analyzing new attack techniques, reverse engineering malware, tracking threat actors, and connecting digital breadcrumbs to understand exactly what happened. It’s detective work combined with technical analysis.

The demand for incident responders far exceeds the supply. According to the (ISC)² Cybersecurity Workforce Study, organizations report significant gaps in their incident response capabilities. This translates to competitive salaries, job security, and plenty of advancement opportunities.

Skills You Need for Incident Response

Getting into incident response requires a solid technical foundation. You need to understand operating systems (particularly Windows and Linux at a deep level), networking protocols and traffic analysis, common attack vectors and malware behavior, forensic analysis techniques, and log analysis and SIEM tools.

But technical skills alone aren’t enough. Incident responders also need strong communication abilities because you’ll be explaining technical findings to non-technical stakeholders, often in high stress situations. You need analytical thinking to piece together what happened from incomplete evidence. And you need the ability to work under pressure when systems are down and executives are demanding answers.

Certifications for Incident Response

The Certified Incident Handler (ECIH) from EC-Council is another option that covers incident handling and response from a vendor neutral perspective. It teaches you how to handle various types of cybersecurity incidents, manage incident response teams, and implement proper processes.

Many incident responders also pursue digital forensics certifications because the skills overlap significantly. Understanding how to preserve evidence, analyze compromised systems, and document findings is crucial for both disciplines.

From My Experience: Some of the most rewarding work I’ve done involved helping organizations improve their incident response capabilities. There’s something deeply satisfying about building a team that can confidently handle whatever threats come their way. If you like solving puzzles, thrive under pressure, and want to be on the front lines of cybersecurity defense, incident response might be your calling.

Building Your Path Forward

Getting started in cybersecurity isn’t about rushing to collect as many certifications as possible. It’s about building a strong foundation, gaining real experience, and strategically advancing your skills over time.

Start with Security Plus to establish your baseline security knowledge. Get some hands on experience in IT or security operations. Then pursue advanced certifications that align with your specific career goals, whether that’s technical depth, management, or specialized areas like incident response.

The field needs people at every level. It needs entry level analysts monitoring alerts, mid-level engineers implementing controls, senior architects designing security systems, and leaders developing strategy. Find where you fit based on your interests and strengths, then build toward that goal systematically.

Cybersecurity offers genuine career opportunities with room for growth, competitive compensation, and the satisfaction of protecting organizations from real threats. It’s challenging work, but if you’re willing to put in the effort to learn, there’s a place for you in this field.

 

What are the best IT certifications for people who are just starting out?

The certification landscape was easier but also stricter when I started my IT career. You chose a vendor track, like Microsoft, Cisco, or CompTIA, and used it as a guide. There are hundreds of certifications available today for beginners, covering cloud, security, networking, and new technologies. I’ve mentored many junior engineers and looked over many resumes. I’ve found that these certifications always help new people get jobs and set them up for long-term success.

Getting the right certification isn’t just about passing a test; it’s also about showing that you can solve real problems. I’ve seen too many people with big lists of certifications who couldn’t fix a simple network problem. This guide is all about certifications that teach useful skills, are respected by employers, and make it easy to move up in your career. I want to tell you what I’ve learned over the past 20+ years of building teams, doing interviews, and seeing careers take off or fail based on certification choices.

The Foundation: CompTIA’s Most Important Certifications

CompTIA certifications are still the best for beginners in IT because they aren’t tied to any one company, are well-known, and teach concepts that can be used anywhere. You could say that they are learning the rules of technology before focusing on certain dialects. Everyone who hires knows these certifications, and more importantly, they trust what they mean. I know that a candidate with CompTIA certifications has a structured understanding of IT basics instead of random, self-taught knowledge when I see them on their resume.

I think 90% of beginners should start with CompTIA A+, no matter what their goals are. It teaches the basic skills that every IT professional needs, like hardware, operating systems, basic networking, and troubleshooting. I still use A+ knowledge every day to figure out why something isn’t working right or to explain technical ideas to people who aren’t technical. The certification teaches a methodical way to fix problems that can be used on any technology issue, like a printer that won’t connect or a cloud service that keeps failing for no reason.

A+ is especially useful for beginners because it covers a lot of ground. You learn how computers really work, from the signals that go through the motherboard to the way operating systems handle resources. This information is the basis for everything else. You will know what is being virtualized when you study virtualization later. You’ll know what you’re protecting when you learn about security. A+ certified professionals are very useful right away because every company needs someone who can figure out why a computer won’t start or why a printer won’t connect.

You need to pass two tests to get the certification. Core 1 is all about hardware, networking, mobile devices, virtualization, and cloud computing. Core 2 is all about operating systems like Windows, macOS, and Linux, as well as security, software troubleshooting, and operational procedures. This two-exam format is similar to what IT generalists do every day, when they have to deal with both hardware and software problems. If you’re a complete beginner, you should plan on studying for 2 to 3 months. If you already know some tech, you can learn it faster. The investment opens up jobs as help desk workers, desktop support workers, and field technicians, which usually pay between $40,000 and $55,000 to start.

Network+ changed the way I thought about IT infrastructure. I knew a lot about computers before I got it. After that, I knew how systems worked. This certification teaches you how data moves, why latency matters, and how to make networks that don’t break when someone microwaves their lunch. The information is useful whether you’re setting up cloud environments, fixing application performance issues, or telling management why the company needs backup internet connections. Networking basics are the building blocks for every specialization, including cloud, security, and DevOps.

When people ask me what the first step in IT is, I always say Network+. You learn how whole networks work instead of just fixing one computer at a time. You learn about VLANs, subnetting, routing protocols, and how to keep your network safe. You are now much more valuable because you can fix problems that affect more than one system. You can tell if an application is running slowly because of a network problem, a server problem, or something else. To really get these ideas, set up a home lab with old computers or virtualization software. The day I set up VLANs on real switches instead of just memorizing port numbers was the day I got networking. Theoretical knowledge devoid of practical application is merely trivial.

Security+ has gone from being a specialized certification to something that everyone needs. It wasn’t required ten years ago. It’s a must-have today. No matter what IT job you have, you have to think about security, whether you’re setting up firewalls or just picking strong passwords. When you take Security+, you learn to think like both an attacker and a defender at the same time. This is a skill that is very useful in any organization. The certification covers a wide range of topics, including basic cryptography, incident response, physical security, and cloud security.

Security+ is especially useful for government contractors. It meets the requirements of DoD 8570, which opens up high-paying jobs with the federal government. But even in the private sector, hiring managers see it as proof that you won’t accidentally give away customer information or fall for phishing scams. There are performance-based questions on the test that check your ability to solve problems in the real world and do hands-on security tasks. This makes sure that you can really use what you’ve learned, not just repeat definitions. If you need focused preparation, TrainingCamp offers an intensive Security+ boot camp designed to help you pass on your first attempt.

Cloud Certifications: A Must-Have in Today’s World

In 2025, if you’re not using cloud technologies, you’re working for a company that won’t be around in 2030. That may seem dramatic, but I’ve seen too many businesses fail because they wouldn’t update their systems. Cloud certifications show that you know how to use modern infrastructure and can help businesses save money and make their systems more scalable. More importantly, they show that you are dedicated to keeping up with a field that is changing quickly.

Amazon Web Services has more than 30% of the cloud market, and their Cloud Practitioner certification is great for people who are just starting out. You don’t need to know a lot about technology to learn about cloud economics, basic services, and the shared responsibility model. You learn how to talk about cloud architecture, how cloud pricing works, and which services solve which problems. I’ve seen help desk workers use this cert to move into cloud support jobs and get pay raises of 30–40% within six months of getting the cert.

AWS Cloud Practitioner is especially useful because it can be used in so many different situations. The ideas still apply even if your company uses a different cloud provider. You know what IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS are and how they are different. You know the difference between object storage and block storage. You can take part in architecture talks and know how technical choices will affect costs. This certification usually takes 1 to 2 months of study and costs between $200 and $400, which includes the study materials.

If you want to work in corporate IT, knowing Azure is just as important as knowing Microsoft, since Microsoft is the most popular company in the world. The AZ-900 Azure Fundamentals certification is easier to get than the AWS Cloud Practitioner certification, but it is just as respected. It talks about Azure services, prices, support, and basic ideas about the cloud. I’ve told a number of Windows administrators who want to update their skills to try it, and every single one of them found new jobs within six months. The test is easy, and you usually only need 3 to 4 weeks to study for it. Microsoft also often gives away free test vouchers at their virtual training events.

The great thing about getting cloud fundamentals certifications is that they can lead to many different jobs. You might find that you enjoy designing cloud solutions and want to get Solutions Architect certifications. You might also be interested in cloud security and want to specialize in it. These entry-level certifications give you enough experience to help you make smart choices about your career path and make you more attractive to employers right away.

Specialized Paths for Specific Goals

Vendor-neutral certifications give you a lot of general knowledge, but sometimes you need to show that you know a lot about a certain platform to get the job you want. If you choose the right ones, these specialized certifications can help you move up in your career faster, but they take more time and often assume that you already know something.

The Cisco CCNA is still the best certification for people who want to work as network engineers. The new CCNA combines what used to be several tracks into one certification that covers the basics of networking, network access, IP connectivity, IP services, security, and automation. It’s a lot harder than Network+ because you need to know a lot more, but it means a lot. Every network engineer I know started out with CCNA. You can’t just memorize protocols; you have to actually understand them because of the hands-on configuration requirements. You’ll learn how to set up routers and switches, use VLANs, fix problems with connectivity, and really understand routing protocols.

CCNA is not for beginners; it assumes you already know how to set up a network. I’ve seen confident beginners fail because they went straight to CCNA without knowing the basics. You have to set up real network devices for some of the exam questions, not just answer multiple-choice questions. If you don’t have a lot of hands-on experience, start with Network+. If you want to get your CCNA, you should buy lab equipment or a good network simulator. Beginners usually have to study hard for 6 to 9 months to get the certification, but it can lead to jobs as a network administrator or junior network engineer that pay $60,000 to $80,000.

More careers have changed because of Linux+ certification than any other specialty cert I’ve seen. Linux runs everything on the internet, from web servers to cloud infrastructure to apps that run in containers. This certification shows that you know how to use Linux systems, work from the command line, and understand the operating system that runs most of the modern internet. Beginners are scared of the command line, but learning how to use it makes you a lot more valuable. You are the one who can fix problems that other people can’t even figure out.

I like Linux+ because it lets me work with the latest technology. You can use containers, Kubernetes, automation tools, and DevOps pipelines once you know how to use Linux. You can now work in environments other than Windows. The certification includes things like system architecture, installing Linux, using GNU and Unix commands, file systems, shells, scripting, and basic security. To be successful, you need to have worked with Linux for 6 to 12 months. However, the jobs it opens up—Linux administrator, DevOps engineer, cloud architect, site reliability engineer—often pay a lot more than jobs that focus on Windows.

If you want to work in help desk or service management, you should really think about getting the ITIL Foundation. ITIL isn’t sexy; it’s all about managing services, processes, and procedures. But it’s very useful. This framework shows you how to deliver, manage, and improve IT services. No matter what name they give it, every business uses some kind of ITIL. You will be better at any IT job right away if you know how to handle incidents, change control, and service level agreements.

At first, I thought ITIL was just a bunch of bureaucratic nonsense. Then I joined a team that did it right, and the time it took us to fix problems went down by 40%. The rate of our failed changes dropped dramatically. Customers were very happy. I now suggest it to anyone who wants to work in enterprise IT support or service management. The certification itself is easy to get; you usually only need to study for a few weeks. But the information you learn helps you understand how professional IT companies work. It’s especially useful if you want to learn about the business side of technology or are interested in IT management.

The Path to Strategic Certification

I’ve looked at thousands of successful IT career paths and found patterns that always work. The most important thing is to learn in the right order. Each certification should build on the one before it and open up new doors. Your path will depend on your final goal, but some sequences always lead to success.

If you want to work in general IT support, get your CompTIA A+ in your first year. This lets you work and make money while you learn. In year two, you can add either Network+ or ITIL, depending on whether you like working with technology or processes more. You should start getting cloud certifications or Microsoft-specific credentials by the third year to become more specialized and valuable. This path will take you from entry-level jobs that pay $40,000 to jobs that pay $65,000 to $75,000 in three years.

The path is clearer but harder if you want to be a network engineer. Begin with Network+ to learn the basics, then go right into CCNA. Network+ gives you a lot of general knowledge, while CCNA adds depth that is specific to a certain vendor. These two certifications work well together. Add Security+ or start working toward CCNP in year two. By the third year, you should focus on areas like wireless, security, or automation. Network engineers who follow this path often see their pay double in three years.

You need to use a different method for cloud engineering. Start with A+ to learn about the infrastructure that is being virtualized. Then, right away, get a cloud practitioner certification from AWS or Azure. In the second year, get the Solutions Architect Associate level certification from the platform of your choice. Year three should be all about specialization, like DevOps, security, or advanced architecture. If cloud engineers follow this path and get hands-on experience, they can make $80,000 to $100,000 a year in 2 to 3 years.

The foundation is even more important for careers in cybersecurity. To learn what you’re protecting, start with A+. Then add Network+ to learn how attacks spread. You should only go after Security+ after that. This three-certification foundation usually takes 12 to 18 months, but it gives security professionals all the information they need. If you want to learn more about defensive security, look into CySA+. If you want to learn more about offensive security, look into PenTest+. This path often leads to security professionals making $75,000 to $95,000 in three years.

DevOps is the newest and possibly most profitable path. To learn how to use the command line and understand the operating system that runs most DevOps tools, start with Linux+. Since most DevOps work is done in the cloud, you should get a cloud certification. Then go after specific tools, such as Docker, Kubernetes, or Terraform. DevOps engineers who know Linux, the cloud, and how to automate things can make six figures in three to five years.

Things to Avoid When Getting a Certification

I’ve seen skilled people ruin their careers by using bad certification strategies. Getting certifications without getting any experience is the most common mistake. Having five certifications but no experience makes you look desperate, not qualified. Employers want to know that you can use what you know, not just pass tests. Get a job, get a certification, and then get the next one. This cycle of learning and using what you’ve learned makes you an expert.

Another way to kill your career is to skip the basics. I often talk to people who have advanced certifications but can’t explain basic ideas. They learned enough to pass tests, but they don’t have the basic knowledge they need to solve real problems. These gaps in knowledge become walls in your career. You might get a job, but you won’t last long if you can’t do simple things. Even if it takes longer, build your knowledge in a planned way.

Not paying attention to what people want costs you time and money. That strange certification might be interesting to learn about, but will it help you get a job? Before you pay for a certification, look for jobs in your area. What certifications do job postings keep asking for? What skills do employers really want? I’ve seen people spend months getting certifications that no one in their area cares about.

Brain dumps are not only wrong, but they also don’t work. You might get certified by memorizing answers instead of learning concepts, but you’ll fail miserably in interviews and on the job. I once interviewed someone who had passed a lot of advanced certifications but couldn’t answer simple technical questions. They had used brain dumps, it turned out. They didn’t get the job, and word got around in our tech community. Brain dumps break the rules of exams, can get you kicked out of future certifications, and ruin your professional reputation.

Not working on your soft skills can hold back your career. Technical certifications show that you know something, but you get promoted when you can work well with others, solve problems, and talk to people. The best engineers I know aren’t always the ones who are the best at technical things. They’re the ones who can explain complicated ideas in simple terms, work well in groups, and handle projects. Combine technical training with professional growth. Take project management classes, join Toastmasters, or work on your technical writing.

How to Make Certifications Work: Useful Tips

Getting certified is only the first step. The real value comes from how you use that information. While you study, make a portfolio by writing blog posts about what you’ve learned, making a GitHub repository with your lab setups, and keeping track of your progress. When I interview people, I like it better when they have a well-documented home lab than when they have a lot of certifications. It shows that you can take the initiative, use what you know, and talk to people.

One project that really stood out to me was when a candidate made a full network diagram of their home lab, wrote down every configuration choice they made, and made troubleshooting guides for common problems. They only had one certification, but their portfolio showed that they really understood and could do things. They got the job over people who had more certifications but less experience that could be shown.

Making connections while you learn gives you more chances. Sign up for both online and in-person certification study groups. Go to user groups for the technology you want to learn. Join online forums and help people figure things out. The people you meet while studying can help you get a job. I got my first three IT jobs through connections I made in study groups, not by applying for jobs. My classmates knew what I could do and told their companies about me when jobs opened up.

Use what you learn right away to make it stick. Even if it’s not your main job, look for ways to use your new skills in your current role. Help out with IT projects, offer to write down how things work, and make tools that fix real problems. I noticed that our company’s password policy was weak while I was studying for Security+. I came up with a plan using Security+ ideas, showed it to management, and oversaw the work. The project was more important in later interviews than the certification itself.

Make your own goals and tasks. Make a home lab that looks like a business setting. Take things apart and put them back together. Use the technologies you’re learning about. Don’t just read about VLANs; set them up when you learn about them. When learning about security, set up a firewall and stop traffic. This hands-on experience turns what you know in theory into skills that employers want.

Study Tips That Really Work

Over the years, I’ve come up with and improved study methods that always help me pass my certification exams. The most important thing is to know that everyone learns in their own way, but some things are true for everyone. First, make a promise to study every day instead of for long periods of time. Every day for thirty minutes is better than once a week for five hours. Your brain needs time to sort through and remember what you’ve learned. I studied for the CCNA while working full-time by getting up an hour early every day. That steady routine helped me succeed on the first try.

Use more than one learning tool to help you remember things. Read the official cert guide, watch video courses, and do labs with your hands. Different ways of explaining things can help them make sense. When I was studying for Security+, I had a hard time with cryptography until I found a YouTube channel that explained it in a different way than my book. I finally understood the difference between symmetric and asymmetric encryption. Even if a resource is highly recommended, don’t only use it.

Practice tests are helpful, but you need to use them the right way. Don’t just learn the answers; learn why each one is right or wrong. If you get a question wrong, take the time to learn everything you can about the subject before moving on. I keep a journal of mistakes where I write down every practice question I get wrong, why I got it wrong, and what I learned. This focused review makes sure I don’t make the same mistakes on the real test.

Teach others what you know. Join online groups and help people with their questions. Make a blog for your studies. Talk to your non-technical friends about ideas. Teaching makes you really understand the material instead of just knowing it. I volunteered to teach my team basic Linux commands when I was getting ready for Linux+. Getting ready for those lessons helped me remember what I had learned better than reading could have.

How to Grow Your IT Career Beyond Certifications

Certifications can help you get ahead, but what you do after you get them is what will really help you succeed in the long run. Get a reputation for being reliable and good at solving problems. Be the one who follows through, writes down solutions, and helps others do well. You get hired because of your technical skills, and you get promoted because of your professional skills. I’ve seen great engineers get stuck because they couldn’t work with others, while less technical professionals moved up because they were great at working with others.

Keep learning and being curious even when you don’t have any certifications. Technology changes quickly, and what you knew yesterday is no longer useful today. Read tech blogs, listen to podcasts, and go to webinars. I spend at least an hour a week learning about new technologies, not for any specific certification but to stay up to date. This habit of always learning has helped me spot trends early and put myself in a good position.

Along with technical skills, learn how to run a business. Learn how technology can help you reach your business goals. Instead of just talking about technical details, learn to talk about ROI, efficiency gains, and risk reduction. The best IT workers I know can explain complicated technical choices in terms of business. They get budgets approved, run important projects, and move up the ranks into leadership roles because they can connect the technical and business sides of things.

Get a mentor and then be one yourself. Look for professionals who have been in your shoes and can help you make career choices. Join professional groups, go to conferences, and take part in online communities. As you get better at your job, help new people. Teaching others helps you remember what you know and expand your professional network. As both a mentor and a mentee, I have had some of the best professional relationships start with mentoring.

Last Thoughts: Your Path to Certification

I can tell you that certifications opened doors I didn’t know existed after working in IT for fifteen years. They made me learn in a structured way, showed employers that I knew what I was talking about, and gave me the confidence to solve hard problems. But they’re not magic bullets; they’re tools. The best IT professionals see certifications as steps along the way, not as goals.

Start with one certification that will help you reach your short-term goals. CompTIA A+ is the most common certification for beginners. It gives everything else a solid base to build on. After that, let your interests and chances lead you. Don’t try to get every certification. Instead, get experience and let certifications prove what you’ve learned. Having both certified knowledge and real-world experience gives your career unstoppable momentum.

Keep in mind that your career in IT is a long race, not a short one. The world of technology will change a lot during your career. The technologies you learn today may be out of date in five years, but the problem-solving skills, ability to learn, and professional network you build will help you throughout your career. Don’t just get certified; work on becoming really good at what you do. Get better at both your technical skills and your professional skills.

Pick certifications that help you reach your long-term goals while also giving you value right away. Find out what employers really want by looking into the job market in your area and then making sure your certification strategy matches. And don’t forget that every expert was once a beginner with a study guide and a lot of willpower. It doesn’t matter where you start; what matters is how committed you are to always getting better and using what you learn.

In the IT field, people who combine certified knowledge with real-world experience, professional skills with technical knowledge, and ongoing learning with practical application are the most successful. Today is the day you start your certification journey, but keep in mind that this is just the beginning. The real adventure is using what you know to solve problems, come up with new ideas, and help both your career and the organizations you work for move forward.

Can I Get Into IT Without a Degree?

 

Can I Get Into IT Without a Degree? The Complete Guide to Alternative Paths

The short answer is yes, you can absolutely build a successful IT career without a traditional four-year degree. The tech industry increasingly values skills, certifications, and demonstrable experience over formal education credentials. Major companies like Google, Apple, IBM, and Tesla have publicly removed degree requirements from many of their IT positions, signaling a fundamental shift in how the industry evaluates talent. This comprehensive guide breaks down the realistic paths into IT without a degree, what employers actually look for, and how to position yourself for success in a competitive but opportunity rich field.

The Current State of IT Hiring Without Degrees

The IT industry faces a significant talent shortage, with millions of positions going unfilled globally. According to recent labor statistics, approximately 50% of IT professionals currently working don’t hold a computer science degree, and about 30% don’t have any four-year degree at all.

This shift isn’t about lowering standards. It’s about recognizing that traditional education doesn’t have a monopoly on producing capable IT professionals. Companies care about one thing: can you do the job? If you can demonstrate the skills, knowledge, and work ethic needed, the lack of a degree becomes less relevant.

However, being realistic is important. While many paths exist into IT without a degree, you’ll face additional scrutiny. You need to prove your capabilities more thoroughly than candidates with formal credentials. That means building a stronger portfolio, earning recognized certifications, and often starting in entry level positions to establish your track record.

The key advantage of entering IT without a degree is time and cost savings. While others spend four years and potentially six figures on education, you can be gaining real work experience and building practical skills. The disadvantage is that you must be more intentional and strategic about your learning path.

What Employers Actually Look For

When hiring managers evaluate candidates without degrees, they focus on specific indicators that demonstrate capability and commitment. Understanding these priorities helps you position yourself effectively.

Relevant Certifications

Industry certifications serve as proof of knowledge and competency. They provide standardized validation that you understand specific technologies or methodologies. For someone without a degree, certifications become even more critical as they offer objective third party verification of your skills.

The most valuable entry level certifications include CompTIA A+ for foundational IT support skills, which demonstrates you can troubleshoot hardware, software, networking, and security issues. The CompTIA Network+ validates networking knowledge essential for infrastructure roles. For security focused paths, the CompTIA Security+ certification opens doors to cybersecurity positions.

Cloud certifications have become increasingly valuable. The AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner or Microsoft Azure Fundamentals provide foundational cloud knowledge that many organizations now require. These certifications typically take 2 to 4 months of focused study and cost between $200 and $400 per exam.

Demonstrable Experience

Experience matters more than credentials for many IT roles. The challenge without a degree is getting that first opportunity. Smart candidates create their own experience through various means.

Build personal projects that showcase your abilities. Set up a home lab where you configure networks, deploy servers, or experiment with security tools. Document everything on a blog or YouTube channel. This demonstrates initiative, technical competence, and communication skills simultaneously.

Contribute to open source projects on GitHub. Even small contributions like documentation improvements, bug reports, or minor code fixes show you can work with real codebases and collaborate with development teams. Many hiring managers review GitHub profiles as part of their evaluation process.

Volunteer your IT skills for nonprofits, small businesses, friends, or family. Fix computers, set up networks, build websites, or provide technical support. Every problem you solve adds to your experience portfolio and generates potential references who can vouch for your abilities.

Portfolio and Documentation

A strong portfolio compensates for the lack of formal education by providing tangible proof of your capabilities. Your portfolio should include detailed documentation of projects you’ve completed, problems you’ve solved, and systems you’ve built or maintained.

Create case studies for significant projects. Describe the challenge, your approach, the technologies used, obstacles encountered, and the final outcome. Include screenshots, diagrams, or videos demonstrating the working solution. This level of documentation shows professional maturity and attention to detail.

Maintain a technical blog where you share what you’re learning, explain complex concepts in simple terms, or provide tutorials. Writing clarifies your thinking and demonstrates communication skills that are crucial for IT roles. Plus, it makes you discoverable to potential employers searching for specific technical topics.

Soft Skills and Professional Attributes

Technical skills get you in the door, but soft skills determine your success and advancement. Without a degree to validate your preparation, these become even more critical.

Problem Solving Mindset: IT is fundamentally about solving problems. Demonstrate your ability to break down complex issues, research solutions, and implement fixes systematically.

Communication Skills: You’ll need to explain technical concepts to non-technical stakeholders, document your work clearly, and collaborate with diverse teams.

Continuous Learning: Technology evolves rapidly. Show that you can learn independently, adapt to new tools, and stay current with industry trends.

Customer Service Orientation: IT exists to serve business needs. Understanding user perspectives and providing helpful support opens doors, especially in entry level roles.

Project Management: Even junior roles benefit from understanding how to plan tasks, meet deadlines, and coordinate with others effectively.

Building Your Certification Path

While you may not pursue a traditional degree, earning industry recognized certifications is the most effective way to establish credibility and open doors in IT. Certifications validate your knowledge to employers through standardized, rigorous exams and provide structured learning paths that ensure comprehensive coverage of essential topics.

The most direct and credible path into IT without a degree is building a strategic certification roadmap. These credentials carry significant weight with employers because they prove you have specific, current skills that directly apply to the job. Unlike a general degree, certifications demonstrate focused expertise in areas that matter most to hiring managers.

The beauty of the certification path is that it’s purely merit based. It doesn’t matter where you learned the material or how long it took you. If you can pass the exam, you’ve proven your competency. Many professionals without degrees have built impressive careers by systematically earning certifications that demonstrate increasing levels of expertise.

Start with foundational certifications that establish your baseline IT knowledge. CompTIA’s foundational trio of A+, Network+, and Security+ build progressively and prepare you for help desk, networking, or security roles. These three certifications are widely recognized and respected across the industry, opening doors to entry level positions where you can gain practical experience.

Cloud certifications from AWS, Microsoft Azure, or Google Cloud Platform demonstrate modern infrastructure skills that are in massive demand. Start with foundational certifications like AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner or Azure Fundamentals, then pursue associate level credentials as you gain experience. These certifications typically require 100 to 200 hours of study and validate knowledge that organizations desperately need as they migrate to cloud environments.

Specialized certifications like Cisco’s CCNA for networking, CompTIA’s Linux+ for system administration, or various cybersecurity credentials position you for specific career paths. Choose certifications aligned with your target roles rather than collecting credentials randomly. Each certification should either strengthen your foundation or advance you toward specialization in a specific area.

Once you have your foundation, pursue advanced certifications aligned with your career direction. For cybersecurity careers, consider the CompTIA CySA+ or eventually the CISSP once you have the required experience. For cloud architects, AWS Solutions Architect Professional or Azure Solutions Architect Expert demonstrate advanced capabilities that command premium salaries.

The strategic advantage of certifications is their cumulative credibility. Each certification you earn builds on previous ones, creating a clear narrative of continuous learning and increasing expertise. Employers can see exactly what you know and trust that you’ve been tested on it. This often matters more than a degree that might have included many non technical courses with varying levels of rigor.

Creating Your Certification Roadmap: Map out a logical progression of certifications that build toward your career goal. Don’t collect random credentials. Each certification should either strengthen your foundation or advance you toward specialization in a specific area.

Budget Your Time and Money: Quality certification preparation requires investment. Budget 100 to 300 hours of study time per certification depending on complexity. Exam fees typically range from $200 to $500, with study materials adding another $100 to $300.

Use Structured Training: While self study is possible, structured training programs significantly improve pass rates and learning efficiency. Instructor led bootcamps condense months of self study into intensive weeks with expert guidance, hands on labs, and proven curricula.

Maintain Your Credentials: Most certifications require continuing education to remain valid. This ongoing learning keeps your skills current and demonstrates to employers that you’re committed to staying relevant in a rapidly evolving field.

The certification path requires discipline and financial investment, but it’s far less expensive and time consuming than a four year degree. More importantly, certifications signal to employers that you have current, practical knowledge rather than theoretical understanding from coursework that might be years out of date. In IT, where technologies evolve constantly, this currency of knowledge matters enormously.

Breaking Into Your First IT Role

Landing your first IT position without a degree requires strategic positioning and often creative approaches. You’re competing against candidates with formal credentials, so you need to demonstrate value in other ways.

Entry Level Positions That Don’t Require Degrees

These roles typically hire based on demonstrated ability rather than formal education.

Position Title Typical Requirements Key Skills to Highlight Average Starting Salary (USD)
Help Desk Technician CompTIA A+, customer service experience Troubleshooting, communication, patience, ticketing systems $40,000 to $50,000
Junior Network Technician Network+ or CCNA, basic networking knowledge Network configuration, cable management, documentation, basic security $45,000 to $55,000
IT Support Specialist A+ certification, problem solving abilities Hardware/software support, Active Directory, user account management $42,000 to $52,000
Junior Systems Administrator Linux+ or Windows Server knowledge, scripting basics System maintenance, backup procedures, basic automation, monitoring $50,000 to $60,000
Junior Web Developer Portfolio of projects, HTML/CSS/JavaScript proficiency Front end development, responsive design, version control, problem solving $50,000 to $65,000
QA Tester Attention to detail, basic technical knowledge Test case creation, bug documentation, regression testing, communication $45,000 to $55,000

Table 1: Entry Level IT Positions Accessible Without a Degree

Building Your Professional Network

Networking becomes even more important when you lack traditional credentials. Many IT positions are filled through referrals before they’re ever publicly posted. Building relationships with people already in the industry creates opportunities that wouldn’t otherwise exist.

Join local tech meetups and user groups where you can meet professionals, learn about opportunities, and demonstrate your knowledge through participation. Attend virtual conferences and webinars, engaging in chat discussions and following up with speakers and attendees on LinkedIn. Participate in online communities by answering questions on Stack Overflow, contributing to Reddit discussions, and helping others in Discord servers. Volunteer for tech related causes like teaching basic computer skills, helping nonprofits with IT needs, or contributing to civic tech projects. Consider finding a mentor through formal programs or by reaching out to professionals whose careers you admire.

Don’t underestimate informational interviews. Reach out to people working in roles you aspire to and ask for 15 to 20 minutes of their time to learn about their career path. Most professionals are willing to help if you’re respectful of their time and genuinely interested in learning. These conversations often lead to job referrals or valuable advice about breaking into the field.

Crafting Your Resume and Applications

Your resume needs to compensate for the lack of formal education by emphasizing relevant experience, certifications, and projects. Structure it to highlight what you can do rather than where you learned it.

Lead with a strong summary that positions you as a capable professional who happens to have taken a non-traditional path. Focus on your skills, certifications, and what value you bring to potential employers. Avoid apologetic language about not having a degree.

Create a detailed skills section organized by category like Operating Systems, Networking, Cloud Platforms, Programming Languages, and Tools. Only include technologies you genuinely understand and could discuss in an interview.

List your certifications prominently, including the certifying body, date earned, and any relevant specializations. If you’re currently pursuing certifications, you can list them as in progress with expected completion dates.

Include a projects section showcasing your best work. For each project, describe what you built, what technologies you used, what problems you solved, and what the outcomes were. Link to GitHub repositories, live demos, or detailed documentation where possible.

If you have any professional IT experience, even from volunteer work or freelancing, highlight it in your experience section using strong action verbs and quantifiable results. Configured, implemented, automated, troubleshot, and optimized are all powerful words that demonstrate hands on capability.

Interviewing Without a Degree

The degree question will likely come up in interviews. Be prepared with a confident, honest answer that positions your path as a strength rather than a deficit.

Example Response: While I haven’t pursued a traditional degree, I’ve invested that time in focused, practical learning through certifications and real world projects. This hands on approach has given me immediately applicable skills and the ability to contribute from day one. I’m committed to continuous learning and staying current with technology, as evidenced by my certifications and ongoing personal projects.

Frame your non-traditional path as deliberate choice rather than circumstance. Emphasize the practical skills you’ve gained and your ability to learn independently. Then quickly pivot to discussing what you can do for the employer.

Technical interviews are your chance to shine. Without a degree to validate your knowledge, you need to excel at demonstrating your abilities through practical assessments. Practice common interview scenarios like troubleshooting exercises, system design questions, or coding challenges depending on your target role.

Use resources like LeetCode for software engineering interviews, or practice help desk scenarios with friends to build confidence. The more comfortable you are discussing technical topics and working through problems, the less your lack of degree matters.

Prepare thoroughly for every interview. Research the company’s technology stack, understand their business challenges, and be ready to discuss how your skills address their specific needs. Build a brag book with documentation of projects, certifications, and achievements. Prepare detailed stories using the STAR method, which stands for Situation, Task, Action, Result, for behavioral questions. Be ready for technical assessments by setting up a clean development environment and practicing live coding. Research the company thoroughly and prepare thoughtful questions showing your genuine interest.

Long Term Career Growth Without a Degree

Getting your first IT job without a degree is just the beginning. Building a successful long term career requires ongoing skill development, strategic positioning, and sometimes creative approaches to advancement.

Advancing Through Specialization

As you gain experience, developing deep expertise in specific areas becomes increasingly valuable. Specialists often command higher salaries and face less competition than generalists, particularly in fields where demonstrated expertise matters more than credentials.

Consider specializing in high demand areas like cloud architecture, cybersecurity, DevOps, data engineering, or AI/ML operations. These fields value practical experience and advanced certifications, with many professionals succeeding without traditional degrees.

Pursue advanced certifications as you specialize. A CISSP for security professionals, AWS Solutions Architect Professional for cloud specialists, or Certified Kubernetes Administrator for container orchestration experts can significantly boost your career prospects and earning potential.

Building Your Personal Brand

Without a prestigious university name on your resume, your personal brand becomes more important. Establish yourself as a knowledgeable professional through consistent public contributions to the field.

Maintain an active technical blog sharing insights, tutorials, and lessons learned. Speak at local meetups or user groups about your areas of expertise. Contribute to open source projects, especially those used by potential employers. Create helpful content on YouTube, LinkedIn, or Twitter demonstrating your knowledge and helping others solve problems.

These activities serve multiple purposes. They solidify your own understanding through teaching others, increase your visibility to potential employers and clients, demonstrate your expertise in concrete ways, and build a network of professional relationships that can lead to opportunities.

Considering Degree Completion Later

Some professionals eventually pursue degrees after establishing their IT careers. This approach offers several advantages. You have clearer career direction so you can choose programs that align with your goals. You may have employer tuition assistance to offset costs. Your practical experience makes academic concepts more meaningful and applicable. Part time or online programs let you continue working while studying.

However, once you have several years of experience and strong credentials, a degree becomes less important for most IT roles. Many professionals find that advanced certifications, specialized training, or building a strong track record provide better return on investment than completing a degree at that stage.

The exception might be if you want to transition into management, academic roles, or certain government positions where degrees remain more strongly preferred. Evaluate your specific career goals and whether a degree would meaningfully advance them before committing time and money.

Common Challenges and How to Overcome Them

Being honest about the obstacles helps you prepare for them rather than being blindsided. Here are the most common challenges you’ll face and practical strategies for addressing them.

Automated Resume Screening

Many companies use applicant tracking systems that filter resumes based on keywords, including educational requirements. Your resume might get rejected automatically before a human ever sees it.

Strategy: Apply through referrals whenever possible to bypass automated systems. Network aggressively to get your resume directly to hiring managers. Target smaller companies and startups that are less likely to use strict automated filtering. Focus on companies that explicitly state they don’t require degrees. Use LinkedIn to directly message recruiters and hiring managers about positions.

Imposter Syndrome

Without formal validation of your knowledge through a degree program, you might doubt your capabilities even when you’re performing well.

Strategy: Focus on objective measures of competence like certifications passed, projects completed, and problems solved. Keep a success journal documenting wins and positive feedback. Remember that everyone in IT deals with imposter syndrome regardless of education. Your practical experience is just as valid as theoretical knowledge. Connect with other self taught professionals who understand your journey.

Knowledge Gaps

Self directed learning can leave gaps in foundational knowledge that degree programs systematically cover.

Strategy: Periodically assess your knowledge against job descriptions for roles you want. Identify gaps and create focused learning plans to address them. Follow comprehensive curricula from sources like university syllabi or professional certification paths rather than random tutorials. Don’t be afraid to revisit fundamentals even after you’ve started working. Strong foundations become increasingly important as you advance.

Limited Entry Level Opportunities

Some companies maintain strict degree requirements for all positions, limiting your options especially when starting out.

Strategy: Be willing to start with contract, freelance, or part time work to build experience. Consider roles adjacent to IT like technical support, data entry, or office IT that have lower barriers to entry but provide exposure to technical environments. Look at managed service providers and IT consulting firms that often have more flexible hiring practices. Once you have solid experience, more doors open regardless of education.

The Reality Check

Building an IT career without a degree is absolutely possible, but it requires more initiative, persistence, and strategic thinking than following the traditional path. You need to be comfortable with continuous self improvement, rejection, and proving yourself repeatedly. The good news is that IT rewards results. Once you demonstrate you can do the work, your lack of formal education becomes increasingly irrelevant. Focus on building undeniable competence through certifications, projects, and experience, and opportunities will follow.

 

How OSINT Techniques Saved My Friend From a €90 Disney Squishmallow Scam

Sometimes the best cybersecurity lessons come from the most unexpected places. Last week, I was deep in a penetration testing report at my favorite Copenhagen café, my two dogs curled up under the table, when my friend Emma burst through the door looking absolutely frantic. She’d been trying to buy Disney Squishmallows for her goddaughter’s birthday and had already fallen for two different scams. As someone who spends their days hunting vulnerabilities and running phishing simulations, I couldn’t believe how sophisticated these counterfeit operations had become.

What started as a quick favor – “Nora, you’re good with computers, can you check if this site is legit?” – turned into a masterclass in applying OSINT techniques to e-commerce. By the end of that afternoon, I’d mapped out an entire counterfeit network spanning 47 domains, discovered a sophisticated SEO poisoning campaign, and helped Emma understand why her browser’s autofill had just handed her credit card details to criminals in Vietnam.

Here’s the thing: the same skills we use to identify advanced persistent threats and investigate security breaches are exactly what you need to navigate the minefield of online shopping in 2024. And Disney Squishmallows? They’ve become the perfect case study for understanding modern e-commerce fraud.

The Infrastructure Behind the Scam

When Emma showed me the site she’d almost purchased from, my security instincts immediately kicked in. Using Shodan, I discovered the server was hosting 23 other “official Disney stores,” all using the same nginx configuration, same SSL certificate provider, and identical checkout process. The infrastructure fingerprinting revealed they were all running on a $5/month DigitalOcean droplet – not exactly what you’d expect from Disney’s official merchandise partners.

A quick WHOIS lookup using DNSDumpster showed the domain had been registered just 72 hours earlier through a privacy protection service in Panama. The registrant had used sequential naming patterns (disney-squishmallow-store1.com, disney-squishmallow-store2.com, etc.) – a classic indicator of bulk domain registration for fraudulent purposes. When I cross-referenced the IP address with AbuseIPDB, it had been flagged 47 times in the past month for various scams.

Reverse Engineering the Supply Chain Attack

Disney Squishmallows are manufactured exclusively by Kellytoy (Jazwares) under official license. Understanding this supply chain is crucial for authentication. Using BuiltWith, I analyzed the technology stack of legitimate retailers versus the scam sites. Real retailers like Target, Walmart, and ShopDisney use enterprise-grade e-commerce platforms with Akamai CDN, multiple payment gateways, and sophisticated inventory management systems.

The counterfeit sites? They were all running identical WooCommerce installations with the same vulnerable plugins (I ran a quick WPScan and found three critical vulnerabilities). The payment processing was particularly interesting – they used stripe-like checkout forms that actually sent data to a third-party processor in Southeast Asia, completely bypassing Stripe’s actual infrastructure.

Technical Red Flags I Found:

• SSL certificates from Let’s Encrypt (not inherently bad, but unusual for major retailers)

• JavaScript obfuscation hiding credential harvesting functions

• Modified robots.txt blocking security scanners specifically

• Fake Google Analytics tags that were actually keyloggers

• Image hotlinking from legitimate Disney sites to appear authentic

The SEO Poisoning Campaign

Here’s where it gets interesting from a technical perspective. These scammers weren’t just setting up fake stores – they were running a sophisticated SEO poisoning campaign. Using Ahrefs and Moz, I discovered they’d built a network of 200+ backlinks from compromised WordPress sites, all pointing to their fake stores with anchor text like “authentic Disney Squishmallows Denmark” and “buy real Mickey Squishmallow Europe.”

They were specifically targeting European searchers, knowing we have limited access to official US retailers. The campaign used cloaking techniques – showing different content to Google’s crawlers than to regular visitors. When Googlebot visited, it saw legitimate-looking product pages. When real users arrived, JavaScript redirects sent them through three different domains before landing on the scam checkout page.

Building a Python Script to Verify Sellers

Being a tech nerd, I couldn’t help but automate the verification process. I built a Python script that combines multiple APIs to verify seller legitimacy. It checks domain age via WHOIS, SSL certificate details, presence on ScamAdviser and Trustpilot, malware scanning through VirusTotal API, and reverse image searches to detect stolen product photos.

The script also uses Selenium to check for specific JavaScript behaviors that indicate credential harvesting. One particularly clever detection method: measuring the time between form field focus and data transmission. Legitimate sites only send data on form submission. These scam sites were exfiltrating keystrokes in real-time to a Firebase database.

Pro Tip: I’ve open-sourced a simplified version of this verification script on GitHub. It’s particularly useful for checking any e-commerce site, not just Squishmallow sellers. The security community has already contributed improvements, including checks for typosquatting domains and payment processor verification.

The European Challenge: Finding Legitimate Sources

Living in Denmark adds complexity to finding authentic Disney Squishmallows. After extensive research and verification, here are the legitimate sources available to European buyers:

Amazon.de: Only when “Ships from and sold by Amazon” is clearly stated. Use CamelCamelCamel to track price history – authentic Disney Squishmallows rarely drop below €15.

Disney Store Europe: Limited selection but guaranteed authentic. They use Akamai CDN and have proper PCI compliance certificates.

Smyths Toys: UK/Ireland based but ships to EU. Verify their SSL certificate shows “Smyths Toys Superstores Ltd.”

Very.co.uk: Ships internationally, but watch the shipping costs. Their checkout process uses Klarna, which offers buyer protection.

Local toy stores: Top-Toy (Nordic chain) occasionally gets shipments. Call ahead – they don’t always update online inventory.

The Authentication Deep Dive

Once Emma finally got her authentic Squishmallows from Walmart.com (shipped to a package forwarding service), we compared them to photos from the scam sites. The differences were subtle but crucial – exactly like comparing legitimate software to trojaned versions.

Authentic Disney Squishmallows have specific security features that remind me of hardware attestation. The tags have a unique SKU format that follows Kellytoy’s pattern (always starts with specific prefixes for Disney items). The stitching uses a particular thread weight that’s consistent across all genuine products. Even the stuffing has a specific density that counterfeiters rarely match – it’s like checking if RAM chips are genuine by their timing specifications.

The Incident Response Protocol

When Emma realized she’d already entered her credit card details on one of the scam sites, we had to act fast. Here’s the incident response protocol I walked her through – the same one I’d use for a corporate data breach:

First, immediate containment: Contact her bank’s fraud department and freeze the card. Then, change all passwords that might have been captured by keyloggers, especially if she reused any. We ran HaveIBeenPwned checks on her email addresses and set up breach monitoring through Firefox Monitor.

For documentation, we screenshotted everything using Screenshot API for evidence, saved all email confirmations, and reported the domains to Google Safe Browsing and IC3. The Danish police cybercrime unit was surprisingly interested when I showed them the scope of the operation.

Building a Community Defense Network

The most interesting part came when I posted about this in the r/squishmallow subreddit. Within hours, collectors from around the world were sharing similar experiences. We ended up creating a crowd-sourced threat intelligence network specifically for Squishmallow fraud.

Using Maltego, I mapped the relationships between scam domains, payment processors, and hosting providers. The visualization revealed three distinct threat actor groups, each with different tactics but sharing infrastructure. One group was particularly sophisticated, using Cloudflare Workers to dynamically generate convincing product pages based on real-time scraping of legitimate sites.

Community Impact: Our impromptu threat intelligence network has now identified and reported over 300 fraudulent Disney Squishmallow sites. Namecheap and GoDaddy have started proactively suspending domains matching our identified patterns. It’s like a grassroots version of the Anti-Phishing Working Group, but for plush toys.

The Lessons for IT Professionals

This whole experience reinforced something I’ve been thinking about during my café-hopping work sessions across Denmark: cybersecurity isn’t just about protecting corporate assets anymore. The same threat actors using sophisticated techniques for ransomware are applying those skills to e-commerce fraud.

The Disney Squishmallow scams use techniques straight out of the APT playbook: infrastructure reuse across campaigns, living-off-the-land tactics (using legitimate services like Cloudflare), social engineering through fake scarcity, and multi-stage payload delivery (the checkout process).

As IT professionals, we need to share these skills beyond the enterprise. Teaching friends and family to run basic OSINT checks before entering payment information online is becoming as important as teaching them about password managers. The technical literacy gap is being exploited, and we’re uniquely positioned to help bridge it.

The Happy Ending (And Your Cheat Sheet)

Emma’s goddaughter got her Mickey and Minnie Squishmallows for her birthday, sourced legitimately from Target via a package forwarding service. The joy on that kid’s face in the photos made all the technical investigation worth it. But more importantly, Emma now knows how to verify online sellers herself.

Here’s your technical cheat sheet for buying authentic Disney Squishmallows (or really, anything online):

Quick Verification Steps:

1. WHOIS lookup – Domain should be >1 year old for established retailers

2. SSL certificate – Check organization name matches the company

3. BuiltWith check – Look for enterprise e-commerce platforms

4. Reverse image search product photos – Scammers steal from real sites

5. Check Trustpilot and Reddit – Real customers complain publicly

6. Verify payment processor – Should be recognizable (PayPal, Stripe, etc.)

Next week, I’m presenting this case study at a security conference here in Copenhagen. Who would have thought that Disney Squishmallows would become my most relatable example of practical OSINT application? But honestly, if explaining cross-site scripting through the lens of counterfeit plush toys gets people to understand web security, then my dogs and I will keep investigating from cafés across Europe.

The real lesson? Every online purchase is an opportunity to practice good security hygiene. Whether you’re buying enterprise software or Disney Squishmallows, the verification principles remain the same: trust but verify, use OSINT tools, and when in doubt, walk away. And if you’re in Europe looking for authentic Disney Squishmallows, stick to Amazon.de (sold by Amazon), Disney Store Europe, or use a forwarding service from US retailers like Target or Walmart. Your credit card and your gift recipients will thank you.

Which ISACA Certifications Actually Matter in Banking?

After years working at ISACA and hearing from hundreds of banking professionals about their certification journeys, the patterns are clear: some certifications transform careers, others are expensive wallpaper. Banking professionals consistently tell me the same stories: they thought more certifications meant better careers, until they realized hiring managers only care about specific ones.

Here’s the unfiltered truth about ISACA certifications in banking, based on what Chicago’s banking professionals have shared with me over the years. These aren’t theoretical recommendations; these are real experiences from people working at JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, BMO Harris, and dozens of other institutions.

Why ISACA Matters in Banking

Banking professionals constantly tell me that ISACA certifications are regulatory currency. It’s not just about the knowledge: it’s about speaking the same language as regulators. When the OCC, Fed, or FDIC’s IT examination procedures come into play, they report that having ISACA-certified staff shows regulators you’re serious about governance and risk management. One risk manager called it “regulatory theater,” but it’s theater that keeps the examiners happy.

But here’s what banking professionals wish someone had told them earlier: not all ISACA certs are created equal in banking. Some will fast-track careers. Others, they tell me, are just expensive resume padding.

The Heavy Hitters: Certifications That Actually Pay

CRISC (Certified in Risk and Information Systems Control)

The Reality: Banking professionals unanimously call this the golden ticket right now. Every bank is obsessed with risk management, especially after SVB and the regional banking crisis. They tell me CRISC speaks directly to what keeps executives up at night: cyber risk, operational risk, third-party risk.

Who Should Get It: Banking professionals say anyone in risk management, information security, or trying to move into those areas needs this. Multiple audit professionals reported using CRISC as their bridge to transition from audit to the second line of defense.

Salary Impact: Chicago banking professionals report CRISC adds $15-25K to base salaries. Risk managers tell me they’re pulling $130-180K with CRISC at major banks, versus $110-150K without it.

CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor)

The Reality: Banking professionals call this the OG of ISACA certs. Every bank has a massive audit function, and they consistently report that CISA is table stakes for senior audit roles. It’s not sexy, but auditors tell me it provides steady employment with good pay.

Who Should Get It: Internal auditors, external auditors moving to banking, or anyone who wants job security. Banking professionals emphasize that audit isn’t going anywhere because regulators make sure of that.

The Catch: Multiple banking professionals warn that CISA can pigeonhole you into audit. They’ve seen talented people get stuck because they’re “too valuable” in audit to promote elsewhere. Their advice: have an exit strategy.

CISM (Certified Information Security Manager)

The Reality: Security leaders in banking consistently tell me: if you want to lead security teams, you need CISM. Period. They report it’s less technical than CISSP but more focused on governance and management, exactly what banks want from security leaders.

Who Should Get It: Banking professionals say security analysts ready to move into management need this, as do current managers who need credibility with the C-suite.

The Sweet Spot: Multiple banking professionals report that CISM + MBA is the killer combo for the Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) track. They’ve shared stories of colleagues who made VP at major banks within two years of getting this combination.

The Situational Players: Sometimes Worth It

CGEIT (Certified in the Governance of Enterprise IT)

Banking professionals describe this as being for “governance nerds” who want to work with boards and executive committees. Super niche, but those on that path tell me it’s valuable. IT strategy professionals report it’s useful for enterprise architecture or Chief Data Officer roles. Technical staff consistently say it’s not useful for hands-on roles.

CDPSE (Certified Data Privacy Solutions Engineer)

With CCPA, GDPR, and whatever privacy regulation comes next, banking professionals acknowledge banks need privacy expertise. But they tell me this cert is still finding its place. Most banking professionals advise waiting. They report that banks haven’t figured out if they prefer CDPSE or IAPP certifications.

The Skip List: Not Worth It in Banking

CSX Certifications

Banking professionals are blunt about CSX: banks don’t care. They consistently report that banks prefer other specialized certifications for hands-on technical roles. One security manager told me, “CSX is solving a problem banks don’t have.”

CET (Certified in Emerging Technology)

Banking professionals describe this as too broad and too shallow. They tell me banks want specialists, not generalists who know a little about AI, blockchain, and IoT. Their advice: get vendor-specific certifications in the actual technology you’re working with.

Experience Requirements: The Brutal Truth

ISACA says you need 3-5 years of experience for most certifications. Banking professionals shared this insight: while you can take the exam first and accumulate experience later within five years, they universally advise against this approach. They say a certification without experience is like having a driver’s license but never having driven. Hiring managers tell me they can spot it immediately.

The consensus is clear: certifications combined with relevant experience create credibility. Banking professionals emphasize that foundational certifications can help early-career professionals, but ISACA certifications carry the most weight when backed by practical experience in banking environments.

The Investment and Returns

Banking professionals consistently report significant salary increases after obtaining ISACA certifications. They tell me CISA typically adds $10-20K to base salaries, CRISC brings $15-25K increases, and CISM can mean $20-30K bumps. Risk managers with CRISC at major Chicago banks report earning $130-180K versus $110-150K without it.

The investment in professional ISACA training typically pays for itself within 3-6 months according to banking professionals. They emphasize that quality preparation matters more than cost-cutting when it comes to certification success.

Hidden Benefits Nobody Talks About

Banking professionals tell me ISACA certifications provide benefits beyond salary:

Mobility: They report ISACA certs transfer between banks. Your proprietary knowledge of Wells Fargo’s systems doesn’t.

Network: Banking professionals say Chicago ISACA chapter events are where deals get made and jobs get offered.

Credibility: Young professionals report certifications help bridge the experience gap when presenting to senior executives.

Consulting Options: Several professionals report CISA + CRISC opens doors to $150-200/hour consulting gigs with regional banks.

The Chicago Banking Scene

Banking professionals tell me certain Chicago institutions value ISACA certifications more than others:

Big Banks (JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America): They report ISACA is mandatory for senior roles

Regional Banks (BMO Harris, Fifth Third): Banking professionals say ISACA preferred but not required

Trading Firms (CME, Citadel): Traders tell me these firms don’t care about ISACA since they want technical skills

Consulting (PwC, Deloitte): Consultants report ISACA is currency, so the more, the better

The Bottom Line

Banking professionals consistently tell me that ISACA certifications are a game you have to play in banking, but you don’t have to play it stupidly. Their advice: be strategic. Pick certifications that align with your career path, not what looks impressive on LinkedIn.

The consensus from banking professionals is clear: if you’re in risk, get CRISC. If you’re in audit, get CISA. If you want to lead, get CISM. Skip the rest unless you have a specific reason.

Banking professionals emphasize: certifications get you in the door, but performance keeps you in the room. They’ve seen CISA-certified auditors who couldn’t audit their way out of a paper bag and uncertified risk managers who are absolute rockstars.

The message from Chicago’s banking community is unanimous: certifications are tools, not trophies. Use them to build the career you want in banking, not to impress people who don’t matter.

And banking professionals shared one last piece of advice: if your bank offers to pay for the certification, take it. Even if it’s CGEIT and you think you’ll never use it. They say free education is free education, and you never know when that random governance knowledge will make you the smartest person in a meeting.

Are you a banking professional with ISACA certification experience? What ROI have you seen? Reach out with your story since understanding real experiences helps everyone navigate the certification landscape better.

Why Healthcare IT Security Failures Keep Happening (And How to Actually Fix Them)

Last month, another major hospital system paid millions in ransom to regain access to their patient records. The week before that, a regional healthcare network discovered that attackers had been in their systems for six months. These aren’t outliers—they’re Tuesday in healthcare IT.

After two decades of working in healthcare technology, I’ve seen the same security mistakes repeated across hundreds of organizations. The frustrating part? Most breaches exploit known vulnerabilities that we’ve had solutions for since 2015. The problem isn’t that we don’t know what to do—it’s that healthcare’s unique constraints make doing it extraordinarily difficult.

The Perfect Storm: Why Healthcare is a Sitting Duck

Healthcare organizations face a convergence of factors that make them uniquely vulnerable to cyberattacks. Understanding these challenges is the first step toward building realistic security strategies.

The Legacy System Nightmare

That MRI machine in your radiology department? It’s probably running Windows XP. The lab equipment processing blood tests? Windows 7 if you’re lucky. These aren’t budget constraints—these are $2 million machines with 20-year lifespans that were FDA-certified with specific operating systems.

You can’t just “update” them. Any modification could void FDA certification, manufacturer warranties, or worse—introduce bugs that affect patient care. So they sit there, unpatched, connected to your network because doctors need the data they generate.

The Access Paradox

In most industries, you can lock down systems and require multiple authentication steps. In healthcare, seconds matter. When a trauma patient arrives, medical staff need immediate access to records, imaging, and lab systems. Every additional click or authentication step could literally cost lives.

I’ve watched security teams implement two-factor authentication only to have it disabled within weeks because it delayed emergency care. The challenge isn’t implementing security—it’s implementing security that doesn’t impede patient care.

The Data Gold Mine

A stolen credit card sells for $5 on the dark web. A complete medical record? Up to $1,000. Medical records contain everything criminals need for identity theft, insurance fraud, and targeted scams—social security numbers, addresses, family history, insurance information, and health conditions that can be exploited.

Unlike credit cards that can be cancelled, you can’t change your medical history or DNA sequence. This permanence makes healthcare data incredibly valuable to attackers.

How Healthcare Breaches Actually Happen

Most healthcare breaches follow a predictable pattern. They start with a phishing email—often targeting administrative staff who handle invoices and supplier communications. The malware enters through seemingly legitimate attachments, bypassing outdated antivirus systems.

Once inside, attackers spend weeks or months mapping the network, stealing credentials, and identifying critical systems. They locate backup servers, domain controllers, and vulnerable medical systems running on outdated operating systems. The actual ransomware deployment happens all at once—usually during off-hours when IT staff is minimal. Backups are encrypted first to prevent recovery, then production systems.

The result? Hospitals operating on paper charts, cancelled surgeries, diverted ambulances, and multi-million dollar ransom demands. The most frustrating part is that basic security measures could prevent most of these attacks—if those measures didn’t conflict with clinical operations.

The Practical Defense: What Actually Works

After years of trial and error, here are the security measures that actually stick in healthcare environments:

1. Network Segmentation That Makes Sense

Stop trying to secure everything equally. Create zones based on risk and accessibility needs:

Critical Care Zone: Life support, surgical systems. Air-gapped where possible, zero external access.

Clinical Zone: EMR, PACS, lab systems. Restricted access, heavy monitoring, clinical authentication.

Administrative Zone: Billing, scheduling, email. Standard corporate security controls.

DMZ: Patient portals, public websites. Assume compromise, no direct internal access.

The key is ensuring that a compromise in billing can’t reach the ICU ventilators. Use NIST framework guidelines but adapt them to healthcare’s reality.

2. Context-Aware Authentication

Instead of blanket two-factor authentication, implement smart authentication that considers context:

• Emergency department workstations: Badge tap or proximity authentication

• Remote access: Full MFA with biometrics

• Administrative functions: Time-delayed MFA (can wait 30 seconds)

• Break-glass accounts: Logged but immediate access for emergencies

One hospital I worked with reduced authentication-related delays by 85% while actually improving security by implementing role and location-based authentication rules.

3. Immutable Backup Strategy

Ransomware targets backups first. Your backup strategy needs to assume the backup servers will be compromised:

• 3-2-1-1 Rule: 3 copies, 2 different media types, 1 offsite, 1 immutable/air-gapped

• Test monthly: Actually restore systems, not just verify backup integrity

• Separate credentials: Backup systems use completely different authentication

• Legal hold feature: Use storage that supports write-once-read-many (WORM)

4. Medical Device Management

You can’t patch that ancient CT scanner, but you can isolate it:

• Create a medical device VLAN with no internet access

• Use jump boxes for vendor maintenance (never direct access)

• Deploy compensating controls (IDS/IPS specifically tuned for medical devices)

• Maintain an accurate inventory with criticality ratings

The Human Factor: Your Weakest and Strongest Link

Technology alone won’t save you. The billing clerk who clicked that malicious attachment? They weren’t stupid—they were doing their job in an environment where “urgent” is normal and suppliers constantly send documents.

Effective Security Training for Healthcare

Forget generic security training. Healthcare workers need healthcare-specific scenarios:

• Show real phishing emails targeting hospitals, not generic “Nigerian prince” examples

• Explain how a breach affects patient care, not just “company data”

• Role-specific training: What nurses face differs from what billing faces

• Make it short: 15-minute monthly sessions beat annual hour-long lectures

One client reduced successful phishing attacks by 75% by sending simulated phishing emails based on actual healthcare scenarios—fake CDC alerts, bogus medical supplier invoices, and compromised colleague accounts.

Incident Response: When (Not If) You Get Hit

Every healthcare organization needs an incident response plan that assumes the worst: total system compromise during a medical emergency.

The Downtime Procedures Nobody Wants to Think About

Paper charts ready: Current forms, downtime kits in every unit

Communication plan: How do you coordinate without email or phones?

Medication protocols: How do you verify dosages without the pharmacy system?

Lab results: Manual processes for critical tests

Triage decisions: Which systems get restored first? (Hint: not email)

Practice these procedures quarterly. The first time you discover your paper chart process doesn’t work shouldn’t be during a ransomware attack.

The Budget Reality Check

“We don’t have budget for security” is something I hear weekly. Here’s what I tell administrators: You’re going to spend the money either way. You can either spend it on prevention or on ransom, lawsuits, and HIPAA fines.

The average healthcare breach costs $10.93 million according to IBM’s 2023 report. That’s not including the immeasurable cost of delayed surgeries, diverted ambulances, and compromised patient care.

Where to Start with Limited Resources

If you can only do five things this year:

1. Implement email filtering and sandboxing ($30-50K/year for most hospitals)

2. Deploy EDR on all endpoints (Yes, it’s expensive. Ransomware is more expensive)

3. Segment your network (Time-intensive but minimal cash cost)

4. Fix your backups (Test restores monthly, implement immutability)

5. Train your people (Phishing simulations and role-specific training)

Looking Forward: AI, IoT, and Tomorrow’s Threats

The threat landscape is evolving faster than ever. AI-powered attacks can craft perfect phishing emails by analyzing your organization’s communication patterns. IoT medical devices are proliferating with minimal security oversight. Cloud adoption is accelerating without proper governance.

But here’s the thing: the fundamentals haven’t changed. Good security hygiene, network segmentation, reliable backups, and trained staff will protect you from 90% of attacks. The fancy AI-powered security tools are nice, but they’re useless if you’re still running unpatched Windows 2008 servers.

The Bottom Line

Healthcare IT security is hard—probably the hardest IT security challenge that exists. You’re protecting life-critical systems that can’t go down, using technology that can’t be updated, in an environment where seconds matter, against attackers who see you as the perfect target.

But it’s not impossible. Every incremental improvement makes your organization a harder target. You don’t need to be perfect—you need to be better than you were yesterday and harder to compromise than the hospital down the street.

Start with the basics. Segment your networks. Train your people. Test your backups. Build your security program with the understanding that clinical care comes first, but that good security enables good care.

Because at the end of the day, this isn’t about compliance or avoiding fines. It’s about ensuring that when someone’s parent has a heart attack at 3 AM, the systems needed to save their life are available, accurate, and uncompromised.

That’s what we’re really protecting.

What security challenges are you facing in your healthcare organization? What’s worked and what hasn’t? Let’s share knowledge—because in healthcare IT security, we’re all on the same team against the attackers.