Hello, you are using an old browser that's unsafe and no longer supported. Please consider updating your browser to a newer version, or downloading a modern browser.

Career Paths

Is Studying Cybersecurity Hard? An Honest Take From Someone Who Coaches Candidates Every Week

K
Ken Sahs Training Camp
Published
Read Time 17 min read
Is Studying Cybersecurity Hard? An Honest Take From Someone Who Coaches Candidates Every Week

Every week I talk to people who want to know if studying cybersecurity is going to wreck their nights and weekends for the next six months. They’ve heard horror stories. Someone’s cousin spent a year studying for CISSP and still failed. A coworker quit halfway through a Security+ course. The internet is full of forum posts about brutal exam questions and 70% fail rates on first attempts. So they call us before they spend a dollar, and the question is always the same. How hard is this actually going to be?

The honest answer is that studying cybersecurity is hard, but not in the way most people expect. Technical concepts on their own aren’t impossible. Plenty of people without IT backgrounds pass entry-level cybersecurity certifications every month. What makes it tough is the volume of material, the way exam questions are written, and the discipline required to actually sit down and study when you’ve got a full-time job and a life. Let’s break down what that really looks like in 2026.

Most people don’t fail cybersecurity exams because they aren’t smart enough. They fail because they underestimated the time commitment or studied the wrong material.


Is Studying Cybersecurity Actually Hard?

Yes, but it’s manageable hard, not impossible hard. Cybersecurity covers a lot of ground. You’re learning networking concepts, operating system internals, cryptography basics, risk management frameworks, regulatory requirements, and the names of about fifty different attack types. For someone brand new to IT, that volume can feel overwhelming in the first few weeks. If you’ve already got help desk or sysadmin experience under your belt, much of the foundational material will click faster because the basics are already in place. Worth knowing as motivation while you’re grinding: the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics projects 29% job growth for information security analysts from 2024 to 2034, with a median wage of $124,910 per their May 2024 data. The math works out in your favor if you finish what you start.

Here’s what I tell people on sales calls. If you can study consistently for 60 to 90 minutes a day over two or three months, CompTIA Security+ is well within reach. CISSP is a different animal and usually wants four to six months of focused work. None of this material is beyond most adults with reasonable reading comprehension and the willingness to sit down and grind. Where candidates trip up is treating it like a college class where you cram the week before. These exams punish that approach because the question writers specifically design scenarios that test whether you understand the material or just memorized definitions.

The other thing worth saying upfront is that not all cybersecurity studying is the same. Sitting for CISSP is a completely different experience from sitting for CompTIA A+ or PenTest+. The certs have different difficulty curves, different question formats, and the time requirements range from weeks to half a year. Lumping them together under “cybersecurity studying” makes the question harder to answer than it needs to be.

A reality check from the sales floor. About 70% of the candidates I talk to who fail their first attempt come back and tell me the same thing. They didn’t put in the hours they thought they did. They watched videos at 2x speed, told themselves they understood the material, and then sat down for the exam without ever really testing their knowledge. The studying part wasn’t the hard part for them. Being honest with themselves about whether they’d actually studied was.


How Many Hours Does Studying Cybersecurity Actually Take?

This is the question people ask me most often, and I appreciate it because it shows they’re thinking practically. Total study hours vary by certification, your starting knowledge, and how efficiently you study. The numbers below come from what I see in client outcomes, official guidance from certification bodies, and feedback from candidates who actually passed.

⏱️ Study Hours by Certification
SECURITY+

80 to 120 hours. The standard entry-level security certification. Most candidates spread this over 8 to 12 weeks. Someone with no IT background should plan for the upper end of that range.
CYSA+

100 to 150 hours. The intermediate analyst certification. Heavier on tooling, log analysis, and incident response than Security+.
CISM

120 to 180 hours. ISACA’s management-focused cert. Heavy on governance and risk concepts. Candidates with security experience typically need less time than those coming from pure technical backgrounds.
CISSP

150 to 250 hours. The big one. Eight domains, 700 pages of source material, and questions that frequently have two right answers where you have to pick the best one. Plan for four to six months minimum.
CRISC

120 to 150 hours. Risk-focused ISACA certification. People with audit or compliance experience tend to land near the bottom of that range.

These numbers assume focused study time. That means no phone, no Slack, no Netflix in the background. An hour of distracted studying isn’t an hour. It’s maybe twenty minutes of actual learning surrounded by forty minutes of pretending. The candidates who hit their target hours and still fail are usually the ones who counted distracted time as study time.

For working professionals, a realistic schedule is one hour on weeknights plus three to four hours on weekends. That gives you about 12 hours a week, which means a 100-hour study plan takes roughly 8 weeks. If you can only commit five hours a week, the same cert takes 20 weeks. Both work. Pretending you can finish in two weeks of weekend cramming doesn’t.


What Makes Cybersecurity Studying Hard for Most People

Five things trip up almost every candidate I work with, regardless of which cert they’re chasing. Recognizing these traps before you start is half the battle.

The Volume of Memorization

Cybersecurity exams expect you to know a lot of specific terms. Acronyms for protocols, names of attack types, layers of the OSI model, common ports and what runs on them, control families from frameworks like NIST 800-53, and the steps of various incident response models. Some of it is useful operational knowledge you’ll touch every day on the job. A fair chunk is trivia you’ll never use again after the exam, but you still have to know it cold to pass.

The candidates who struggle with this are usually trying to memorize without understanding. They make flashcards for the acronyms but never learn what the protocols actually do or why they matter. That works until the question stops asking “what is TLS” and starts asking “given this scenario, which protocol provides the best security guarantee for the requirement.” Now you need to understand the thing, not just recognize its name.

The Way Exam Questions Are Written

This is the biggest shock for people coming from college testing. Cybersecurity certifications, especially ISACA and ISC2 exams, often present questions where multiple answers are technically correct. The challenge is picking the BEST answer based on the framework’s perspective. Your real-world experience can actually work against you here because what you’d do at your job might not be what ISACA or ISC2 expects as the textbook response.

I’ve watched 20-year veterans fail CISSP because they answered like practitioners instead of like CISSP candidates. The exam wants you to think like a manager, even if you’ve been a hands-on engineer your whole career. Adjusting that mindset takes practice with the actual question style, which means working through hundreds of practice questions and reviewing why each answer is right or wrong.

Concepts That Don’t Have a Visual

Some cybersecurity topics are inherently abstract. Risk management math, cryptographic concepts, governance frameworks, and policy hierarchies don’t have an easy mental picture to attach them to. People who learn well from diagrams and hands-on labs sometimes struggle when the material gets philosophical.

The fix is finding analogies that work for you and writing concepts in your own words. If you can’t explain quantitative risk analysis to a friend in plain English, you don’t understand it well enough for the exam. This is where teaching the material to someone else, even if that someone is just your dog, makes a real difference.

Burnout Around Week Six

The first two weeks are exciting. New material, fresh momentum, that pump of feeling like you’re finally doing something for your career. Then weeks four through six hit and the material gets harder, the novelty wears off, and life keeps happening. Kids get sick, work blows up, you miss a few days, and suddenly your plan feels impossible to recover.

This is when most people quietly quit. They don’t announce it, they just stop opening the book and tell themselves they’ll get back to it next week. Six months later they call us asking about a refund on the boot camp seat they never used. Building in scheduled rest days, accountability check-ins with a study partner, or signing up for a structured boot camp prevents this drift better than any other tactic.

Practice Test Self-Deception

There’s a specific failure mode I see constantly. Candidates take the same practice tests over and over, eventually scoring 95%+, and walk into the exam thinking they’re ready. They aren’t. They’ve memorized the answers to those specific questions, not the underlying concepts. My colleague Mark wrote a piece on why hitting 100% on practice tests is a red flag that’s worth reading before you start. The short version: if you can answer a question without reading the full stem, you’ve memorized the question rather than the material.


What Makes Studying Cybersecurity Easier

The candidates who pass on their first attempt almost always share a few habits. None of these require special talent. They require choices about how you spend your study time.

Starting with the right certification matters more than people realize. If you’re brand new to IT, jumping straight into CISSP or an offensive security cert like OSCP is going to be miserable. Foundational certs like CompTIA A+, Network+, and then Security+ give you the underlying knowledge that makes everything else click. Skipping that foundation looks like a shortcut on paper, but in practice it’s a way to fail your first attempt and pay the exam fee twice. We see this pattern enough that we wrote up a guide on getting started in cybersecurity specifically to help people pick the right entry point.

A structured plan beats unlimited time. Candidates who say they’ll study “whenever they can” usually study almost never. The ones who block off Tuesday and Thursday from 7 to 8 PM and Saturday morning from 9 to noon are the ones who actually finish the cert. Your plan doesn’t have to be perfect. It just has to exist, and you have to follow it most weeks.

Hands-on labs make abstract concepts stick. Reading about how a buffer overflow works is one thing. Actually setting up a vulnerable VM and exploiting it lands in your brain differently. The same applies to firewall configuration, log analysis, packet captures, and basically every technical concept you’ll be tested on. Most quality training programs include lab access for this reason. If you’re self-studying, free platforms like HackTheBox exist, though I’d be careful about treating them as a replacement for structured cert prep. They’re a complement, not a substitute.

Active recall beats passive review. Closing the book and writing down everything you remember about a topic is more effective than rereading the chapter. Explaining a concept to someone else, even if it’s just talking to yourself in the car, locks it in. Watching a video about cryptography while folding laundry feels productive but probably isn’t.

The boot camp question I get every week: Are intensive boot camps actually faster than self-study? For most working professionals, yes. A focused one or two week immersion gives you uninterrupted study time, an instructor who can answer questions in real time, and accountability that’s hard to create on your own. The price tag looks bigger than self-study until you factor in the months of evenings and weekends you’d otherwise spend on it. Time has a real cost.


Who Finds Cybersecurity Studying Harder Than Average

Some backgrounds make this harder, and being honest about it helps you plan accordingly. Career changers coming from non-technical fields like nursing, teaching, or retail typically need an extra 20 to 30% study time on entry-level certs because they’re learning IT fundamentals alongside the security material. That’s not a problem. It just changes your timeline.

People who haven’t studied formally in 15 or 20 years sometimes underestimate how much study stamina they’ve lost. Reading a dense technical chapter and retaining it is a muscle that atrophies. The fix is to start with shorter study sessions and build up. Jumping straight to three-hour blocks in week one is a recipe for burnout. Ramping up gradually from 45 minutes to 90 minutes across the first month tends to work better.

Test anxiety affects more candidates than people admit. Sitting in a Pearson Vue testing center with a camera on you for four hours straight is not natural. Some of the people who say cybersecurity is hard actually find the studying fine and the exam experience itself terrifying. If that’s you, practice exams under timed conditions in a quiet room, repeatedly, until the format stops feeling foreign. The material doesn’t get harder. Your brain just stops freezing up when the timer starts.


How Cybersecurity Studying Compares to Other IT Fields

People ask me whether cybersecurity is harder to study than networking, cloud, or general IT. Honestly, it depends on how you’re wired. Networking certifications like CCNA are heavy on configuration syntax and protocol details. You’re memorizing command structures and troubleshooting flows. Some people find that easier because it’s concrete. You either typed the command right or you didn’t.

Cloud certifications like AWS or Azure require you to learn a specific vendor’s services, naming conventions, and best practices. There’s a lot of memorization, but the concepts are usually pretty intuitive once you actually use the platform. Hands-on labs help enormously here.

Cybersecurity sits somewhere in the middle. There’s technical depth like networking, but there’s also a lot of abstract material around risk, governance, and policy that doesn’t have a clean answer. Questions are often more situational, which trips up people who prefer concrete subjects. On the other hand, the field rewards critical thinking more than other IT areas, which is actually fun for the right kind of person.

If you’re not sure whether cybersecurity or another IT path is right for you, our team wrote an honest comparison piece on whether to learn cloud or cybersecurity first that breaks down the decision based on your career goals.


Signs You’re Actually Ready to Take the Exam

A lot of people schedule their exam too early because they’re tired of studying. That’s a $400 to $760 mistake depending on the cert. Before you click the schedule button, run through this gut check.

You’re consistently scoring 80% or higher on practice questions you haven’t seen before. Not the same questions you’ve taken three times. Brand new questions from a different question bank. If your scores drop 15 points when you switch question sources, you’ve memorized the original bank.

You can explain every domain to someone outside the field. If you can describe risk management, cryptography, and access control concepts to a friend who works in marketing without using a single piece of jargon they don’t understand, you actually know the material. Stumbling or falling back on textbook definitions means you’ve memorized rather than learned.

You’ve completed at least one full-length practice exam in a single timed sitting and passed. Reading questions for hours straight is its own skill. Some people who score well on 30-question quizzes fall apart on a 150-question exam because their concentration breaks at the two-hour mark.

When you miss a practice question, you can articulate exactly why the right answer was correct and why your answer was wrong. If your explanation is “I just guessed” or “I don’t know, I’ll memorize this one,” you have more studying to do. Wrong answers should teach you something every single time.

🎯 The Bottom Line on Studying Cybersecurity

Studying cybersecurity is hard the same way training for a half marathon is hard. Individual workouts aren’t crazy on their own. What kills people is showing up week after week when life is doing its best to talk them out of it. The candidates who pass aren’t the smartest people I’ve worked with. They’re the ones who picked the right starting cert, built a realistic study schedule, used practice tests honestly, and asked for help when they hit a wall. If you’re thinking about taking the plunge, the field is wide open. The 2025 ISC2 Cybersecurity Workforce Study stopped publishing a single global gap figure because skills shortages have become the bigger story than raw headcount, with 59% of respondents citing critical or significant skills gaps. Pick your starting cert, block out the time on your calendar, and start tonight.


Frequently Asked Questions About Studying Cybersecurity

Can I study cybersecurity without an IT background?

Yes, but plan on starting with foundational material before jumping straight into security topics. Most career changers do well starting with CompTIA A+ or Network+ to build the IT base, then moving to Security+ for their first security cert. Trying to start at CISSP without IT experience usually leads to a failed first attempt and wasted exam fees.

How long does it take to study for Security+?

Most candidates need 80 to 120 hours of focused study time, which typically works out to 8 to 12 weeks at one to two hours per weekday plus some weekend time. People with existing IT experience tend to land closer to 60 to 80 hours. Career changers with no IT background should plan for the upper end.

Is cybersecurity harder to study than coding or programming?

Different kind of hard. Programming requires building working logic in your head and getting immediate feedback when something breaks. Cybersecurity is more about pattern recognition, framework knowledge, and situational judgment. Most people find one or the other clicks naturally for them based on how their brain works.

Do I need to know how to code to study cybersecurity?

For entry-level certs like Security+ or SSCP, no. Basic familiarity with scripting helps but isn’t required to pass. For more technical certifications like OSCP or PenTest+, you’ll want at least basic Python and bash scripting knowledge. Management-track certs like CISM and CISSP don’t require any coding at all.

What is the hardest part about studying cybersecurity?

For most people, the hardest part is the sheer volume of material combined with the discipline to study consistently over months. Technical concepts are learnable on their own. What gets people is building the habit of sitting down to study three to five times a week when they’d rather do anything else.

Is a boot camp worth it or should I self-study?

Self-study works for disciplined learners who already have IT fundamentals and time on their hands. Boot camps work better for working professionals who need to compress study time, want live instruction, and benefit from accountability. The right answer depends on your schedule, learning style, and how much your time is worth to you.

What happens if I fail my first cybersecurity exam?

You wait the required cooldown period, which is usually two to four weeks depending on the vendor, then retake. CompTIA allows immediate retakes after one failure but charges full price each time. ISC2 requires a 30-day wait. ISACA exams allow up to four attempts per testing window. Your score report will tell you which domains you struggled with, which is gold for planning your retake studying.

Ken Sahs

Vice President of Sales. Training Camp

Ken Sahs is the Director of Sales at Training Camp, where he leads the company's sales team and oversees all ISACA certification programs. He helps organizations navigate the world of IT governance and risk management certifications – including CISA, CISM, and CRISC. He works directly with enterprise clients to create training programs that not only get their teams certified but also solve real business challenges.