Hello, you are using an old browser that's unsafe and no longer supported. Please consider updating your browser to a newer version, or downloading a modern browser.
A strategy the client cannot staff is a strategy that stalls. Adding certification training to an engagement turns the recommendation into something their team can actually run, and extends the engagement past the report.
Most transformation work fails on capability rather than on strategy. The assessment is right, the roadmap is right, and the client team cannot execute it because nobody has the skills the new operating model assumes.
Building that capability is usually outside a consulting firm’s own delivery model, so it gets recommended and left to the client. Partnering lets you carry it through instead, under your name, without hiring instructors or licensing courseware.
Certification becomes a standard phase of the engagement rather than an optional extra. The assessment identifies the skills gap, and the roadmap includes the training that closes it, on dates you set.
Large programs stall when the client team cannot operate the target state. Running certification alongside the workstreams keeps capability on the same timeline as the technology.
Delivered under your brand where training should look like part of your practice, or co-branded where the vendor authorization is itself part of the credibility you are selling. Your call, agreed up front.
Security and governance practices lean on ISC2 and ISACA; cloud practices on Microsoft, AWS and Cisco; risk and privacy on IAPP. The catalog covers the certifications your recommendations already reference.
Contracts and RFPs that carry a training or education component come up constantly, and the training is usually the piece a firm has no way to deliver itself. That does not have to be a reason to pass on the work.
Bid it. When you win, we deliver the training as your partner: instructors, courseware, scheduling and exams. You hold the contract and the client relationship, and the service side runs behind you.
What makes this work across a lot of different bids is breadth. Requirements rarely land on a single certification, and we cover a wide range of training products, so one partnership usually covers the whole scope rather than part of it.
Firm size is not a factor. Small businesses partner with us on this the same way larger ones do.
Consulting partnerships are usually shaped during a pursuit, so the support is weighted toward the proposal stage.
Yes, and it is a common reason firms partner with us. You bid and hold the contract; we deliver the training behind you. Because the catalog is broad, a requirement that spans several certifications usually still comes back to one partner rather than several. Send us the scope and we will tell you plainly what we cover and what we do not.
No. Small businesses partner with us on the same terms as larger firms. There is no fee to join and no minimum volume.
Only if you want them to. White-label delivery carries your brand throughout. Co-branded is the other common choice, and it tends to be the better one when the vendor authorization is part of your argument.
Yes. Partner pricing is what you buy at; what you charge the client is yours to set, whether that is a separate line or absorbed into the engagement.
No. Instructors, courseware and exam delivery are ours. What you bring is the client relationship and the diagnosis of what they need.
Dates are set against your milestones rather than a public calendar. Most partners are quoting real dates within the first week of the agreement, because you get live schedule access on onboarding.
Tell us what your practice advises on and who your clients are. The partnership team replies within 24 to 48 hours to book a short call.
Compare them side by side.